Crypto飞哥
--
Discuss the practical differences between the SOL chain and the ETH chain
The differences between the Sol chain and the Ether chain have been a hot topic recently, so let’s briefly chat about it.
First, let's compare the Sol chain with Bitcoin.
The Sol chain has maximum practicality but almost zero decentralization; whereas Bitcoin is the pinnacle of decentralization, but if we talk about practicality... those who have played with inscriptions should understand, it is basically unusable.
Now, let’s look at Ethereum.
It takes a middle ground between decentralization and practicality, with each occupying half. Some people feel that Ethereum is neither as fast as Sol nor as decentralized as Bitcoin, concluding that it is “not good.” But this perspective is actually too one-sided.
Why do I say that?
• During peaceful periods on the chain, everyone values practicality more, which makes Sol quite appealing, that’s normal.
• However, once the market becomes turbulent, Ethereum's advantage in decentralization becomes apparent. With the development of the Layer 2 ecosystem, Ethereum's shortcomings in performance and transaction speed are also being continuously optimized.
More importantly, the crypto industry is still in its early stages, and the future direction is uncertain.
Currently, the most core conflict is “decentralization vs regulation.” In such an environment, Ethereum’s choice to “grasp both hands” ensures a certain degree of decentralization while gradually improving practicality, and this strategy has no issues; it may even be a more prudent choice.
The differences between the Sol chain and the Ether chain have been a hot topic recently, so let’s briefly chat about it.
First, let's compare the Sol chain with Bitcoin.
The Sol chain has maximum practicality but almost zero decentralization; whereas Bitcoin is the pinnacle of decentralization, but if we talk about practicality... those who have played with inscriptions should understand, it is basically unusable.
Now, let’s look at Ethereum.
It takes a middle ground between decentralization and practicality, with each occupying half. Some people feel that Ethereum is neither as fast as Sol nor as decentralized as Bitcoin, concluding that it is “not good.” But this perspective is actually too one-sided.
Why do I say that?
• During peaceful periods on the chain, everyone values practicality more, which makes Sol quite appealing, that’s normal.
• However, once the market becomes turbulent, Ethereum's advantage in decentralization becomes apparent. With the development of the Layer 2 ecosystem, Ethereum's shortcomings in performance and transaction speed are also being continuously optimized.
More importantly, the crypto industry is still in its early stages, and the future direction is uncertain.
Currently, the most core conflict is “decentralization vs regulation.” In such an environment, Ethereum’s choice to “grasp both hands” ensures a certain degree of decentralization while gradually improving practicality, and this strategy has no issues; it may even be a more prudent choice.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
