The #1800BTC事件 incident refers to the controversy triggered by Twitter user @clarissexx0805, who claimed to have staked 1800 BTC in the Solv Protocol but did not receive the expected rewards. Below are the specifics of the incident and comments from various parties:

Incident Overview

• User Allegation: @clarissexx0805 claims to have provided liquidity of 1800 BTC during the early stages of the Solv Protocol, but as the token generation event approached, the protocol did not fulfill its promised rewards.

• Solv's Response: Solv Protocol stated that the user chose the product with the lowest returns and did not follow the advice to switch to higher-yield options; therefore, the team bears no fault.

• Incident Escalation: @nubit_org founder @trackoor intervened, warning users to withdraw their investments and comparing Solv's transparency to FTX, accusing it of having “fake TVL.” Solv rebutted that it was spreading panic-inducing rumors.

Community Reaction

• Critical Voices: Some industry insiders, such as @nina_rong, @bithaha, and @trackoor, questioned why @clarissexx0805's 1800 BTC remained in her wallet yet was counted in @solvprotocol's TVL, raising serious concerns about transparency.

• Supportive Voices: There are also many supporters who believe this is a deliberate defamation campaign aimed at damaging Solv's reputation by spreading FUD. Solv co-founder @myantokengeek even suggested that this incident might be an organized attack.

Personal Views

• Ambiguous Protocol Details: The agreement between clarisse and solv lacks clarity, leading to a situation where both sides have differing accounts. Insufficient transparency of the agreement has become the core of the dispute.

• Dispute over Returns and Responsibility: If Solv's explanation is true, then clarisse's responsibility cannot be overlooked. However, as a protocol combining centralized and decentralized elements, should Solv be more proactive in reminding users to help them achieve higher returns?

• Protocol Transparency: @trackoor's skepticism about TVL transparency reveals the imperfections of on-chain reporting. If the protocol can disclose its operational model and key data more clearly, it will effectively avoid similar disputes.

• Crisis Management Ability: Solv's quick response demonstrates strong crisis management capability, but its rebuttal of the “conspiracy theory” claims needs more evidence to support it.

Impact on the Industry

• Erosion of Trust: This incident may undermine public trust in the BTCFi sector, thereby slowing the pace of development in the field.