1800BTC事件

#1800BTC事件
This is an event that has attracted widespread attention in the cryptocurrency field. It mainly involves Solv Protocol and a user known as "Rights Protection Sister." Here are the main developments of the event:

1. **Cause of the Incident**: Solv Protocol is an early BTC financial (BTCFi) practice project aimed at attracting market attention by increasing the Total Value Locked (TVL). A user named @Clarissexx0805 (i.e., "Rights Protection Sister") staked 1800 BTC on Solv Protocol.

2. **Rights Protection Action**: Rights Protection Sister expressed dissatisfaction with Solv Protocol's airdrop policy, as despite staking a large amount of BTC, her share in the project was very small. She repeatedly asked the project team for an explanation but did not receive a satisfactory response.

3. **Live Sale of SOLV for ZAI**: Rights Protection Sister sold SOLV during a live stream and used the proceeds to purchase ZAI tokens, planning to airdrop ZAI to retail investors participating in the rights protection effort.

4. **AI Agent Project**: Rights Protection Sister also initiated the AI Agent project, aimed at automating the release of rights protection information and returning the earnings from Solv to the community in the form of ZAI tokens.

5. **Community Reaction**: This event has sparked widespread discussion in the community, with some supporting Rights Protection Sister's actions, believing she is fighting for fairness and justice in the cryptocurrency world. At the same time, others have expressed doubts about this behavior.

The #1800BTC事件 incident refers to the controversy triggered by Twitter user @clarissexx0805, who claimed to have staked 1800 BTC in the Solv Protocol but did not receive the expected rewards. Below are the specifics of the incident and comments from various parties:

Incident Overview

• User Allegation: @clarissexx0805 claims to have provided liquidity of 1800 BTC during the early stages of the Solv Protocol, but as the token generation event approached, the protocol did not fulfill its promised rewards.

• Solv's Response: Solv Protocol stated that the user chose the product with the lowest returns and did not follow the advice to switch to higher-yield options; therefore, the team bears no fault.

• Incident Escalation: @nubit_org founder @trackoor intervened, warning users to withdraw their investments and comparing Solv's transparency to FTX, accusing it of having “fake TVL.” Solv rebutted that it was spreading panic-inducing rumors.

Community Reaction

• Critical Voices: Some industry insiders, such as @nina_rong, @bithaha, and @trackoor, questioned why @clarissexx0805's 1800 BTC remained in her wallet yet was counted in @solvprotocol's TVL, raising serious concerns about transparency.

• Supportive Voices: There are also many supporters who believe this is a deliberate defamation campaign aimed at damaging Solv's reputation by spreading FUD. Solv co-founder @myantokengeek even suggested that this incident might be an organized attack.

Personal Views

• Ambiguous Protocol Details: The agreement between clarisse and solv lacks clarity, leading to a situation where both sides have differing accounts. Insufficient transparency of the agreement has become the core of the dispute.

• Dispute over Returns and Responsibility: If Solv's explanation is true, then clarisse's responsibility cannot be overlooked. However, as a protocol combining centralized and decentralized elements, should Solv be more proactive in reminding users to help them achieve higher returns?

• Protocol Transparency: @trackoor's skepticism about TVL transparency reveals the imperfections of on-chain reporting. If the protocol can disclose its operational model and key data more clearly, it will effectively avoid similar disputes.

• Crisis Management Ability: Solv's quick response demonstrates strong crisis management capability, but its rebuttal of the “conspiracy theory” claims needs more evidence to support it.

Impact on the Industry

• Erosion of Trust: This incident may undermine public trust in the BTCFi sector, thereby slowing the pace of development in the field.

Let me tell you why you can short solv infinitely
#SOLV开盘
First of all, have you heard about the time storm of 1800BTC?
The project owner deceived our protagonist's trust and used the protagonist's 1800BTC as a pledge to increase their TVL.
They also deceived our sister Mudita many times, saying that the coin can be issued in June 2024. But in fact, it took more than half a year from June to this year to issue the coin, and our sister Mudita's share was cut a lot. It can be seen that the pattern of this project owner is really small.

In addition:
The founder of Solv is a Chinese. As the saying goes, Chinese people love to cheat Chinese people the most, and this project owner is completely dependent on licking Binance to get on Binance. It can be seen that the project itself has no characteristics. It is completely dependent on this person's connections to get on BN. The last BN coin that relied on connections was SCR, a coin of a famous fraud gang. It has been cut in half after it went online. Mao Mao's view on this coin is very simple. Just short it without thinking. Let's see you at 0.01!

#1800BTC事件

These days, I have been flooded with #1800BTC事件

What can I say, I have been involved with the #Solv project from the very beginning. A little research shows that #Solv's TVL is not fake, and all SolvBTC in the TVL is pegged 1:1 with the mainnet BTC. This time, it seems that some 'project' is envious of SOLV, so they are using this low-level smear tactic. After the founder of Nubit made these accusations, it was nothing more than competition for interests. Moreover, it is not uncommon for competitors in the same field to use smear tactics, all just to try to obstruct Binance from listing SOLV, but the eyes of the public are sharp!

You can check the relevant address link for the 1800 BTC lady's staking minting: https://debank.com/profile/0x190fee1b429743b676fa951c6425acb08a62d70b/history

So everyone can just enjoy the fun; a truly good project can withstand the test. The TGE of #Solv is coming soon, just be patient and wait for the flowers to bloom!

#SolvBtc

Want to know the truth behind it? Keep following the sister. The initial reward for helping the rights protection sister is a guaranteed scholarship, and of course, this is a high-probability event for airdrops from the rights protection sister.
The rights protection sister is live streaming on Yingshi Guanmeng, and everyone is welcome to supervise and watch.
#Solv开盘 #维权姐姐 #1800BTC事件

#1800BTC事件

The "1800BTC incident" has recently attracted widespread attention in the cryptocurrency circle. A user named @Clarissexx0805 pledged 1,800 BTC in the Solv Protocol project, but did not receive the expected airdrop income, which triggered a rights protection action. The following is a brief overview of the incident: @Clarissexx0805 pledged a large amount of Bitcoin in Solv Protocol, but the airdrop allocation result was far below her expectations. Faced with this situation, she took an innovative approach, issuing the AI ​​Agent project ZaichXBT and supporting rights protection activities through airdrop tokens $ZAI. This incident not only revealed some unspoken rules in the cryptocurrency industry, but also triggered discussions about the relationship between large users and project parties. The following is a detailed interpretation of the incident.
This sister is quite beautiful