$USUAL Here I want to raise a criticism towards the Usual team. I mentioned in a previous post that Usual lacks communication with users, and I was even confronted in French by the project team, accused of lying.

So does the recent behavior of the project team indicate that what I said is not a fact?

Originally, the stablecoin sector is very competitive and hot, and Usual received support from Binance, inherently carrying traffic, gaining great attention before and after its launch, starting with a good hand. However, you will find that Usual's official website lacks a forum channel for user communication, and using a third-party platform as the main communication channel is not effective, as attention is too scattered.

Usual has not opened a Chinese or French Twitter account, and you cannot find Usual's official account on Binance Square. Before and after the launch, a large number of bots were sent to hype things up, which is completely not the way a good business should operate.

Looking at the work history of the project team, you will find that their work experience is completely lacking. I am optimistic about the stablecoin sector, but the key is still daily operations. Comparing with the competitor $ENA 's operational capabilities, I express doubts about their team's work abilities.

Confidence is more important than gold. Currently, users have lost confidence in Usual, and this is the key issue. How to restore users' confidence and repair credit is the project team's top priority.