Earlier, I was like most people who don't trade contracts, 🤔 and I was quite disgusted by those who frequently play high-leverage contracts, often unable to help but arrogantly 🧑‍🏫 warn others. But as I delved deeper into this circle, I realized that I was too naive 😧. Without their frequent trading providing more activity and 'price discovery' to the market, the 'coin hoarders' might also struggle to gain stable long-term returns from the market.

These 'heroes' risk a high rate of failure for the chance of short-term high profits, inadvertently becoming an important driving force for market operations. Their existence is still worthy of our respect.

That said, there are certainly effective high-leverage strategies in this market, but they must meet two conditions: first, the capital using this strategy cannot be too large; second, not many people can be using this strategy.

This is not something you can find everywhere like 'street vendor goods', and if the volume is large, it will definitely be targeted. No matter how smart you are, can you outsmart those who have 'long-term capital'? 😂

As a 'long-termist', I am essentially against 'zero-sum games' or seeking to reduce the intensity of the game.

On the other hand, strengthening the 'game intensity' may indeed bring you substantial short-term returns. The world of investing is full of 'contradictions', and only through persistent learning and summarizing can one go far.