Every time BTC crashes, there are always a group of 'after-the-fact Zhuge Liang' fake experts appearing in Binance Square, claiming 'the big drop has indeed arrived', as if they had seen it all coming. Strangely, these so-called 'risk warnings' almost always arrive late, only showing up after the crash has ended, shouting a few 'downward warning' calls at the tail end of the trend—if predictions come this way, anyone could stand in the square and 'point out the situation'!

If we look back at the historical remarks of these 'experts': when the market rises, they remind us of 'adjustment risks', and when it falls, they post 'predictions' that it will continue to drop. Their rhetoric is perfect—no matter which way it goes, they lose nothing. One wonders if the dictionary of these 'professionals' even contains the words 'real prediction', or if 'after-the-fact' has already become their consistent tactic?

For us ordinary retail investors, this kind of 'after-the-fact analysis' in the square has become quite tiresome. Every time there is a big fluctuation, these experts always jump out at the end to review the situation, putting on a posture of 'I said it long ago'. If they truly have such predictive abilities, why don’t they remind everyone sooner? Or is it that they only have the courage to 'look at the big picture' after the market has run its course?

The manipulators operate in the front, while fake experts play tricks in the background. For these 'predictions' that always come after the fact, retail investors might as well laugh it off. After all, if 'predictions' can go back and forth like this, I just want to say一句 * B hurry up and die #美国大选后行情预测 #美国大选后涨或跌？ $BTC $ETH $BNB