The token soared 60 times, and the FLUX protocol ignited heated discussions in the Chinese community ahead of time
Yesterday, the Fractal mainnet was officially launched.
While everyone was still immersed in discussing and calculating the profit and loss of mining the token FB during the day, FLUX, known as Fractal's first token protocol, suddenly came out in the evening. In addition, the FLUX protocol token of the same name was minted within half an hour, with a total of 21 million, and the casting cost of one (1,000) was 0.05 FB. (Odaily Note: The FB over-the-counter price is 15 USDT, and the casting cost of a single FLUX is about 0.75 USDT)
Although the token has no index and market yet, the over-the-counter trading price once reached 50 USDT/piece; calculated based on the casting cost, the increase was more than 60 times. Such high returns have also made the Bitcoin community lively again:
"I have turned over by using the airdropped FB zero-cost mint"
"It's over, you have hit the next ORDI"
"This moment is just like that moment, the familiar feeling of the inscription craze is back"
In fact, the BRC-20 token officially supported by Fractal will not be activated until the main network block height reaches 21,000 - the current block height is 5490, and it will take about 5 days to reach the set height.
Logically speaking, no related tokens will appear before this. What is the origin of the FLUX token protocol, and can it reproduce the inscription craze? This article will briefly interpret the FLUX protocol.
Searching for the keyword "FLUX" on the X platform and adding language area restrictions will find that although the FLUX protocol is an overseas project, various discussions in the Chinese area are relatively active, from protocol introduction, casting discussion to pulling OTC trading groups, compared with fewer discussions in other language areas.
