Crypto Insight Bulletin

The Identity Shift: Why Vanar?
The name Terra Virtua was the name of digital collectibles and the metaverse, which had decades of association. It was also an early innovator but as the evolution of the Web3 moved to 2026 the team discovered a very clichéd truth to create a truly intelligent, mass-market ecosystem you cannot afford to coexist upon someone else. It is your own foundation you must cast.
The exchange of the $TVK token with $VANRY was not a simple make-over of the price, but a statement of independence. Vanar Chain was created as a response to the need to have a Layer 1 (L1) [?][?] with the ability to support the heavy traffic of modern entertainment, gaming, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) without the gas fee nightmares or choke points of older chains.
Construction of an Intelligence Home
Why is Vanar any better than the dozens of other L1s? It is the original chain to be AI-native. Previously, AI and blockchain were two neighbours who did not understand each other. Vanar creates a bridge. The blockchain would not simply store, but by specially updating the Vanar Stack with the Neutron and Kayon engines, it would comprehend the data.
Think about the world which claims your smart contracts to be able to read a PDF invoice or a legal act on-chain without the participation of an external node. Such is the truth Vanar is constructing. It transports us off of a dumb ledger towards a thinking infrastructure.
The $VANRY Utility
This new world is centred around $VANRY . It is the blood of the network, driving all of it, even the most basic transactions (an average of $0.0005 ) and also ensuring that the network is safe thanks to staking. To the user, it is a smooth experience with the technology being backgrounded and the value becoming foregrounded.
Why it Matters Now
Gazing 2026, Vanar is poising itself to be the backbone of the AI economy. It is no longer about NFTs.It is about Real-World Assets (RWA) and PayFi (Payment Finance). With the ownership of the whole stack, Vanar is guaranteed that the blockchain will always be on top as the world becomes smarter.
#vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Cryptocurrency market patterns alternate on waves of innovation. Immutable ledgers happened in 2009-2014, programmable money with smart contracts in 2015-2019, and scaling in 2020-2024. However, in 2026, things will change radically: thinking blockchains. Vanar Chain represents this development more thoroughly than any other competing platform-and to traders, who sees the emerging infrastructure games, knowing why it is of utmost significance.
The Woeful Prospects of Retrofitted AI Blockchains.
The Layer 1 networks mostly consider AI as a byproduct. Ether, Solana and even Avalance are more of high-throughput transaction registries with AI services overlayed with costly oracle networks and middleware off-chain. This puts three debilitating constraints on the side of enterprise users that can be felt instantly:
Opacity Gap: non-cryptographic opacities of off-chain AI decisions. In case an AI agent proposes a position in DeFi that costs 10M, regulators require it to provide evidence of its thinking. Conventional blockchains are not capable of doing it- establishing a baseline trust barrier.Latency Tax: Each AI smart contract interaction would entail oracle calls at the price of $5-50 each with 30-120 seconds response time. This friction cannot stand any enterprise payment systems that process millions of transactions in a single day.Compliance Void: Tibial AML regulations (EU AML, US OFAC) state that the decision trail is audited. Off-chain AI produces none. Businesses that have 2T+ of annual expenses will not access infrastructure without compliance-quality arguments.
Native Intelligence Stack by Vanar.
Vanar removes these limitations by architecture design in three layered fusion design:
Layer 1: Vanar Chain Foundation
Execution environment EVM compatible, block times of 3 seconds, transaction costs of 0.0005, has a 30m gas cap per block, which allows complex workloads with AI implementation at scale. Use of Go Ethereum (GETH) implementation gives familiarity to the developer no learning curve.
Layer 2: Neutron - Semantic Data Compression.
Conventional blockchains have a payload capacity of about 65KB/transactions. In the real world, enterprise documents (contracts, compliance certificates, insurance policies, etc.) are 200-500KB on average. Hacks such as IPFS result in the creation of custody risk- files that are not pinned disappear.
Neutron has 500:1 compression with a four stage AI pipeline:
Neural reconfigurations: Patterns of documents are identified through machine learning.Quantum aware encoding: Algorithms to compress unique data.Chain native indexing: Optimization of smart contract queries.Deterministic recovery: Entire documents recoverable on-chain.
Outcome: a 500KB property deed is reduced to 1KB "Neutron Seed" permanently stored, instantly queryable, full audit.
layer 3: Kayon On-Chain Reasoning Engine
Kayon has smart contracts know how to reason and comprehend Neutron Seeds. Rather than numiniferous logic, contracts can:
IF (invoice matches PO) AND (delivery confirmed) AND (insurance covers transit) AND (seller KYC verified across 47 jurisdictions)THEN execute_payment()
All arguments documented forever. Decision paths are audited by regulators. Companies that make cross-border payments will receive cryptographic evidence of conformity.
Trillion Dollar Market Collision
The architecture of Vanar is aimed at serving three enormous markets at the same time:
PayFi Transformation (Opportunity 2.3T)
The thesis is confirmed by the Worldpay partnership. Now state of chargeback processing 60+ days, 7+ middlemen, 2-3% charge. Vanar reduces this to 3 seconds with no intermediaries.
Permanent records of transactions (Neutron Seeds).Kayon reasoning Automated compliance verification (Kayon reasoning)Unexpected settlement (3 seconds finality)
Worldpay volume migration 0.1% = $2.3B annual throughput $1M+ monthly VANRY protocol revenue.
RWA Tokenization (Addressable 5T+)
Deeds to property, carbon credits, invoices, regulatory filings each of them becomes Neutron Seeds with compliance logic embedded in them. Current RWA market: $500M TVL. Vanar is designed to target enterprise level in need of tokenizing auditing.
Enterprise AI Infrastructure (450B in 2035)
Gartner: By end-2026, 40 percent of enterprise apps will have task-specific AI agents. Agents require executable environments. This is what vanar offers exactly getting placed earlier on the ais of AI adoption in the enterprise.
Token Economics: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Consideration in Unison
The supply model of VANRY strengthens the security of the network:

No team allocation. First in validating 7-14% APY; scale depending on adoption. Gas fee collection compounding staking returns.
Current Market Positioning
January 21, 2026 Metrics:
Price: $0.008907 (+1.52% 24h) Market Cap: $19.81M (#738 rank)24h Volume: $6.08M (30.72% vol/mkt cap)FDV: $21.37MCirculating: 2.22B / 2.4B total
Valuation Background Microscopic vs. Ethereum ($1.2T), Solana ($165B), even specific L1s like Aptos (5B+). Premature pricing of infrastructure.
Technological Signs (as of late analysis):
4H Chart: Bullish (50-day MA rising)Daily Chart: Bearish (200-day MA declining since dec 2025)Important Levels Support $0.0082, Resistance $0.00975.
Investment Thesis & Risk Framework
Bull Case ($0.05-0.10 by 2028):Kayon Alpha 2026 business is successful.Worldpay pilots are turned to production (0.1% volume).Neutron Seeds attain RWA momentum.Staking economics is complicated by the presence of validators.Base Case ($0.02-0.04): Ninety-five percent completion in 2/4 use cases.Bear Case ( 0.003-0.005): technical delays, stalling of partnerships, regulatory headwinds.
Monitoring Execution Catalysts:
Feb 2026: Arcana Network CEO webinar w/ VanarQ1 2026: Kayon enterprise pilots revealed.April 2026: Neutron popular debut (Vanar Vision summit)
Strategic Positioning
Vanar does not market itself based on speed of transactions (saturated). It competes by the density of intelligence per transaction - the only metric that may count in trillion-dollar workflows within enterprises. Curr. market values, the probabilities of 1% Worldpay adoption, are 0.001% and the market cap stands at $19.81M. Smart money disagrees.
To the traders: Support zone at dollar-cost average 0.008290.0085. Stake 50% position for 7-14% APY. Surveillance validator development + business declaration.To investors: 18-36 months horizon is in line with enterprise pilot seasons. Position size indicates the risk of execution (10- 20 portfolio maximum).
Vanar Chain is not a more cost-effective or quicker one. It's smarter. And intelligence compounds.
#vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Crypto culture worships transparency. "Don't trust, verify" became the rallying cry.​
Institutions heard that and walked away.​
The dirty secret nobody wants to admit? Companies can't operate on blockchains where competitors see every transaction. Neither can individuals who value financial privacy in an age of surveillance capitalism.​
Dusk Foundation built the exit door from this false choice between radical transparency and regulatory compliance.​
Why Transparency Isn't a Feature
Imagine running a business where every competitor sees your supplier payments, revenue streams, and acquisition attempts in real-time.​
That's Ethereum. That's Bitcoin. That's most public blockchains.​
For individuals, it means anyone you transact with can view your entire financial history account balances, income sources, spending patterns. The blockchain never forgets, and it certainly doesn't keep secrets.​
DeFi enthusiasts argue this transparency prevents fraud. They're not wrong. But they're solving for a different threat model than enterprises face.
Institutions need selective disclosure the ability to prove compliance to regulators while protecting commercial strategy from competitors.​
Zero-Knowledge Changes Everything
Zero-knowledge proofs sound like cryptography jargon until you see them in action.​
The mathematical breakthrough: proving you know something without revealing what you know. Proving your bank balance exceeds a threshold without disclosing the actual amount. Proving you're an accredited investor without sharing your financial statements.​
Dusk implements this through multiple layers.​
Phoenix transactions use stealth addresses, ring confidential signatures, and cryptographic commitments to hide sender, receiver, and amount. Not obfuscation mathematical proof that transaction is valid without revealing details.
The Segregated Byzantine Agreement consensus mechanism allows Block Generators to stake anonymously through Proof of Blind Bid. The network validates stake amounts without knowing who's staking or how much.​
Citadel's self-sovereign identity system lets users prove claims about themselves age, citizenship, accreditation without exposing underlying documents.​
Each layer adds privacy without sacrificing the verifiability that makes blockchain useful.​
Compliance Without Compromise
The genius of Dusk's approach: privacy by default, transparency when legally required.​
Moonlight's transparent transaction model coexists with Phoenix's privacy features because different use cases demand different guarantees. Exchanges need transparent accounting. Individual users deserve financial privacy. Both operate on the same network.​
This duality solves the problem that kept institutions away from blockchain: meeting regulatory obligations without turning every transaction into public spectacle.​
European regulations like MiFID II, MiCA, and the DLT Pilot Regime require specific disclosures to authorized parties. They don't require broadcasting trade data to the entire internet.​
Dusk threads this needle through zero-knowledge compliance cryptographic proofs that satisfy regulators without creating public audit trails for competitors to mine.
The Citadel Protocol
Self-sovereign identity typically means "you control your data until a service requires it, then you hand it over."​
Citadel flips the model.​
Instead of sharing credentials, you prove claims about those credentials. A service provider requests proof of accredited investor status. You generate a zero-knowledge proof from your Citadel identity. The service verifies the proof mathematically certain you meet requirements without ever seeing your financial statements.​
The service can't link your activities across platforms because each proof reveals only the specific claim being verified, nothing more. You can't be profiled by accumulated identity data because that data never leaves your control.​
For institutions conducting KYC/AML, this eliminates the liability of storing sensitive customer information while satisfying regulatory requirements. For users, it means proving eligibility without sacrificing privacy.​
The Institutional Use Case Nobody Discusses
Banks talk about blockchain for cross-border payments and settlement. That's real.​
But the more valuable application? Confidential securities trading among institutional counterparties.​
Current private markets suffer from catastrophic inefficiency. Minimum check sizes exclude most investors. Secondary market liquidity barely exists. Price discovery happens through opaque bilateral negotiations.​
Blockchain could fix this by enabling fractional ownership and automated market making. Except no institution will trade on Ethereum where every competing fund sees their positions.​
Dusk enables private markets that actually work at scale assets tokenized with legal recognition, trading that protects strategy, settlement with instant finality, compliance embedded at protocol level.​
The NPEX partnership demonstrates this isn't theory. Real securities. Real regulatory approval. Real liquidity.​
Privacy as Competitive Moat
Most Layer 1 blockchains compete on speed or cost.​
Dusk competes on something rarer: privacy architecture sophisticated enough to satisfy both users and regulators.​
Building privacy correctly requires expertise in advanced cryptography, regulatory frameworks, and financial market structure. It's not something projects add as a feature after launch.​
Dusk embedded privacy in consensus (Segregated Byzantine Agreement with anonymous staking), transactions (Phoenix's ring signatures and confidential amounts), identity (Citadel's zero-knowledge claims), and smart contracts (ZK-friendly VM architecture).​
That comprehensive approach creates network effects. As more institutions adopt Dusk for privacy-preserving finance, the liquidity concentrates, which attracts more participants.​
Privacy becomes self-reinforcing in ways transparency never could for institutional use cases.​
The Market Misconception
Crypto markets price privacy projects based on retail use cases anonymous payments, regulatory arbitrage.​
They undervalue privacy infrastructure for institutional finance.​
$DUSK at $0.05 with a $26 million market cap doesn't reflect a network partnering with regulated exchanges, integrating with Chainlink's institutional data feeds, and launching €300 million in tokenized securities.​
The gap between current price and underlying capability suggests either the market hasn't noticed, or it doesn't believe institutions need privacy.​
Every bank using confidential computing for trade data would suggest otherwise.​
Turns out the same institutions that demand privacy for their operations might value blockchain infrastructure that provides it.​
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

The date January 15, 2026, circled in red, is a day that you need to keep in your mind, in case you are interested in the future of crypto. It is then when the U.S. Senate Banking Committee decides on the furthering of a comprehensive cryptocurrency market structure bill to the full Senate. This is not a niche modification to the current regulations this is, perhaps, the first-ever wholesome federal regulatory framework of digital assets in U.S. history.

And this is important because, over time, crypto has been a regulatory no-go area. We had enforcement through litigation, lack of direction, and a network of state-level regulations that have rendered it virtually impossible to scale with a company without trepidation. This bill would make a difference by proposing consistent regulations to crypto exchanges, brokers and dealers as would occur in the conventional financial markets. The purpose is the investor protection and the market integrity that actually is muffled at the very first sight, but is of the paramount importance when it comes to the institutional adoption.

In the case of the committee vote of the bill, the full Senate will consider it, and 2026 may actually be the historic year as far as crypto regulation of the U.S. is concerned. Should it become clogged, we end up at the same point of an uncertain at best regulatory environment and market instability through policy phobia.

Regulation is not only an American tale. Frameworks are becoming homogenous in terms of what is expected across the world, and it is compelling crypto businesses to increase the intensity of their operational controls. The following are some of the major jurisdictions, which we will deconstruct.

MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) in the European Union is transitioning to enforcement, not framework. The periods of transition are also drawing to a end and obligation of the nations is also diminishing. CASPs that are not authorised yet should not think that legacy regimes will be forever. This is significant since the organisations in various EU member countries must comply with the specifications of MiCA or risk an orderly shutdown. Gone are the days of grey area operations.

When implemented, it would put MiCA enforcement, which hypothetically manifests as compliance gaps, into operational exposure. Custody controls, key management processes, incident response procedures, and transaction monitoring are no longer internal best practise- they form part of the authorization narrative that regulators wish to find documented and tested, and owned by named decision-makers.

The catch? Consensus is still lacking. This will reduce to political timelines and the ability of politicians to set aside partisan differences to enact something that is meaningful. And there is a time bomb: there is a potential government shutdown in the U.S. on January 30, which would cripple the legislative process. That is the last viable opportunity in this cycle to give the bill serious momentum, and that is the January 15 vote.

In the event that the committee grants the bill, the bill proceeds to the full Senate, and 2026 may truly become a historic year in the history of U.S. crypto regulation. Should it become clogged, we are all the way back to where we started; no regulatory predictability and market volatility due to panic over policy.

However, the matter of regulation is not merely an American one. The world is also moving towards the same level of expectations and it is making crypto businesses raise their operating standards. So, s/he can deconstruct what is taking place in major jurisdictions.

MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) is progressing in the European Union and shifting to enforcement. The interstitial stages are disappearing and national discretion is being squeezed. CASPs that are yet to undergo authorization ought not to believe legacy regimes are going to be unlimited. This is significant, as it implies that firms working in several countries of the EU should meet the requirements of MiCA or be ready to be winded down in an orderly fashion. Gone are the days of working in grey areas.

MiCA enforcement transfers the theoretical compliance gaps to operational exposure in terms of security. Custodial controls, key management processes, incident response procedures, and transaction monitoring are no longer corporate best practises, but instead have been included in the authorization storey that regulatory bodies will demand be documented, tested, and owned by individuals named decision-makers.

The Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom has introduced a detailed consultation on the framework of a future domestic crypto-regulation in December. It differs with the past advice and views crypto markets as financial, not tech products. The consultation addresses standards of custody, market abuses, prudential requirements, and disclosure requirements of staking, lending, and trading venues.

What is important here is the direction of the FCA that presupposes the ability of the organisations to show how the risk is identified, monitored, and escalated within the onchain and offchain aspects. It is to say the informal distinction between protocol design and operational responsibility is no longer adequate. Security surveillance, authority to escalate an incident and governance procedures will be evaluated more as a market behaviour as opposed to technical hygiene.

The regulatory trend in the United States under the direction of the current SEC leadership shows a calculated shift towards the development of the category of assets that contributes to downstream requirements. This is important since the classification defines the custody, disclosure, and the extent of supervision among intermediaries. Network tokens, tokenized securities and functional onchain instruments will be treated differently with different compliance expectations.

The largest cross-jurisdictional emphasis currently? Stablecoins. December solidified a trend we have observed across 2025 reserve transparency, redemption guarantees, and operational resilience have become baseline expectations, not aspirational goals. The stablecoin provisions of MiCA, the UK language of consultation, and the policy discussion of the U.S. all have the same operation assumption-issuers and integrators of stablecoins assets should show awareness of the changes in supplies in real-time, the existence of abnormal mint or burn behaviour, and exposure to upstream dependencies.

The best example is the GENIUS Act that creates a federal framework to pay using stablecoins. The regulations to be implemented will be required by January 18, 2027, and Treasury (and other concerned authorities) is already preparing the specifications. This is also going to introduce significant new players in the cryptoasset arena, namely, conventional fintech businesses and banks who have awaited a better sense of regulations before they forge into the scene.

So what does it all this imply to you as an investor or trader? Several things. To begin with, anticipate further volatility in the areas of regulatory announcements. These decisions in these policies shift markets, in some cases radically. Second, recognize that cryptocurrency regulatory transparency is eventually a bullish thing, despite the anguish of the short-term process. Institutions require regulations prior to entering capital on scale. Third, also look at what projects are proactively talking with regulators as opposed to operating in the shadows. It is the companies that have adopted compliance and transparency that will survive and flourish in the long run.

The vote on January 15 is the catalyst to look at now, yet this is truly a multi-year shift of the Wild West into a regulated and mature asset. We happen to be currently in the period of the growing pains. It is sloppy, irritating and absolutely needs to be the case. The crypto year 2026 is also becoming the year the industry may or may not like every detail of it, but crypto is getting the regulation it deserves.
$BTC $ETH
#USNonFarmPayrollReport #USTradeDeficitShrink #CPIWatch #CryptoMarketAnalysis

A majority of crypto projects mimic the work done by Ethereum and amend a few variables.
Dusk Foundation reverted to first principles and posed: What is it that regulated finance requires of consensus?
It was not TPS high or fee low. It was definitiveness, justice and anonymity.
It is time to worry why Consensus Matters More Than You Think
Whatever your consensus mechanism is, it is your blockchain, and you are in charge of the security model, requirements of participation, environmental impact, and the real person controlling the network.
To secure Bitcoin, Proof-of-Work burns electricity to the environment. PoS is concentrated on the largest token owners. De-centralised systems bring in the element of trusted intermediaries.
Each makes tradeoffs. Not many of them are recognised candidly.
The Segregated Byzantine Agreement by Dusk was not intended to be any different. It was created to facilitate a certain thing: permissionless network in which financial institutions can be members of consent without divulging their positions or strategies.
The Issue of the Current Models.
Normal Proof-of-Stake poses transparency issues to institutional stakeholders.
The value of your stake is made open. your verify address is traced through blocks. Your behaviour is studied by your competitors. Vulnerabilities within your infrastructure are discovered by security researchers. The waivers that regulators put in place have some awkward questions regarding custody arrangements.
To the retail users who made a stake of 32 ETH, that is easy enough. It is unacceptable in the case of institutions that are staking millions.
The other delegated systems involves the belief in intermediaries, a move that nullifies the essence of blockchain in terms of offering value.
Dusk required non-permitted participation, institutional quality privacy, and Byzantine failure tolerance at the same time.
byzantine Agreement Architecture: Segregated.
SBA divides the consensus into two different positions:
Block Generators Provisioners.
Block Generators suggest candidate blocks via lottery which is fuelled by "Proof of Blind Bid." They irrevocably commit themselves to DUSK that nobody knows who to stake or the amount of commitment using cryptographic commitments.
On the occasion of being chosen to propose, they demonstrate evidence of holding stake without anonymizing their identity. The network confirms the proof mathematically. Their candidate block passes to the agreement stage provided that they are valid.
Providers authenticate candidate blocks with the help of a voting system based on the committee. They are chosen with respect to weight of the stakeholders, and the choice is cryptographically randomizable yet verifiable.
Centralization is kept out by the segregation. Block proposal and validation differ in their ways of selection, and it becomes exponentially more difficult to have both systems controlled by Byzantine actors.
The reason Blind Bidding Changes Everything
Conventional PoS stake transparency establishes unhealthy incentives.
Massive stakers are clearly targets of attacks. Pools discriminate against small stakers. The allocation of stake is turned into something weaponized during governance battles.
Indicators of Blind Bid kill these vectors by ensuring that the amount of stake remains secret in the bid stage.
The participants seal the value of their stakes on cryptographic hashes which conceal values yet can be verified. They do not deanonymize completely but only after being chosen, they disclose adequate information to demonstrate that the bid is valid.
This brings about fair participation. The chance of a staker with 1, 000 DUSK, as compared with that of a staker with 100, 000 DUSK, without being acquainted with the position of the other staker, is as 1:1.
To institutions, it entails engaging in agreement but not declaring strategy to the market rivals.
Finality That Protests to Be.
Crypto marketing now turned into nea-instant finality.
Dusk SBA offers statistical finality that has very small fork probability. Once the agreement has been reached, that block is final no reorganisation risk, no waiting to get confirmations.
Why this is important to regulated finance: to settle, some certainty is needed
The T+2 method (trade date + two business days) of traditional finance has been attributed in part to the fact that intermediaries take time to reconcile, but also to the fact that finality cannot be attained without legal certainty.
The instant settlement as promised through blockchain can only be effective when the finality is in fact instant and legally binding.
The Byzantine fault tolerance of SBA offers mathematical finality in case less than a third of staked DUSK are controlled by bad actors. The European financial regulations can operate mathematically with certainty. They are unable to deal with probably final unless, there is a reorg.
The Tokenomics Integration
SBA does not only protect the network. It develops economic motivation in accordance with health of the networks.
Block Generators are given 70% block rewards and up to 10% in additional amounts based on certificate credits (unallocated ones are burned). Provisioners divide 10% whereby participation is 5% of validation committee and ratification committee is 5%.
The remaining 10% pays the development treasury of Dusk, so that sustainable protocol evolution is available.
There is a minimum stake requirement of 1,000 DUSK with maturity of 2 epochs (approximately 4320 blocks). There is no limit on dominance by whales, as well as economic cost, which keeps Sybil.
At the addition of stake, 90 percent goes active right away and the 10 percent goes into an inactive condition to allow the exploitation of the compound to be prevented, yet to promote fairness.
The system encourages participation. Lacking votes or offering invalid blocks equates to lack of rewards. The economical condition of networks is beneficial to everyone.
Green Building as Spice, not as Relyance
The whole stack of Dusk gives resource efficiency a priority.
The committee based validation of SBA has the advantage that it does not mandate that every node compute every transaction as is the case of Proof of Work.
Requirement of nodes remains small. But you do not need data centre infrastructure in order to create substantial participation. Easier barriers to entry facilitate decentralisation and lessen the effect on the environment.
This is important to institutions that are subject to ESG scrutiny. Even beneficial blockchain infrastructure that uses less energy than the financial infrastructure would justify itself.
The Competitive Landscape
None of the privacy-centric blockchain has permission-less participation, institutional-grade privacy, and fast finality with custom consensus.
Monero is more focused on privacy of transactions, but does not provide smart contract capabilities of complex financial instruments.
Zcash has shielded transactions, but does not cover consensus level privacy or institutional applications.
Secret Network offers private smart contracts yet applies regular Tendermint consensus and does not anonymize its stake holders.
Dusk created the full stack consensus, transactions, identity with one thing in mind: allowing regulated finance on- chain without adverse effects on privacy or decentralisation.
Why This Matters for $DUSK
The token is no a token government money.
DUSK depicts consensus participation rights. The bigger the stake in it, the better network security, the better finality guarantees, the better institutional confidence.
The securities and transactions of EUR300M in DuskTrade, along with the EURQ stablecoin transactions also rise as the network usage grows, which in turn raises the quantity of third-party demands dApps that require consensus.
The economic flywheel: economic usage is generated and generated to fulfil security needs, security needs are generated and generated to promote staking demand, staking demand is generated and encouraged to promote token value, token value is generated and encouraged to attract additional institutional participants.
SBA is not only technical architecture. It is the starting point of all the other things that Dusk offers.
Lack of it makes privacy a dream. Through it, institutions can now make decisions not to select between compliance and competition to use blockchain.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

Bitcoin kicked off 2026 in familiar territory stuck in a consolidation phase that has traders questioning whether we're setting up for a massive breakout or preparing for a deeper correction. Trading around $91,000 as of January 10, BTC sits roughly 28% below its October 2025 all-time high of $126,000, and the market can't seem to decide which way gravity pulls harder.​
What's fascinating right now is the sheer divergence in expert predictions. We're not talking about minor disagreements these are wildly different scenarios from some of the most respected voices in crypto. Youwei Yang, chief economist at Bit Mining, laid out the widest range I've seen: $75,000 to $225,000 for 2026. That's a 200% spread, and it tells you everything about the uncertainty we're dealing with.​
Carol Alexander from the University of Sussex is calling for a "high-volatility range" between $75,000 and $150,000, with an average around $110,000. Meanwhile, James Butterfill at CoinShares expects Bitcoin to trade between $120,000 and $170,000, but here's the kicker he thinks the real action happens in the second half of the year. That means we might be grinding sideways for months before anything meaningful develops.
From a technical standpoint, the picture is mixed but leaning bearish in the short term. Bitcoin is testing that psychological $90,000 support level after three consecutive sessions of losses. The key resistance zone sits around $92,000-$94,000, and analysts are watching the $100,000 level like hawks because that's where the 200-day exponential moving average lives. Break above that, and the downtrend narrative flips. Fail to hold $90,000, and we could be looking at a retest of $85,000 by month's end.​
Here's what's really weighing on Bitcoin right now: miner profitability is terrible. Mining difficulty dropped 2.6% in early January, which sounds like good news, but it's actually a symptom of how squeezed miners are. With Bitcoin well below $100,000 and energy costs staying elevated, many miners are barely breaking even. When miners can't turn a profit, they're forced to sell their holdings to cover operational costs, and that creates constant sell-side pressure.
My take? Bitcoin is coiling. We're in that frustrating phase where nothing happens until everything happens. The fundamentals institutional infrastructure, regulatory clarity, adoption metrics are stronger than they've ever been. But macro headwinds, miner stress, and technical resistance are real obstacles. I wouldn't be surprised to see us chop around in the $88,000-$94,000 range for the next few weeks before a more definitive move emerges. Just don't get complacent below $90,000.
$BTC #USNonFarmPayrollReport #USTradeDeficitShrink #CPIWatch #BTCVSGOLD #CryptoETFMonth

Tokenization became crypto's favorite buzzword somewhere between NFT mania and the bear market. Everyone promised to put real estate, bonds, and fine art on-chain.​
Most projects failed to ask: Then what?
Dusk Foundation asked. Then spent six years building the answer.​
The Tokenization Theater
You can technically tokenize anything on Ethereum. The legal recognition of that token? That's where fantasy meets concrete walls.​
A tokenized share of commercial real estate means nothing if courts don't recognize blockchain ownership. A digital bond is worthless if regulators consider it an unregistered security.​
This isn't a technical problem. Code can't fix legal frameworks that predate distributed ledgers by decades.​
Dusk attacks this from the opposite direction: build a blockchain that operates within existing regulatory structures while delivering blockchain's efficiency gains.​
What Real-World Assets Actually Need
Asset tokenization requires five things simultaneously and most blockchains deliver two at best.​
First, native issuance. Assets must exist entirely on-chain, not as wrapped versions of off-chain holdings requiring trusted intermediaries. Dusk's infrastructure eliminates central securities depositories while maintaining compliance.
Second, fractional ownership with legal teeth. Dusk's XSC (Confidential Security Token) contract automates the entire asset lifecycle issuance, dividends, voting rights, ownership transfers while maintaining end-user privacy. Everything stays auditable without being publicly visible.​
Third, compliance at protocol level. Most blockchains bolt on KYC/AML as an afterthought. Dusk embeds it through Citadel, their self-sovereign identity protocol using zero-knowledge proofs.​
Fourth, liquidity without leakage. Institutions won't tokenize assets if their competitors can track every trade. Dusk's privacy features protect commercial strategy while satisfying regulatory oversight.​
Fifth, instant finality. Traditional settlement takes T+2 days. Crypto's "near-instant" still means risk until finality. Dusk's Succinct Attestation consensus provides deterministic finality in seconds.​
The NPEX Blueprint
Theory sounds impressive. Execution tells the real story.​
NPEX operates as a regulated Dutch stock exchange with a Multilateral Trading Facility license and European Crowdfunding Service Providers authorization. Since 2020, they've facilitated over €192 million in capital raises for SMEs, connecting 17,500+ active investors.​
Their partnership with Dusk and Quantoz Payments creates something unprecedented: a fully on-chain stock exchange operating under European financial regulations.​
The EURQ stablecoin a MiCA-compliant electronic money token enables euro-denominated settlement without touching traditional banking rails. DuskTrade, launching in 2026, brings listed equities and bonds onto blockchain for compliant trading and settlement.​
This isn't proof-of-concept. It's €300 million of actual securities moving on-chain with full regulatory approval.​
Why Size Matters
The global real-world asset market isn't measured in billions. Try tens of trillions.​
Real estate alone represents massive illiquid value. Private equity, infrastructure debt, intellectual property, fine art assets that historically required massive minimum investments and suffered from terrible liquidity.​
Tokenization promises democratization. Dusk delivers the infrastructure to make that promise legally enforceable.​
By 2030, estimates suggest the asset tokenization market could reach $10 trillion. That's not counting the hundreds of billions in efficiency gains from eliminating intermediaries, reducing settlement times, and automating compliance.​
Early movers in providing compliant infrastructure for this transition don't just capture market share. They define the standards.​
The Citadel Advantage
Privacy-preserving KYC sounds oxymoronic until you understand zero-knowledge proofs.​
Citadel allows users to prove they meet regulatory requirements accredited investor status, jurisdictional eligibility, AML clearance without revealing underlying personal data.​
The verification happens on-chain. The data stays encrypted. Service providers receive mathematical proof of compliance, not databases full of identity documents.​
For financial institutions, this solves a nightmare problem: KYC costs that scale linearly with customer base while creating massive liability from storing sensitive data.​
Dusk's solution: prove compliance without centralizing risk.​
The Institutional Calculus
Banks don't adopt technology because it's innovative. They adopt it because maintaining legacy systems costs more than transitioning.​
Cross-border settlement still involves correspondent banking networks straight out of the 1970s. Securities custody requires layers of intermediaries who each take cuts and introduce counterparty risk. Compliance departments manually reconcile records across fragmented systems.​
Blockchain promises to collapse these inefficiencies. But institutions need more than promises they need regulatory certainty, privacy guarantees, and infrastructure that won't become obsolete in two years.​
Dusk provides all three by building specifically for regulated finance rather than hoping finance adapts to generic blockchain.​
The Uncomfortable Math
At a $26 million market cap, $DUSK is valued below many projects with nothing but whitepapers.​
If even a fraction of the projected $10 trillion RWA tokenization market flows through compliant infrastructure, current valuations seem disconnected from potential utility.​
That's not a price prediction. It's a statement of asymmetry between what Dusk has built and what the market currently prices in.​
Real-world assets need blockchain infrastructure that operates in the real world. Turns out that's harder and rarer than most developers imagined.​
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

Mainnet was launched in September 2024. Six years of building. And the majority is still unaware of the existence of Dusk.
That's about to change
The roadmap 2025 is not a list of possibilities and versions we are considerating. It's shipping product. Real features. Live integrations. The type of development that transforms infrastructure to ecosystems.
And the market yet no prices it.
Hyperstaking: Hyperstaking Smart Contracts
The following sentence is something that does not seem like a revolutionary statement until one reflects on it:
It is now possible to use smart contracts with custom logic to process stakes.
Hyperstaking became operational in mainnet. It is Account Abstraction to stake It implies you can programme your stake to do whatever you want it to do.
Private staking: Stake privately without showing your wallet balance. ZK-proofs confirm that you are of minimum without being broadcasted the amount. Institutions love this. They desire yielding yet competitors are unaware of their ranks.
Referral-based staking: Smart contracts which reward wallets by rewarding new stakers. Develop a staking pool with affiliate-based incentives. Growth through incentives rather than marketing.
Liquid staking derivatives: Turn on your DUSK and get a tokenized depiction, utilise in DeFi even as it keeps staking compensation. Nevertheless, composability without compromising yield.
Yield Boosting: Invest in several assets (DUSK + partner tokens) and receive more yields. Cross-protocol incentives automatically programmed into the staking contract.
This isn't theoretical. Hyperstaking is live. It is now available to build on.
The majority of chains are hard-coded. you earn, you unearn, you earn. That's it. Dusk turned staking into software. Means you can create any financial innovation you can imagine out of proof-of-stake and use Dusk.
Once DeFi has the flexibility on an infrastructure level, bizarre things will occur. Good strange.
Zedger: The Protocol Making RWA Tokenization Boring (In a Good Way).
Zedger Beta Dusk will be tokenizing its assets by Q1 2025.
At this point in time tokenization of a real-world asset is custom. Hire lawyers. Structure the SPV. Create your own smart contracts. Lobby regulatory requirements. One is an independent project in each asset.
Zedger standardizes it. Tokenization-as-a-service. You deliver the thing, Zedger does:
Different jurisdictions compliance templates.KYC that doesn't involve privacy at Citadel.Programmable legal contracts with regulatory authorizations.Lifecycle administration (issue, trading, corporate operations)Connexions with licenced partners (NPEX, custodians).
This offers tokenized asset Shopify. It does not require a blockchain developer to tokenize a real estate asset, bonds, or even equity. You use Zedger.
In the case of business, this eliminates the technical obstacle. To the developers, it offers building blocks that can be composed rather than reinventing the wheels.
Initially, the beta is started with NPEX, 21X and institutional partners with their assets moved onto the block. By mid-2025, Zedger will be dealing with billions of value tokenized.
That's not hype. It was a plan of that sort, named partners, subject to regulation.
Lightspeed: The EVM Layer 2 No One Intended.
Here's where it gets spicy. Dusk is starting EVM-compatible Layer 2 named Lightspeed.
And yet have we not already gone three articles discussing how Dusk is Layer 1 in regulated assets? Why build an L2?
Due to the lack of care over privacy in DeFi. It cares about speed.
Dusk Layer 1 is where the regulated assets are managed. Privacy. Compliance. Security. Those are not without a computational cost ZK-proofs. You are selling expediency at the expense of assurances.
Lightspeed belongs to all the others. DeFi protocols. Gaming. NFTs. Require EVM compatibility and high throughput Use cases Consider settling to Dusk to final state.
The genius? Assets that were issued on Dusk L1 (regulatory covered) will be able to be traded on Lightspeed and then be settled. Regulated issuance. DeFi liquidity. Compliant settlement.
It is the way you bridge the TradFi and DeFi and not lose either of them.
Etherium L2s are spreading liquidity on dozens of chains. Dusk is developing one L2 that intentionally should interface with its L1. Level I vertical integration.
Launch target: Q1 2025. Once it has become live, all Ethereum developers will be able to run on Lightspeed with no code modifications. Metamask works. Hardhat works. The tools are identical.
But you are also relaxing on the infrastructure that is institutional-grade security and compliance. That's differentiation.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

Six years, and that is how much it took a group of cryptographers and blockchain engineers to develop what the traditional finance system has done not even create over decades: a bridge between the required regulatory compliance and real financial freedom.
Pythoners were screaming about freedom and Ethereum developers were in a frenzy to scale, when Dusk Foundation was quietly fixing a problem that most people did not even know was a problem. They were not creating another DeFi casino. These were not releasing another privacy coin to regulatory exile.
They were constructing the infrastructures of the most boring, most profitable and absolutely necessary revolution in finance: regulated asset tokenization.
They eventually became operational on September 20, 2024, after being postponed several times and most projects would not have survived.
The reason why your bank can neither simply use blockchain.
These are the underbelly of crypto adoption that no one is allowed to discuss: institutions are unconcerned with decentralization. They care about liability.
JPMorgan does not need merely smart contracts when they desire to tokenize bonds. They need audit trails. They require working KYC. They should be free without attracting the attention of all regulators in the area of 1000 miles that money laundering is taking place.
Classic blockchains will provide you with an option: complete transparency (goodbye, Ethereum) or complete anonymity (goodbye, regulatory hell). Dusk said "what if we did both?"
Zero-knowledge proofs are not new. Zcash pioneered them. Monero embraced privacy. But Dusk did not do this. They constructed ZK-proofs directly aligned to the European regulations of works, MiFID II and MiCA. They have developed what CEO Emanuele Francioni termed as privacy which considers the actual issues that such regulations address, that of anonymity.
Translation? It will be possible to demonstrate that you are not being compliant or telling everything about everyone.
The NPEX Bombshell
A majority of crypto partnerships are vaporware. We are looking into prospects. "We're in discussions." Corporate speak Zoomcall.
Dusk collaborated with a Dutch stock exchange licensed, NPEX which has been in operation since 2008. Not exploring. Not discussing. Operating. The exchange has both Multilateral Trading Facility license and European Crowdfunding Service Providers license. It has enabled more than EUR200 million funding of 100+ businesses.
This isn't a testnet dream. It is the first securities exchange in Europe that is powered by blockchain.
Think about what that means. Every stock trade. Every bond issuance. All dividend disbursals occurring on-chain, immediately settled, programmable business operations, and regulations embedded in the protocol itself are a thing that can occur.
The old system? Days to settle a trade. Armies of middlemen. Risk of counterparty on all levels. The new system? Seconds. Smart contracts. Open, verifiable and confidential where it counts.
The 17500 active investors at NPEX are not crypto degens. They are real people and they want to spend on the real business. Now they are doing it over a blockchain that most of the population has never heard of.
The Architecture That Makes It possible
Dusk isn't a monolithic Layer 1. It consists of three separate layers that are collaborating:
DuskDS manages the consensus and data availability through Proof-of-Stake. But not just any PoS. They came up with the Succinct Attestation which is a consensus mechanism that aimed at financial compliance. Block generators make 70 percent rewards. The validation is paid to voters. Everyone has skin in the game.
That is interesting at DuskEVM. It is EVM-compatible, and every Solidity developer on Earth can develop here without having to learn a new language. However, it has Hedger, a privacy layer, which encrypts transaction information with the help of zero-knowledge proofs and Fully Homomorphic Encryption.
The developer ecosystem of Ethereum with the privacy of Monero. And you stay compliant.
DuskVM can support high-privacy applications with smart contracts written in Rust. Consider enterprise-level financial applications that require custom logic that the EVM can not support.
This architecture is a resolution of the trilemma that has plagued institutional adoption: interoperability, privacy, compliance. Pick three.
The Real Market Is Bigger Than You Think
And everyone is after the next 100x meme coin. In the meantime, the global derivatives market has a value of its own at 600 trillion. Global bonds? $130 trillion. Stocks? $95 trillion. Intellectual property? $74 trillion.
None of this is on-chain. Yet.
Dusk is not competing with Doge coin. They are in the struggle with SWIFT, Euroclear, and all securities depositories in the world. They are going after the multi-hundred-trillion-dollar market of real assets that really produce real cash flow.
All the RWA hype is on real estate and Dusk is going deeper. Patents. Copyrights. Corporate bonds. Equity. Carbon credits. It may be tokenized in case it has legal rights associated with it, and the token may be programmed to execute the legal rights.
That is what it actually means to bring finance on-chain. Not Unstablecoins yield farming bursting with the collapse of Luna. Not NFTs of cartoon monkeys. Finance system that is functional when the market is boring.
What takes place, when the Tedious Stuffs grow Parabolic
The release of the mainnet in September was not only a technical achievement. It was confirmation that six years of sweating to go through regulatory frameworks, re-write technology stacks and associate with real licensed institutions can be effective.
The Dusk network Post launch, Dusk introduced Hyperstaking a new mechanism allowing smart contracts to use custom staking logic. Prefer consistency with privacy? Done. Referral rewards? Built-in. Liquid staking? It's programmable.
They are introducing Zedger with RWA tokenization and management. EVM-compatible, DeFi at scale Lightspeed. MiCA-compliant payments with DuskPay. A Cordial Systems- institutional-grade custody solution.
And here is the zinger, they are adopting Chainlink CCIP. It implies that tokenized securities on Dusk can cross-chain to Ethereum, Solana, and anywhere across the world. Chainlink DataLink allows NPEX exchange data to feed on-chain. Institutional grade high frequency trading.
It is not a roadmap of possibilities. These characteristics are already in the market.
The Token Economics Do Makes Sense
These 2018 ICO prices were this: Opening price of $DUSK was 0.0404. There is about 486 million tokens of current circulating supply. Maximum supply? Five hundred million emitted over 36 years to stakers, one billion half-billion pre-mainnet.
Minimum staking is 1,000 DUSK. No maximum. Two-epoch maturity period. No penalties for unstaking. Rewards were shared in 70: 20 ratio between block generators and voters. Undistributed rewards are burnt.
The tokenomics is long term oriented. Not pump-and-dump. Not VC reds that crater the price. A 36-year emission plan was based on real network development.
This is infrastructural building. Slowly. Deliberately. Rewards to win the network, not marked in the Coin.
The reason why this is important is more than you think
There is a problem of adoption of crypto. That is not because the technology is not working. Since it is not working with those who do the actual capital allocation at scale.
Uncontrollable money cannot be grabbed by the pension funds. Insurance companies would not consider protocols which lack compliance structures. Things go wrong, and the banks require legal redress.
Dusk built for them. Not they are selling out to TradFi. In a we are actually making it possible, so everything can real world asset can move on-chain, for $500 trillion.
You desire hyperbitcoinization? This is how it happens. Not by substituting fiat with sats. It has made the rails that transfer trillions of dollars so effective that conventional finance has no chance.

Any bond that matures rather than after a period of three days is a victory. Any stock that is 24/7 trading, not 9-to-5, is a win. Any corporate move which performs automatically through smart contract rather than lawyers and accountants is a triumph.
That's the revolution. Not NGU. Utility.
And Dusk will be the only Layer 1 with the purpose to provide it within the framework of European regulations. Privacy, compliance, programmability, are not trade-offs with other features it has, they are features of the only chain.

Bottom Line: As long as we are all betting on stories, Dusk is laying the plumbing in the new financial system. It's not smexy. It's not meme-able. However, once pension funds begin to tokenize bonds and real estate fully transits into on-chain but you will regret not having paid attention at the time that the mainnet was launched.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

Nobody wants their bank balance projected on a Times Square billboard. Yet that's essentially what most blockchains do every transaction, every wallet balance, broadcast to the entire world.
The crypto industry spent years celebrating this radical transparency as a feature. Immutable. Auditable. Trustless. Beautiful words that ignore an inconvenient truth: no serious financial institution will ever put their clients' trades on a public ledger where competitors can front-run positions and regulators can't differentiate between legitimate business and money laundering.
Enter Dusk Network, a blockchain that had the audacity to ask:
what if we built privacy and compliance into the protocol itself, rather than bolting it on later like duct tape on a leaking pipe?
The Transparency Trap
Ethereum changed everything in 2015. Smart contracts meant you could program money, automate agreements, and build entire financial systems without intermediaries. Except there was a problem nobody wanted to talk about everything happened in public.​
Imagine running a hedge fund where every trade you make is visible to every competitor in real-time. Your entry price, your exit strategy, your entire position all public. That's not just inconvenient. It's commercial suicide.​
Traditional finance operates on selective disclosure. Your bank knows your balance. The IRS can audit you. But your neighbor doesn't get to see how much you spent on groceries last Tuesday. This isn't some outdated relic of "old finance" it's a fundamental requirement for any financial system that serves real people and real institutions.
Dusk Network launched its mainnet in September 2024 after six years of development, purpose-built to solve this exact contradiction. Not as an afterthought. Not as a Layer 2 band-aid. From the ground up.​
Zero-Knowledge: The Magic That Isn't Magic
The phrase "zero-knowledge proof" sounds like marketing gibberish. It isn't.
Here's what it actually means, I can prove to you that I know something without revealing what that something is. I can prove I have enough money to buy a house without showing you my bank statements. I can prove a transaction is legitimate without broadcasting it to the world.
Dusk uses a zero-knowledge proof system called PLONK a cryptographic primitive that lets you verify correctness without seeing the underlying data. Think of it like a black box that takes in private information, runs calculations, and spits out a single answer:
"Yes, this is valid" or "No, this is not."​
The Phoenix transaction model, developed by Dusk's team, was the first in the industry to implement privacy-preserving transactions with full security proofs. Zcash tried. They abandoned it. Monero prioritizes privacy but offers no smart contract programmability. Dusk actually pulled it off.​
But here's where it gets interesting:
Privacy alone isn't enough.
The Compliance Contradiction
European regulators aren't stupid. They understand that privacy protects consumers. GDPR literally enshrines data protection as a fundamental right.
But they also understand that unfettered anonymity enables criminals. So they wrote regulations MiCA, MiFID II, the DLT Pilot Regime that demand something seemingly impossible: privacy for users, auditability for regulators.​
Most blockchain projects pick a side. Privacy coins like Monero reject all compliance. Public chains like Ethereum sacrifice all privacy. Dusk said: what if we don't have to choose?​
The solution is called Zero-Knowledge Compliance, or ZKC. Users encrypt their transaction data using their own key. That key is then encrypted using an auditor's key. Through zero-knowledge proofs, users prove that they encrypted everything correctly and followed all the rules without revealing the transaction details to anyone except authorized regulators.​
You get to keep your financial privacy. Regulators get to audit when necessary. Competitors don't get to spy on your trades. Everyone wins except the criminals, who were going to use cash anyway.
Why NPEX Bet Everything on Dusk
In late 2023, NPEX a licensed Dutch stock exchange operating as a Multilateral Trading Facility made a decision that shocked the traditional finance world. They partnered with Dusk to become Europe's first blockchain-powered securities exchange.​
This wasn't some pilot program or proof of concept. NPEX holds legitimate regulatory licenses: MTF, Broker, ECSP, with a DLT Trading and Settlement System license in progress. They facilitate real IPOs for real companies raising real capital. And they chose to build their entire future infrastructure on Dusk.​
Why? Because Dusk offers something no other blockchain can: protocol-level compliance.
On Ethereum, every application has to implement its own compliance separately. One app's KYC doesn't work with another's. You get siloed ecosystems where composability the supposed killer feature of DeFi completely breaks down.​
Dusk embeds compliance into the protocol itself. Single KYC onboarding works across the entire ecosystem. Licensed dApps share the same legal and technical foundation. Regulated assets maintain their compliance characteristics even as they move between applications.​
This is the first decentralized integrated financial stack with regulatory licenses embedded at the blockchain level. Not built on top. Not added later. Foundational.​
The result? NPEX is bringing €300 million in real-world assets on-chain. Not hypothetical tokens. Not speculative NFTs. Actual equities, bonds, and funds that institutional investors already understand and want to buy.
The Road Ahead: DuskTrade and Digital Euros
In November 2025, Dusk launched Hedger Alpha a system that brings confidential transactions to DuskEVM, their Ethereum-compatible execution environment. Developers can now build privacy-preserving applications using Solidity, the programming language they already know, without learning new cryptographic primitives from scratch.​
Coming in Q1 2026: DuskTrade, the first real-world asset trading application built on the NPEX partnership. Imagine buying tokenized shares of a European SME from your wallet, settling instantly, maintaining full self-custody, and doing it all with the same privacy you'd expect from your brokerage account. That's the promise.​
Also launching: integration with EURQ, a MiCA-compliant digital euro issued by Quantoz Payments. Not a stablecoin pegged to the euro. An actual Electronic Money Token with legal tender status, enabling a fully on-chain stock exchange with real regulatory approval.
If this works and that's still a meaningful "if" Dusk could become the rails for a financial system that combines the efficiency of blockchain with the protections people actually need. Privacy without criminality. Compliance without surveillance. Decentralization without chaos.
Wall Street spent decades building systems where only the wealthy could access institutional-grade assets. Crypto promised to democratize finance but delivered volatility and scams instead. Dusk is betting there's a middle path: bring institution-level assets to anyone's wallet, with privacy and compliance built in from day one.
The question isn't whether traditional finance needs blockchain. The question is whether blockchain can finally deliver something traditional finance would actually use. Six years in, Dusk is about to find out if the answer is yes.$DUSK @Dusk #dusk