$BTC $ETH The market has been flat for almost a week now, with Bitcoin hovering around sixty grand, and the altcoin season seems like a distant dream.
Honestly, this kind of market is the most frustrating—it doesn’t drop, but it doesn’t rise either, and funds are just sitting on the sidelines.
But I’ve noticed a trend for quite some time: during sideways periods, funds often start shifting from "trading on emotions" to "trading on fundamentals."
What do I mean by fundamentals? It’s about what the project is actually doing, whether it can generate profit, and if there are use cases for the token.
So, I’m currently more inclined to look at projects that don’t rely on the market's mood. For example, a p i a r y s, which is focused on distributed AI computing power. You don’t need the token to pump to make a profit; the project itself generates revenue from providing computing services, with 90% of that going towards buybacks and burns.
$ H N Y- d 6 b 0 has reduced its total supply from 1 billion to 210 million, and that’s not just talk; it’s backed by actual business activities.
To put it simply—when the market is stagnant, projects with real income and burn mechanisms are more likely to catch the attention of investors.
What do you think? After this round of consolidation, which direction do you think the funds will flow?
#AI
Honestly, this kind of market is the most frustrating—it doesn’t drop, but it doesn’t rise either, and funds are just sitting on the sidelines.
But I’ve noticed a trend for quite some time: during sideways periods, funds often start shifting from "trading on emotions" to "trading on fundamentals."
What do I mean by fundamentals? It’s about what the project is actually doing, whether it can generate profit, and if there are use cases for the token.
So, I’m currently more inclined to look at projects that don’t rely on the market's mood. For example, a p i a r y s, which is focused on distributed AI computing power. You don’t need the token to pump to make a profit; the project itself generates revenue from providing computing services, with 90% of that going towards buybacks and burns.
$ H N Y- d 6 b 0 has reduced its total supply from 1 billion to 210 million, and that’s not just talk; it’s backed by actual business activities.
To put it simply—when the market is stagnant, projects with real income and burn mechanisms are more likely to catch the attention of investors.
What do you think? After this round of consolidation, which direction do you think the funds will flow?
#AI