๐Ÿšจ I'm about to say something that many won't share.

I believe memecoins aren't the problem.

They're a symptom.

Every cycle, I see people complaining:

โŒ "Memecoins are destroying crypto."

โŒ "Money should go to serious projects."

โŒ "People aren't doing their research anymore."

But I see something different.

I see that capital always seeks two things:

๐Ÿ“ˆ Returns.
๐Ÿง  Narratives.

Memecoins grab attention.

But attention doesn't always capture long-term value.

That's why my question is never:

"What's the next memecoin?"

My question is:

"What function will still be necessary in 10 years?"

๐Ÿฆ Bitcoin stores wealth.

๐Ÿชช Digital identity will still exist.

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Tokenized assets will still exist.

๐Ÿง  Artificial intelligence will keep growing.

โšก Infrastructure will still be needed.

Narratives change.

Functions survive.

That's why I'm not worried about a memecoin skyrocketing 1,000%.

I'm concerned about missing the chance to identify an indispensable function before the rest of the market.

๐Ÿ”ฅ Now for the tough question:

If you could hold ONE single position for the next 10 years...

Would you choose a narrative or a function?

๐Ÿ‘‡ I want to read your responses.

In my case, I hold a tiny portion of my portfolio in $DOGE and $BANANAS31 just in case something extraordinary happens; these cryptocurrencies' behavior heavily relies on the strength of their respective communities and the growth of the overall market capital.