I've been watching how @Bedrock evolves for several days now, and something interesting stands out: a big part of the conversation revolves around the utility of the assets, not just the returns. In BTCFi, I increasingly see the importance of understanding what happens behind a strategy instead of just looking at a number.
What catches my eye about Bedrock 2.0 is the focus on providing more context so users can better evaluate the options available. For me, transparency and information are key factors when it comes to participating in any protocol related to Bitcoin.
I'm still digging into how the ecosystem evolves and the role that $BR can play as BTCFi continues to develop. #Bedrock
What do you consider more important when evaluating a protocol: transparency, liquidity, or the utility of the asset?
What catches my eye about Bedrock 2.0 is the focus on providing more context so users can better evaluate the options available. For me, transparency and information are key factors when it comes to participating in any protocol related to Bitcoin.
I'm still digging into how the ecosystem evolves and the role that $BR can play as BTCFi continues to develop. #Bedrock
What do you consider more important when evaluating a protocol: transparency, liquidity, or the utility of the asset?