deepseek

🚨 Bill Gates Predicted It Early: U. S. Tech Limitations Didn't Hinder China — They Boosted It.
The effort to technologically cut off China has hit a critical point. Before current data confirmed it, Bill Gates cautioned that isolating China wouldn’t diminish its strength — it would compel it to innovate more quickly. The figures from 2024 to 2025 clearly illustrate this now.

Instead of experiencing a slowdown, China adjusted — and sped up its progress.

Here’s what truly transpired:

🔹 Huawei Did Not Surrender — It Reinvented Itself
In the face of extensive sanctions, Huawei allocated over 1.1 trillion yuan to research and development over a decade. What was the result?

The Kirin chipset for the Mate 60 Pro

HarmonyOS, now operating on more than 800 million devices
The alleged technological “blockade” failed to be effective.

🔹 SMIC Grew Rather Than Shrunk
Instead of diminishing, SMIC has seen its revenue double since 2018, rising to become the second-largest semiconductor foundry in the world by revenue.

🔹 AI Chose a Unique Course
Although advanced chips faced limitations, China improved its software and training efficiencies. DeepSeek-R1 showcased that first-class AI models can be developed at a small fraction of the cost found in Silicon Valley, debunking the belief that cutting-edge AI mandates unrestricted access to U. S. hardware.

🔹 Consequences for the U. S. Tech Industry
This situation is not one-sided. Companies like NVIDIA, Qualcomm, and Intel are feeling the impact. Market analysts predict that the U. S. could potentially forfeit as much as 18% of the global semiconductor market share as the decoupling process speeds up. Meanwhile, China’s exports of integrated circuits surged by 17.4% in 2024, despite growing job pressures in Silicon Valley.

The key point:
Creativity is not confined by geography. When obstacles are erected, competitors don’t give up — they develop new solutions. China has swiftly transitioned from reliance to self-sufficiency, quicker than many anticipated.

$RIVER $GPS $PIPPIN

Thus, the critical question lingers:
Are we witnessing the decline of U. S. technological supremacy, or are we entering a new, multipolar landscape in technology?

Let’s discuss. 👇

#DeepSeek #TechDecoupling #GlobalMarkets #InnovationShift

This was never just politics — it was an economic experiment. And the results are in.
Years ago, Bill Gates warned that trying to suppress China’s technological rise would do the opposite: force self-reliance, accelerate innovation, and break global dependencies. Fast-forward to 2024–2025, and the data proves him right.
Instead of slowing down, China adapted, optimized, and scaled faster than anyone expected.
Here’s what actually happened 👇
🔹 Huawei Didn’t Fall — It Reinvented Itself
Despite relentless sanctions, Huawei invested over ¥1.1 trillion into R&D across a decade. The outcome?
• The Mate 60 Pro powered by a domestically developed Kirin chip
• HarmonyOS, now running on 800M+ devices, breaking free from Western ecosystems
The so-called “blockade” didn’t stop Huawei — it hardened it.
🔹 SMIC’s Silent Expansion
While many predicted collapse, SMIC doubled its revenue since 2018, emerging as the world’s 2nd-largest foundry by revenue.
Restrictions didn’t erase capacity — they redirected it inward.
🔹 AI Restrictions Sparked a Cost Revolution
U.S. chip bans were meant to freeze AI progress. Instead, China pivoted.
Models like DeepSeek-R1 proved that cutting-edge AI can be trained at a fraction of Silicon Valley’s cost, rewriting the economics of artificial intelligence.
🔹 The Real Losers? U.S. Tech Giants
Decoupling comes with consequences.
• NVIDIA, Intel, and Qualcomm face shrinking access to the world’s largest market
• Analysts warn the U.S. could lose up to 18% of global semiconductor market share
• Meanwhile, China’s IC exports jumped 17.4% in 2024
🔹 The Bigger Picture
Innovation doesn’t disappear when you build walls — it reroutes.
China moved from import-dependent to self-controlled at record speed, proving that technological sovereignty is no longer optional in a fragmented world.
The Bottom Line:
You can’t contain innovation forever. Every restriction creates a workaround, every barrier builds a new competitor, and every sanction accelerates independence.
💡 Is the era of U.S. tech dominance fading — or simply transforming?
Drop your thoughts below 👇
$RIVER $GPS $PIPPIN
#TechWar #AIRevolution #GlobalMarkets #RiskAssets #Geopolitics #DeepSeek

În timp ce mulțimea de retail se lasă purtată de FOMO în monede care deja au crescut cu 500%, eu caut următoarele mari jucării AI în spațiul micro-cap. 🕵️‍♂️📈
Misiunea mea este simplă:
✅ Identifică bijuterii AI cu potențial ridicat sub 100k USD Capitalizare de piață.
✅ Intră înainte ca volumul masiv să înceapă.
✅ Împărtășește Alpha cu urmăritorii mei.
​Concentrarea actuală: DeepSeek ($DEEPSEEK).
La o Capitalizare de piață de 1.7K USD, potențialul de creștere este matematic nebunesc. E devreme, e riscant, dar acolo se întâmplă 100x. 🤖🧠

Ieri seară am văzut raportul tehnic de la DeepSeek și am dat o palmă pe coapsă când am văzut că a învins gigantii din Silicon Valley cu un cost de 1/20. Aceasta nu este doar o cutremurare în lumea AI, este pur și simplu o critică la adresa actualei piste a lanțurilor publice.
Uitați-vă la aceste lanțuri publice L1 pe care le avem, toată lumea vorbește despre „platforme de calcul general”, pretinzând că vor servi simultan DeFi, logistică, sănătate, socializare. Asta seamănă foarte mult cu acele restaurante de tip „fast-food” care oferă „mâncare chinezescă + mâncare occidentală + grătar”, cu un meniu foarte gros, dar fără un singur fel de mâncare care să fie bun. Rezultatul este că avem nenumărate „lanțuri publice universale” greoaie, dar ne este greu chiar și să rulăm un joc H5 simplu.