Há 6027 posições de empréstimo na @0xfluid na Ethereum neste | DMH no Binance Square

Página Inicial

Artigos Populares

Favoritos e Gostos

Centro de Criador

--

Há 6027 posições de empréstimo na @0xfluid na Ethereum neste momento 
Há mais de 7000 usuários na lista de espera do Jupiter Lend em apenas algumas horas

Aviso Legal: inclui opiniões de terceiros. Não se trata de aconselhamento financeiro. Poderá incluir conteúdos patrocinados. Consulta os Termos e Condições.

SOL

174,97

-5.14%

ETH

2.550,48

-6.06%

BTC

108.190,28

-2.66%

405

0

Fica a saber as últimas notícias sobre criptomoedas

⚡️ Participa nas mais recentes discussões sobre criptomoedas

💬 Interage com os teus criadores preferidos

👍 Desfruta de conteúdos que sejam do teu interesse

E-mail/Número de telefone

Criador Relevante

@Square-Creator-46e716381

Explorar Mais do Criador

Are you watching Solana Accelerate stream?

--

What did @dYdX do wrong? dydx gave a bigger airdrop than Hyperliquid back then ($2b vs $1.6B initial value) dydx had 5 years to build the most competitive product, and generated more than $530m in revenue dydx also built its own chain, so it had all the tools to make the best-performing matching engine What did they miss, and what can they do to become competitive again?

--

Whoever is market making this must be able to buy a position back, which is not a profitable thing to do

--

One thing that surprises me the most is that there is no single common opinion about AMMs, LP profitability, LVR, arbitrage, and other things. IMO, there's a misconception that LPs are competing against traders, or that AMMs lose because traders win. This isn't how LPing works. LPs aren’t betting against traders - they’re selling volatility. The key risk they take is not trader skill but asset movement, and they're compensated with fees for providing that exposure. LPing is conceptually similar to options selling: in options, you receive a premium upfront based on implied volatility, whereas LPs earn fees continuously based on realized volatility. LPs earn yield (fees) in exchange for taking on the risk that prices will move away from their position. Arbitrage does not imply LP loss. It’s a necessary part of the mechanism. LPs do not care if they are selling to informed or uninformed flow, they care about their liquidity staying in range and earning fees. And while LPs could theoretically capture some arbitrage profit via MEV recapture, it's not the core design intent. The fact that billions of dollars remain deployed in Uniswap, even when some analyses show LP losses, suggests that the LPs understand they’re being paid for volatility exposure, not for making directional bets, and they are successfully hedging this exposure. As the DEX infrastructure matures, LPs will have better tools to manage/hedge their exposure. Also, considering that options are one of the most traded financial instruments in the real world, the future of decentralized LPing remains strong, despite the timeline is doomposting on LPing.

--

I wish more automated yield aggregators supported $GHO pool on Fluid the rates are often very high here, currently 36% APR on $GHO

--

Últimas Notícias

Whale Activity: Significant AAVE Purchase Follows WBTC Sale

--

Cetus Hacker Bounty Structure Criticized by Blockchain Investigator

--

Tesla's Bitcoin Holdings Reach $1.24 Billion in Value

--

Bitcoin Bull Market Reshapes Investment Portfolio Position

--

Cryptocurrency Trader Adjusts Positions Amid Market Downturn

--

Preferências de cookies

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Preferências de cookies