Eu gostaria que mais agregadores de rendimento automatizados | DMH no Binance Square

Página Inicial

Artigos Populares

Favoritos e Gostos

Centro de Criador

--

Eu gostaria que mais agregadores de rendimento automatizados suportassem o pool $GHO no Fluid
oas taxas aqui são frequentemente muito altas, atualmente 36% APR no $GHO

Aviso Legal: inclui opiniões de terceiros. Não se trata de aconselhamento financeiro. Poderá incluir conteúdos patrocinados. Consulta os Termos e Condições.

78

0

Fica a saber as últimas notícias sobre criptomoedas

⚡️ Participa nas mais recentes discussões sobre criptomoedas

💬 Interage com os teus criadores preferidos

👍 Desfruta de conteúdos que sejam do teu interesse

E-mail/Número de telefone

Criador Relevante

@Square-Creator-46e716381

Explorar Mais do Criador

There are 6027 borrowing positions on @0xfluid on Ethereum right now There are more than 7000 users on the waitlist on Jupiter Lend in just a few hours

--

Are you watching Solana Accelerate stream?

--

What did @dYdX do wrong? dydx gave a bigger airdrop than Hyperliquid back then ($2b vs $1.6B initial value) dydx had 5 years to build the most competitive product, and generated more than $530m in revenue dydx also built its own chain, so it had all the tools to make the best-performing matching engine What did they miss, and what can they do to become competitive again?

--

Whoever is market making this must be able to buy a position back, which is not a profitable thing to do

--

One thing that surprises me the most is that there is no single common opinion about AMMs, LP profitability, LVR, arbitrage, and other things. IMO, there's a misconception that LPs are competing against traders, or that AMMs lose because traders win. This isn't how LPing works. LPs aren’t betting against traders - they’re selling volatility. The key risk they take is not trader skill but asset movement, and they're compensated with fees for providing that exposure. LPing is conceptually similar to options selling: in options, you receive a premium upfront based on implied volatility, whereas LPs earn fees continuously based on realized volatility. LPs earn yield (fees) in exchange for taking on the risk that prices will move away from their position. Arbitrage does not imply LP loss. It’s a necessary part of the mechanism. LPs do not care if they are selling to informed or uninformed flow, they care about their liquidity staying in range and earning fees. And while LPs could theoretically capture some arbitrage profit via MEV recapture, it's not the core design intent. The fact that billions of dollars remain deployed in Uniswap, even when some analyses show LP losses, suggests that the LPs understand they’re being paid for volatility exposure, not for making directional bets, and they are successfully hedging this exposure. As the DEX infrastructure matures, LPs will have better tools to manage/hedge their exposure. Also, considering that options are one of the most traded financial instruments in the real world, the future of decentralized LPing remains strong, despite the timeline is doomposting on LPing.

--

Últimas Notícias

Hyper Foundation's Official Twitter Account Compromised

--

Bitcoin(BTC) Surpasses 108,000 USDT with a Narrowed 2.30% Decrease in 24 Hours

--

USDC Circulation Increases by 800 Million in Recent Week

--

BNB Surpasses 670 USDT with a Narrowed 2.84% Decrease in 24 Hours

--

Bitcoin Transaction Fees Surge Over 50% to $6.43M as Price Hits New High

--

Preferências de cookies

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Termos e Condições da Plataforma

Preferências de cookies