Ethereum has made two really unique formative choices, interrelated with each other:

(1) favoring liveness over 'safety'

(2) rejecting "interventionism" after the DAO hack incident (i.e., the DAO hack was the one and only exception)

these are really strong choices both architecturally and socially to achieve cryptoanarchist type results, and Ethereum's main "competitors" made very different choices that means imo they can't really be cryptoanarchist

there are other related choices like hardware requirements for validators..and in-protocol slashing and inactivity leaks; it all adds up to a very unique picture for Ethereum vs every other smart contract blockchain