CoindooOfficial
730Posty
CoindooOfficial
Zgłoś
Zablokuj użytkownika
0 Obserwowani
53 Obserwujący
410 Polubione
9 Udostępnione
Posty
Article
Zobacz tłumaczenie
White House Advisor Says Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Announcement is Coming SoonPatrick Witt, Executive Director of the President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, has confirmed that a White House announcement on the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is imminent, and the work behind it has been running quietly for months.
Key Takeaways
Patrick Witt confirms SBR announcement coming.Work never stopped despite Clarity Act dominating headlines.Harry Jong, Witt's deputy, led the interagency process.Stephen Miller's team and DECOSP involved in execution.
What Witt said and what it means
In an interview shared by Bitcoin Magazine, Witt confirmed in the interview that a White House announcement on the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is forthcoming, describing the current state of the work as "legally sound, properly safeguarding the assets." He acknowledged that the SBR had become the lesser-covered priority while the Clarity Act dominated crypto policy headlines but stated that work on the reserve never stopped and was running through a parallel interagency process.
Witt's description of the executive order as "a starting gun" rather than the policy itself is the framing that the market has consistently missed: the executive order signed months ago tasked agencies to do the legal work, and the announcement Witt is previewing is the output of that work, legal memos drafted, authorities confirmed, interagency coordination advanced, not the beginning of a new process but the completion of the one the executive order started.
The interagency process involved drafting legal memos, determining what authorities exist within the executive branch to establish the reserve, and confirming whether additional legislative authorization is required. Witt indicated that Harry Jong, his deputy, has led that coordination alongside Stephen Miller's team and DECOSP, the Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, whose office is responsible for ensuring all signed executive orders are being followed through.
Why the US Marshals theft matters to the announcement
The US Marshals theft of tier-two crypto assets that Witt cites as a proof point is not incidental context: it is the specific event that demonstrated the US government's existing asset custody infrastructure is inadequate for Bitcoin, and the safeguarding framework being developed for the SBR is the government's response to that demonstrated vulnerability rather than a precaution against a hypothetical one. The government holds more crypto assets on its balance sheet than most market participants track, seized assets from criminal cases accumulate continuously, as is publicly documented through US Marshals auction records — and Witt's framing suggests the SBR announcement will include a custody and safeguarding framework rather than simply a policy declaration about holding Bitcoin.
What two simultaneous tracks mean for US crypto policy
Witt's preview describes a SBR advancing through executive channels while the Clarity Act moves through the legislative process. The SBR developing through executive channels while the Clarity Act moves through legislative ones means two separate tracks of US crypto policy are advancing simultaneously, and the announcement Witt previews would establish a Bitcoin reserve policy without waiting for the legislative clarity that the Clarity Act is still working to provide.
The distinction matters because executive action can be reversed by a subsequent administration while legislation is more durable. Witt himself raises the question of whether legislation is still important even given executive order authority — acknowledging that the SBR's long-term legal foundation would benefit from Congressional backing even if executive action can establish it in the near term. An SBR announcement built on executive authority alone would be a significant market signal but a structurally different one from a legislatively grounded reserve.
https://twitter.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2056400337485857056
A White House announcement on the SBR materializing within thirty days of Witt's interview, including a specific custody framework and a named safeguarding mechanism, would confirm the interagency process has reached the conclusion Witt described and the executive track is delivering on the executive order's mandate.
A failure to produce an announcement within sixty days, or a White House statement deprioritizing the SBR in favor of waiting for legislative action through the Clarity Act process, would indicate the executive track has stalled and the window Witt referenced has closed without resolution.
#bitcoin
White House Advisor Says Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Announcement is Coming Soon
Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, has confirmed that a White House announcement on the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is imminent, and the work behind it has been running quietly for months.
Key Takeaways
Patrick Witt confirms SBR announcement coming.Work never stopped despite Clarity Act dominating headlines.Harry Jong, Witt's deputy, led the interagency process.Stephen Miller's team and DECOSP involved in execution.
What Witt said and what it means
In an interview shared by Bitcoin Magazine, Witt confirmed in the interview that a White House announcement on the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is forthcoming, describing the current state of the work as "legally sound, properly safeguarding the assets." He acknowledged that the SBR had become the lesser-covered priority while the Clarity Act dominated crypto policy headlines but stated that work on the reserve never stopped and was running through a parallel interagency process.
Witt's description of the executive order as "a starting gun" rather than the policy itself is the framing that the market has consistently missed: the executive order signed months ago tasked agencies to do the legal work, and the announcement Witt is previewing is the output of that work, legal memos drafted, authorities confirmed, interagency coordination advanced, not the beginning of a new process but the completion of the one the executive order started.
The interagency process involved drafting legal memos, determining what authorities exist within the executive branch to establish the reserve, and confirming whether additional legislative authorization is required. Witt indicated that Harry Jong, his deputy, has led that coordination alongside Stephen Miller's team and DECOSP, the Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, whose office is responsible for ensuring all signed executive orders are being followed through.
Why the US Marshals theft matters to the announcement
The US Marshals theft of tier-two crypto assets that Witt cites as a proof point is not incidental context: it is the specific event that demonstrated the US government's existing asset custody infrastructure is inadequate for Bitcoin, and the safeguarding framework being developed for the SBR is the government's response to that demonstrated vulnerability rather than a precaution against a hypothetical one. The government holds more crypto assets on its balance sheet than most market participants track, seized assets from criminal cases accumulate continuously, as is publicly documented through US Marshals auction records — and Witt's framing suggests the SBR announcement will include a custody and safeguarding framework rather than simply a policy declaration about holding Bitcoin.
What two simultaneous tracks mean for US crypto policy
Witt's preview describes a SBR advancing through executive channels while the Clarity Act moves through the legislative process. The SBR developing through executive channels while the Clarity Act moves through legislative ones means two separate tracks of US crypto policy are advancing simultaneously, and the announcement Witt previews would establish a Bitcoin reserve policy without waiting for the legislative clarity that the Clarity Act is still working to provide.
The distinction matters because executive action can be reversed by a subsequent administration while legislation is more durable. Witt himself raises the question of whether legislation is still important even given executive order authority — acknowledging that the SBR's long-term legal foundation would benefit from Congressional backing even if executive action can establish it in the near term. An SBR announcement built on executive authority alone would be a significant market signal but a structurally different one from a legislatively grounded reserve.
https://twitter.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2056400337485857056
A White House announcement on the SBR materializing within thirty days of Witt's interview, including a specific custody framework and a named safeguarding mechanism, would confirm the interagency process has reached the conclusion Witt described and the executive track is delivering on the executive order's mandate.
A failure to produce an announcement within sixty days, or a White House statement deprioritizing the SBR in favor of waiting for legislative action through the Clarity Act process, would indicate the executive track has stalled and the window Witt referenced has closed without resolution.
#bitcoin
Key Takeaways
Patrick Witt confirms SBR announcement coming.Work never stopped despite Clarity Act dominating headlines.Harry Jong, Witt's deputy, led the interagency process.Stephen Miller's team and DECOSP involved in execution.
What Witt said and what it means
In an interview shared by Bitcoin Magazine, Witt confirmed in the interview that a White House announcement on the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is forthcoming, describing the current state of the work as "legally sound, properly safeguarding the assets." He acknowledged that the SBR had become the lesser-covered priority while the Clarity Act dominated crypto policy headlines but stated that work on the reserve never stopped and was running through a parallel interagency process.
Witt's description of the executive order as "a starting gun" rather than the policy itself is the framing that the market has consistently missed: the executive order signed months ago tasked agencies to do the legal work, and the announcement Witt is previewing is the output of that work, legal memos drafted, authorities confirmed, interagency coordination advanced, not the beginning of a new process but the completion of the one the executive order started.
The interagency process involved drafting legal memos, determining what authorities exist within the executive branch to establish the reserve, and confirming whether additional legislative authorization is required. Witt indicated that Harry Jong, his deputy, has led that coordination alongside Stephen Miller's team and DECOSP, the Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, whose office is responsible for ensuring all signed executive orders are being followed through.
Why the US Marshals theft matters to the announcement
The US Marshals theft of tier-two crypto assets that Witt cites as a proof point is not incidental context: it is the specific event that demonstrated the US government's existing asset custody infrastructure is inadequate for Bitcoin, and the safeguarding framework being developed for the SBR is the government's response to that demonstrated vulnerability rather than a precaution against a hypothetical one. The government holds more crypto assets on its balance sheet than most market participants track, seized assets from criminal cases accumulate continuously, as is publicly documented through US Marshals auction records — and Witt's framing suggests the SBR announcement will include a custody and safeguarding framework rather than simply a policy declaration about holding Bitcoin.
What two simultaneous tracks mean for US crypto policy
Witt's preview describes a SBR advancing through executive channels while the Clarity Act moves through the legislative process. The SBR developing through executive channels while the Clarity Act moves through legislative ones means two separate tracks of US crypto policy are advancing simultaneously, and the announcement Witt previews would establish a Bitcoin reserve policy without waiting for the legislative clarity that the Clarity Act is still working to provide.
The distinction matters because executive action can be reversed by a subsequent administration while legislation is more durable. Witt himself raises the question of whether legislation is still important even given executive order authority — acknowledging that the SBR's long-term legal foundation would benefit from Congressional backing even if executive action can establish it in the near term. An SBR announcement built on executive authority alone would be a significant market signal but a structurally different one from a legislatively grounded reserve.
https://twitter.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2056400337485857056
A White House announcement on the SBR materializing within thirty days of Witt's interview, including a specific custody framework and a named safeguarding mechanism, would confirm the interagency process has reached the conclusion Witt described and the executive track is delivering on the executive order's mandate.
A failure to produce an announcement within sixty days, or a White House statement deprioritizing the SBR in favor of waiting for legislative action through the Clarity Act process, would indicate the executive track has stalled and the window Witt referenced has closed without resolution.
#bitcoin
38
Article
$1,07 miliarda wypływów z kryptowalut zakończyło sześć tygodni napływów, a USA były tego głównym sprawcąProdukty inwestycyjne w aktywa cyfrowe odnotowały 1,07 miliarda dolarów netto wypływów w zeszłym tygodniu, kończąc sześciotygodniowy pozytywny trend. Geograficzny podział tych wypływów to najważniejsza liczba w raporcie.
Kluczowe wnioski
Łączne tygodniowe wypływy: -1,074 miliarda dolarów - pierwszy negatywny tydzień od siedmiu, trzeci największy w 2026 roku.
Bitcoin: -982 miliony dolarów wypływu tygodniowego, 91,4% całości, ale tylko 0,78% z 126,6 miliarda dolarów AUM.
Ethereum: -249 milionów dolarów wypływu tygodniowego, 1,41% z 17,69 miliarda dolarów AUM.
XRP: +67,6 miliona dolarów napływów. Solana: +55,1 miliona dolarów. Obie przyspieszają w ostatnich tygodniach.
Co zakończyło sześciotygodniowy trend
$1,07 miliarda wypływów z kryptowalut zakończyło sześć tygodni napływów, a USA były tego głównym sprawcą
Produkty inwestycyjne w aktywa cyfrowe odnotowały 1,07 miliarda dolarów netto wypływów w zeszłym tygodniu, kończąc sześciotygodniowy pozytywny trend. Geograficzny podział tych wypływów to najważniejsza liczba w raporcie.
Kluczowe wnioski
Łączne tygodniowe wypływy: -1,074 miliarda dolarów - pierwszy negatywny tydzień od siedmiu, trzeci największy w 2026 roku.
Bitcoin: -982 miliony dolarów wypływu tygodniowego, 91,4% całości, ale tylko 0,78% z 126,6 miliarda dolarów AUM.
Ethereum: -249 milionów dolarów wypływu tygodniowego, 1,41% z 17,69 miliarda dolarów AUM.
XRP: +67,6 miliona dolarów napływów. Solana: +55,1 miliona dolarów. Obie przyspieszają w ostatnich tygodniach.
Co zakończyło sześciotygodniowy trend
Kluczowe wnioski
Łączne tygodniowe wypływy: -1,074 miliarda dolarów - pierwszy negatywny tydzień od siedmiu, trzeci największy w 2026 roku.
Bitcoin: -982 miliony dolarów wypływu tygodniowego, 91,4% całości, ale tylko 0,78% z 126,6 miliarda dolarów AUM.
Ethereum: -249 milionów dolarów wypływu tygodniowego, 1,41% z 17,69 miliarda dolarów AUM.
XRP: +67,6 miliona dolarów napływów. Solana: +55,1 miliona dolarów. Obie przyspieszają w ostatnich tygodniach.
Co zakończyło sześciotygodniowy trend
73
Article
Ethereum gospodarzem 72% rynku tokenizowanych ETF, który wzrósł o 17 000% w ciągu rokuRynek tokenizowanych ETF ma 651 produktów, 441,9 miliona USD kapitalizacji rynkowej, a Ethereum trzyma prawie trzy czwarte tej wartości. W obliczu 20 bilionowego przemysłu ETF te liczby opowiadają jednocześnie dwie historie.
Kluczowe Wnioski
Zszyty rynek ETF: 441,9 mln USD z 651 ETF i 6 emitentów.
Globalny rynek ETF: około 20 bilionów USD - udział tokenizowany to 0,0022%.
Ondo Finance: 74,9% udziału emitenta, 330,9 mln USD.
Ethereum: 72,6% udziału w łańcuchu, 321,0 mln USD.
Trzy główne aktywa: IVVon (67,3 mln USD), IBITon (43,8 mln USD), SPYon (41,7 mln USD).
Ethereum gospodarzem 72% rynku tokenizowanych ETF, który wzrósł o 17 000% w ciągu roku
Rynek tokenizowanych ETF ma 651 produktów, 441,9 miliona USD kapitalizacji rynkowej, a Ethereum trzyma prawie trzy czwarte tej wartości. W obliczu 20 bilionowego przemysłu ETF te liczby opowiadają jednocześnie dwie historie.
Kluczowe Wnioski
Zszyty rynek ETF: 441,9 mln USD z 651 ETF i 6 emitentów.
Globalny rynek ETF: około 20 bilionów USD - udział tokenizowany to 0,0022%.
Ondo Finance: 74,9% udziału emitenta, 330,9 mln USD.
Ethereum: 72,6% udziału w łańcuchu, 321,0 mln USD.
Trzy główne aktywa: IVVon (67,3 mln USD), IBITon (43,8 mln USD), SPYon (41,7 mln USD).
Kluczowe Wnioski
Zszyty rynek ETF: 441,9 mln USD z 651 ETF i 6 emitentów.
Globalny rynek ETF: około 20 bilionów USD - udział tokenizowany to 0,0022%.
Ondo Finance: 74,9% udziału emitenta, 330,9 mln USD.
Ethereum: 72,6% udziału w łańcuchu, 321,0 mln USD.
Trzy główne aktywa: IVVon (67,3 mln USD), IBITon (43,8 mln USD), SPYon (41,7 mln USD).
61
Article
Zobacz tłumaczenie
Arthur Hayes Cuts his Bitcoin Target and Explains Why AI is the ReasonArthur Hayes has revised his Bitcoin price target and the reason he gives is not that his framework has changed but that the pace of money creation has not kept up with what his framework requires.
Key Takeaways
Hayes revises Bitcoin target: $500,000 down to approximately $125,000 within one year.Framework unchanged: Bitcoin tracks fiat supply growth globally.Q1 AI scare: Hayes reads BTC decline as a liquidity signal, not a crypto event.
The revised target and the unchanged framework
Asked whether he had changed his $500,000 Bitcoin target, Hayes confirmed the revision to approximately $125,000 within a year. The reduction sounds significant in isolation, but Hayes frames it as a pace adjustment. His underlying framework remains the same: Bitcoin is, in his words, a combination of a tech stock and a liquidity instrument, with value determined by fiat supply growth. If more fiat exists in the future than today, Bitcoin will be worth more. If money printing accelerates globally, through central banks and commercial banks, his target follows from that premise.
Revising a price target from $500,000 to $125,000 is a 75% reduction in magnitude, but Hayes frames it as a pace adjustment rather than a thesis reversal: the same money-printing framework that supported $500,000 still supports $125,000, just on a slower timeline than he originally projected. The question his revision raises is not whether the framework is right but whether the pace of monetary expansion will reach the level his target requires within the one-year window he is now working with.
https://twitter.com/wublockchain/status/2056132653296848916?s=46
What Hayes thinks the Q1 decline was actually signaling
The more analytically significant part of Hayes’ remarks is his reading of the Q1 2026 market. AI stocks, particularly SaaS companies in the United States, fell sharply in the first quarter. Bitcoin fell alongside them. Most market participants read this as a risk-off event driven by macro uncertainty. Hayes reads it differently.
Hayes’ reading of the Q1 Bitcoin decline as a liquidity signal rather than a crypto-specific event inverts the conventional interpretation: where most analysts saw a risk-off selloff driven by macro fear, Hayes saw Bitcoin functioning as a forward indicator of insufficient monetary creation relative to the deflationary pressure being generated by AI-driven job displacement. His argument is that AI is creating a deflationary force, job losses and an inability to service debts, that requires a monetary response to offset. Bitcoin declining was, in his framework, the market pricing in the absence of that response rather than the presence of macro fear.
He described this as Bitcoin signaling that there was “not enough money being created to forestall this AI deflationary event”, a statement that places Bitcoin in the role of a macro liquidity gauge rather than a speculative asset responding to sentiment.
What the framework predicts from here
The internal logic of Hayes’ framework contains a testable prediction: if central banks and commercial banks accelerate money creation in response to AI-driven deflation, Bitcoin will recover toward his $125,000 target, and if they do not, the current price level is Bitcoin continuing to signal that the liquidity required to validate that target has not yet arrived. The framework is falsifiable in both directions within the one-year window Hayes has specified.
The risk to the thesis is the same risk Hayes implicitly acknowledges by revising from $500,000 to $125,000: monetary expansion can be slower or more uneven than the thesis requires, and Bitcoin’s price reflects the pace of that expansion in real time. If AI deflation intensifies faster than central banks respond, the signal Bitcoin is currently sending could remain bearish for longer than a one-year target accommodates.
#crypto
Arthur Hayes Cuts his Bitcoin Target and Explains Why AI is the Reason
Arthur Hayes has revised his Bitcoin price target and the reason he gives is not that his framework has changed but that the pace of money creation has not kept up with what his framework requires.
Key Takeaways
Hayes revises Bitcoin target: $500,000 down to approximately $125,000 within one year.Framework unchanged: Bitcoin tracks fiat supply growth globally.Q1 AI scare: Hayes reads BTC decline as a liquidity signal, not a crypto event.
The revised target and the unchanged framework
Asked whether he had changed his $500,000 Bitcoin target, Hayes confirmed the revision to approximately $125,000 within a year. The reduction sounds significant in isolation, but Hayes frames it as a pace adjustment. His underlying framework remains the same: Bitcoin is, in his words, a combination of a tech stock and a liquidity instrument, with value determined by fiat supply growth. If more fiat exists in the future than today, Bitcoin will be worth more. If money printing accelerates globally, through central banks and commercial banks, his target follows from that premise.
Revising a price target from $500,000 to $125,000 is a 75% reduction in magnitude, but Hayes frames it as a pace adjustment rather than a thesis reversal: the same money-printing framework that supported $500,000 still supports $125,000, just on a slower timeline than he originally projected. The question his revision raises is not whether the framework is right but whether the pace of monetary expansion will reach the level his target requires within the one-year window he is now working with.
https://twitter.com/wublockchain/status/2056132653296848916?s=46
What Hayes thinks the Q1 decline was actually signaling
The more analytically significant part of Hayes’ remarks is his reading of the Q1 2026 market. AI stocks, particularly SaaS companies in the United States, fell sharply in the first quarter. Bitcoin fell alongside them. Most market participants read this as a risk-off event driven by macro uncertainty. Hayes reads it differently.
Hayes’ reading of the Q1 Bitcoin decline as a liquidity signal rather than a crypto-specific event inverts the conventional interpretation: where most analysts saw a risk-off selloff driven by macro fear, Hayes saw Bitcoin functioning as a forward indicator of insufficient monetary creation relative to the deflationary pressure being generated by AI-driven job displacement. His argument is that AI is creating a deflationary force, job losses and an inability to service debts, that requires a monetary response to offset. Bitcoin declining was, in his framework, the market pricing in the absence of that response rather than the presence of macro fear.
He described this as Bitcoin signaling that there was “not enough money being created to forestall this AI deflationary event”, a statement that places Bitcoin in the role of a macro liquidity gauge rather than a speculative asset responding to sentiment.
What the framework predicts from here
The internal logic of Hayes’ framework contains a testable prediction: if central banks and commercial banks accelerate money creation in response to AI-driven deflation, Bitcoin will recover toward his $125,000 target, and if they do not, the current price level is Bitcoin continuing to signal that the liquidity required to validate that target has not yet arrived. The framework is falsifiable in both directions within the one-year window Hayes has specified.
The risk to the thesis is the same risk Hayes implicitly acknowledges by revising from $500,000 to $125,000: monetary expansion can be slower or more uneven than the thesis requires, and Bitcoin’s price reflects the pace of that expansion in real time. If AI deflation intensifies faster than central banks respond, the signal Bitcoin is currently sending could remain bearish for longer than a one-year target accommodates.
#crypto
Key Takeaways
Hayes revises Bitcoin target: $500,000 down to approximately $125,000 within one year.Framework unchanged: Bitcoin tracks fiat supply growth globally.Q1 AI scare: Hayes reads BTC decline as a liquidity signal, not a crypto event.
The revised target and the unchanged framework
Asked whether he had changed his $500,000 Bitcoin target, Hayes confirmed the revision to approximately $125,000 within a year. The reduction sounds significant in isolation, but Hayes frames it as a pace adjustment. His underlying framework remains the same: Bitcoin is, in his words, a combination of a tech stock and a liquidity instrument, with value determined by fiat supply growth. If more fiat exists in the future than today, Bitcoin will be worth more. If money printing accelerates globally, through central banks and commercial banks, his target follows from that premise.
Revising a price target from $500,000 to $125,000 is a 75% reduction in magnitude, but Hayes frames it as a pace adjustment rather than a thesis reversal: the same money-printing framework that supported $500,000 still supports $125,000, just on a slower timeline than he originally projected. The question his revision raises is not whether the framework is right but whether the pace of monetary expansion will reach the level his target requires within the one-year window he is now working with.
https://twitter.com/wublockchain/status/2056132653296848916?s=46
What Hayes thinks the Q1 decline was actually signaling
The more analytically significant part of Hayes’ remarks is his reading of the Q1 2026 market. AI stocks, particularly SaaS companies in the United States, fell sharply in the first quarter. Bitcoin fell alongside them. Most market participants read this as a risk-off event driven by macro uncertainty. Hayes reads it differently.
Hayes’ reading of the Q1 Bitcoin decline as a liquidity signal rather than a crypto-specific event inverts the conventional interpretation: where most analysts saw a risk-off selloff driven by macro fear, Hayes saw Bitcoin functioning as a forward indicator of insufficient monetary creation relative to the deflationary pressure being generated by AI-driven job displacement. His argument is that AI is creating a deflationary force, job losses and an inability to service debts, that requires a monetary response to offset. Bitcoin declining was, in his framework, the market pricing in the absence of that response rather than the presence of macro fear.
He described this as Bitcoin signaling that there was “not enough money being created to forestall this AI deflationary event”, a statement that places Bitcoin in the role of a macro liquidity gauge rather than a speculative asset responding to sentiment.
What the framework predicts from here
The internal logic of Hayes’ framework contains a testable prediction: if central banks and commercial banks accelerate money creation in response to AI-driven deflation, Bitcoin will recover toward his $125,000 target, and if they do not, the current price level is Bitcoin continuing to signal that the liquidity required to validate that target has not yet arrived. The framework is falsifiable in both directions within the one-year window Hayes has specified.
The risk to the thesis is the same risk Hayes implicitly acknowledges by revising from $500,000 to $125,000: monetary expansion can be slower or more uneven than the thesis requires, and Bitcoin’s price reflects the pace of that expansion in real time. If AI deflation intensifies faster than central banks respond, the signal Bitcoin is currently sending could remain bearish for longer than a one-year target accommodates.
#crypto
76
Article
Bitcoin spada poniżej $77,000 na dwóch agresywnych skokach sprzedażyBitcoin spadł poniżej $77,000, z dwoma osobnymi skokami wolumenu sprzedaży takerów powyżej $1 miliarda, które napędziły ten ruch, a codzienny RSI przeszedł poniżej 50 po raz pierwszy od początku odbicia w lutym.
Kluczowe Wnioski
BTC na poziomie $76,851.
MA200 na poziomie $81,462: opór, $4,610 powyżej aktualnej ceny.
MA50 na poziomie $75,640: najbliższe wsparcie, $1,211 poniżej aktualnej ceny.
RSI na poziomie 44.64, sygnał na 58.94: różnica 14.30 punktów, pierwszy odczyt poniżej 50 od odbicia.
Dwa skoki sprzedaży takerów na Binance: $1.5B 15 maja, $1.1B gdy cena spadła poniżej $77,000.
Bitcoin spada poniżej $77,000 na dwóch agresywnych skokach sprzedaży
Bitcoin spadł poniżej $77,000, z dwoma osobnymi skokami wolumenu sprzedaży takerów powyżej $1 miliarda, które napędziły ten ruch, a codzienny RSI przeszedł poniżej 50 po raz pierwszy od początku odbicia w lutym.
Kluczowe Wnioski
BTC na poziomie $76,851.
MA200 na poziomie $81,462: opór, $4,610 powyżej aktualnej ceny.
MA50 na poziomie $75,640: najbliższe wsparcie, $1,211 poniżej aktualnej ceny.
RSI na poziomie 44.64, sygnał na 58.94: różnica 14.30 punktów, pierwszy odczyt poniżej 50 od odbicia.
Dwa skoki sprzedaży takerów na Binance: $1.5B 15 maja, $1.1B gdy cena spadła poniżej $77,000.
Kluczowe Wnioski
BTC na poziomie $76,851.
MA200 na poziomie $81,462: opór, $4,610 powyżej aktualnej ceny.
MA50 na poziomie $75,640: najbliższe wsparcie, $1,211 poniżej aktualnej ceny.
RSI na poziomie 44.64, sygnał na 58.94: różnica 14.30 punktów, pierwszy odczyt poniżej 50 od odbicia.
Dwa skoki sprzedaży takerów na Binance: $1.5B 15 maja, $1.1B gdy cena spadła poniżej $77,000.
75
Article
Zdecentralizowane Akcje Osiągają $1,5B przy 40x Wzroście, ale Dwaj Emitenci Posiadają 89% RynkuRynek zdecentralizowanych akcji osiągnął $1,5 miliarda w kapitalizacji rynkowej onchain, rosnąc około 40 razy w ciągu jednego roku. Koncentracja za tą liczbą to to, czego nie pokazuje główny wynik.
Kluczowe informacje
Zdecentralizowane akcje na rynku onchain mają kapitalizację rynkową: $1,5B, około 40x w skali roku.
2,649 zdecentralizowanych akcji śledzonych na 10 łańcuchach i 11 emitentach.
Ondo Finance: 63,1% udziału w rynku, $963,3M.
xStocks: 26,4% udziału w rynku, $402,7M.
Koncentracja emitentów za liczbą $1,5B
Dane Token Terminal dotyczące zdecentralizowanych akcji pokazują łączną kapitalizację rynkową onchain wynoszącą $1,5 miliarda na 2,649 zdecentralizowanych akcjach i 11 emitentach. Roczna stopa wzrostu wynosząca około 40x sprawia, że to jedna z najszybciej rosnących kategorii aktywów onchain pod względem kapitalizacji.
Zdecentralizowane Akcje Osiągają $1,5B przy 40x Wzroście, ale Dwaj Emitenci Posiadają 89% Rynku
Rynek zdecentralizowanych akcji osiągnął $1,5 miliarda w kapitalizacji rynkowej onchain, rosnąc około 40 razy w ciągu jednego roku. Koncentracja za tą liczbą to to, czego nie pokazuje główny wynik.
Kluczowe informacje
Zdecentralizowane akcje na rynku onchain mają kapitalizację rynkową: $1,5B, około 40x w skali roku.
2,649 zdecentralizowanych akcji śledzonych na 10 łańcuchach i 11 emitentach.
Ondo Finance: 63,1% udziału w rynku, $963,3M.
xStocks: 26,4% udziału w rynku, $402,7M.
Koncentracja emitentów za liczbą $1,5B
Dane Token Terminal dotyczące zdecentralizowanych akcji pokazują łączną kapitalizację rynkową onchain wynoszącą $1,5 miliarda na 2,649 zdecentralizowanych akcjach i 11 emitentach. Roczna stopa wzrostu wynosząca około 40x sprawia, że to jedna z najszybciej rosnących kategorii aktywów onchain pod względem kapitalizacji.
Kluczowe informacje
Zdecentralizowane akcje na rynku onchain mają kapitalizację rynkową: $1,5B, około 40x w skali roku.
2,649 zdecentralizowanych akcji śledzonych na 10 łańcuchach i 11 emitentach.
Ondo Finance: 63,1% udziału w rynku, $963,3M.
xStocks: 26,4% udziału w rynku, $402,7M.
Koncentracja emitentów za liczbą $1,5B
Dane Token Terminal dotyczące zdecentralizowanych akcji pokazują łączną kapitalizację rynkową onchain wynoszącą $1,5 miliarda na 2,649 zdecentralizowanych akcjach i 11 emitentach. Roczna stopa wzrostu wynosząca około 40x sprawia, że to jedna z najszybciej rosnących kategorii aktywów onchain pod względem kapitalizacji.
190
Article
225K ETH trafiło do Binance w jeden dzień: Największy wpływ od 2023Ponad 225 000 ETH przeniesione do Binance w ciągu jednego dnia w maju 2026, a 7-dniowa średnia ruchoma za tym skokiem to sygnał, który umiejscawia to wydarzenie w dłuższym trendzie.
Kluczowe Wnioski
225,5K ETH wpływ w ciągu jednego dnia do Binance: najwyższy od maja 2023.
7-dniowa średnia netto przepływów na poziomie 64,9K ETH: najwyższa od września 2022.
Cena ETH wynosi około 2 100 USD w momencie zbierania danych.
Trzy możliwe interpretacje: realizacja zysków, defensywne wyjście lub zabezpieczenie pochodnych.
Obydwa rekordy pobite jednocześnie: wydarzenie i trend potwierdzone razem.
225K ETH trafiło do Binance w jeden dzień: Największy wpływ od 2023
Ponad 225 000 ETH przeniesione do Binance w ciągu jednego dnia w maju 2026, a 7-dniowa średnia ruchoma za tym skokiem to sygnał, który umiejscawia to wydarzenie w dłuższym trendzie.
Kluczowe Wnioski
225,5K ETH wpływ w ciągu jednego dnia do Binance: najwyższy od maja 2023.
7-dniowa średnia netto przepływów na poziomie 64,9K ETH: najwyższa od września 2022.
Cena ETH wynosi około 2 100 USD w momencie zbierania danych.
Trzy możliwe interpretacje: realizacja zysków, defensywne wyjście lub zabezpieczenie pochodnych.
Obydwa rekordy pobite jednocześnie: wydarzenie i trend potwierdzone razem.
Kluczowe Wnioski
225,5K ETH wpływ w ciągu jednego dnia do Binance: najwyższy od maja 2023.
7-dniowa średnia netto przepływów na poziomie 64,9K ETH: najwyższa od września 2022.
Cena ETH wynosi około 2 100 USD w momencie zbierania danych.
Trzy możliwe interpretacje: realizacja zysków, defensywne wyjście lub zabezpieczenie pochodnych.
Obydwa rekordy pobite jednocześnie: wydarzenie i trend potwierdzone razem.
65
Article
Ile Solany naprawdę posiadają jej największe korporacyjne podmioty?Tabela skarbcowa Solany ma lidera oraz cztery firmy, które są tak blisko siebie, że praktycznie konkurują o to samo miejsce.
Kluczowe Wnioski
Forward Industries: 6,979,967 SOL o wartości 606,52 mln USD.
Upexi: 2,400,000 SOL o wartości 208,55 mln USD.
DeFi Development Corp: 2,223,074 SOL o wartości 193,17 mln USD.
Firma Solana: 2,200,000 SOL o wartości 191,17 mln USD.
Sharps Technology: 2,140,000 SOL o wartości 185,96 mln USD.
Lider i luka, którą stworzył
Forward Industries posiada 6,979,967 SOL o wartości 606,52 miliona USD, co stanowi około 2,9 razy więcej niż drugi w rankingu posiadacz. Luka 397,97 miliona USD między Forward Industries a Upexi na drugim miejscu jest 17,6 razy większa niż rozbieżność 22,59 miliona USD oddzielająca miejsca od drugiego do piątego, co oznacza, że tabela ma dwa strukturalnie różne segmenty: jedna firma w swojej kategorii oraz cztery firmy skutecznie związane z miejscem wiceprzewodniczącego. Jakiekolwiek znaczące akumulacje w jednym kwartale przez którąkolwiek z czterech zgrupowanych firm całkowicie przetasują miejsca od drugiego do piątego.
Ile Solany naprawdę posiadają jej największe korporacyjne podmioty?
Tabela skarbcowa Solany ma lidera oraz cztery firmy, które są tak blisko siebie, że praktycznie konkurują o to samo miejsce.
Kluczowe Wnioski
Forward Industries: 6,979,967 SOL o wartości 606,52 mln USD.
Upexi: 2,400,000 SOL o wartości 208,55 mln USD.
DeFi Development Corp: 2,223,074 SOL o wartości 193,17 mln USD.
Firma Solana: 2,200,000 SOL o wartości 191,17 mln USD.
Sharps Technology: 2,140,000 SOL o wartości 185,96 mln USD.
Lider i luka, którą stworzył
Forward Industries posiada 6,979,967 SOL o wartości 606,52 miliona USD, co stanowi około 2,9 razy więcej niż drugi w rankingu posiadacz. Luka 397,97 miliona USD między Forward Industries a Upexi na drugim miejscu jest 17,6 razy większa niż rozbieżność 22,59 miliona USD oddzielająca miejsca od drugiego do piątego, co oznacza, że tabela ma dwa strukturalnie różne segmenty: jedna firma w swojej kategorii oraz cztery firmy skutecznie związane z miejscem wiceprzewodniczącego. Jakiekolwiek znaczące akumulacje w jednym kwartale przez którąkolwiek z czterech zgrupowanych firm całkowicie przetasują miejsca od drugiego do piątego.
Kluczowe Wnioski
Forward Industries: 6,979,967 SOL o wartości 606,52 mln USD.
Upexi: 2,400,000 SOL o wartości 208,55 mln USD.
DeFi Development Corp: 2,223,074 SOL o wartości 193,17 mln USD.
Firma Solana: 2,200,000 SOL o wartości 191,17 mln USD.
Sharps Technology: 2,140,000 SOL o wartości 185,96 mln USD.
Lider i luka, którą stworzył
Forward Industries posiada 6,979,967 SOL o wartości 606,52 miliona USD, co stanowi około 2,9 razy więcej niż drugi w rankingu posiadacz. Luka 397,97 miliona USD między Forward Industries a Upexi na drugim miejscu jest 17,6 razy większa niż rozbieżność 22,59 miliona USD oddzielająca miejsca od drugiego do piątego, co oznacza, że tabela ma dwa strukturalnie różne segmenty: jedna firma w swojej kategorii oraz cztery firmy skutecznie związane z miejscem wiceprzewodniczącego. Jakiekolwiek znaczące akumulacje w jednym kwartale przez którąkolwiek z czterech zgrupowanych firm całkowicie przetasują miejsca od drugiego do piątego.
160
Article
Badania Binance: 75 miliardów dolarów w nielegalnej kryptowalucie jest uwięzionych na łańcuchu i nie może się wydostaćTrwały zapis blockchaina miał uczynić kryptowalutę przejrzystą. Najnowsze dane z badań Binance pokazują, że również uczynił przychody przestępcze strukturalnie niemożliwymi do prania na dużą skalę.
Kluczowe wnioski
Ponad 75 miliardów dolarów w nielegalnej kryptowalucie uwięzionych na łańcuchu.
Nielegalne fundusze wzrosły o 28% w 2025 roku w porównaniu do 2024: mniej udało się skutecznie wyprać.
Miksery ograniczone do 10 milionów dolarów dziennie: oczyszczenie zatoru zajmie ponad 20 lat.
Ponad 80% nielegalnych funduszy przeniosło się do downstream wallets, a nie na oryginalny adres.
Co wykres mówi o akumulacji
Badania Binance: 75 miliardów dolarów w nielegalnej kryptowalucie jest uwięzionych na łańcuchu i nie może się wydostać
Trwały zapis blockchaina miał uczynić kryptowalutę przejrzystą. Najnowsze dane z badań Binance pokazują, że również uczynił przychody przestępcze strukturalnie niemożliwymi do prania na dużą skalę.
Kluczowe wnioski
Ponad 75 miliardów dolarów w nielegalnej kryptowalucie uwięzionych na łańcuchu.
Nielegalne fundusze wzrosły o 28% w 2025 roku w porównaniu do 2024: mniej udało się skutecznie wyprać.
Miksery ograniczone do 10 milionów dolarów dziennie: oczyszczenie zatoru zajmie ponad 20 lat.
Ponad 80% nielegalnych funduszy przeniosło się do downstream wallets, a nie na oryginalny adres.
Co wykres mówi o akumulacji
Kluczowe wnioski
Ponad 75 miliardów dolarów w nielegalnej kryptowalucie uwięzionych na łańcuchu.
Nielegalne fundusze wzrosły o 28% w 2025 roku w porównaniu do 2024: mniej udało się skutecznie wyprać.
Miksery ograniczone do 10 milionów dolarów dziennie: oczyszczenie zatoru zajmie ponad 20 lat.
Ponad 80% nielegalnych funduszy przeniosło się do downstream wallets, a nie na oryginalny adres.
Co wykres mówi o akumulacji
42
Article
Trzy sygnały on-chain pokazują, dlaczego to może być najpłytsza korekta BitcoinaTrzy niezależne źródła danych on-chain opublikowane w tym tygodniu mierzą aktualną korektę Bitcoina z różnych perspektyw i dochodzą do tego samego wniosku, a wniosek ma strukturalne wyjaśnienie, którego żadne z nich nie podaje osobno.
Kluczowe informacje
Relatywna, niezrealizowana strata BTC wynosi około 0,2: najniższy odczyt w historii Bitcoina.
Jeśli $60,000 utrzyma się jako najniższy punkt cyklu, to będzie to najpłytszy rynek niedźwiedzia w historii.
Zyski i straty wieloryba STH zbliżają się do punktu równowagi: możliwy shift z shortowania na hodlowanie.
Skorygowany MVRV pozostaje w strefie byka.
Trzy sygnały on-chain pokazują, dlaczego to może być najpłytsza korekta Bitcoina
Trzy niezależne źródła danych on-chain opublikowane w tym tygodniu mierzą aktualną korektę Bitcoina z różnych perspektyw i dochodzą do tego samego wniosku, a wniosek ma strukturalne wyjaśnienie, którego żadne z nich nie podaje osobno.
Kluczowe informacje
Relatywna, niezrealizowana strata BTC wynosi około 0,2: najniższy odczyt w historii Bitcoina.
Jeśli $60,000 utrzyma się jako najniższy punkt cyklu, to będzie to najpłytszy rynek niedźwiedzia w historii.
Zyski i straty wieloryba STH zbliżają się do punktu równowagi: możliwy shift z shortowania na hodlowanie.
Skorygowany MVRV pozostaje w strefie byka.
Kluczowe informacje
Relatywna, niezrealizowana strata BTC wynosi około 0,2: najniższy odczyt w historii Bitcoina.
Jeśli $60,000 utrzyma się jako najniższy punkt cyklu, to będzie to najpłytszy rynek niedźwiedzia w historii.
Zyski i straty wieloryba STH zbliżają się do punktu równowagi: możliwy shift z shortowania na hodlowanie.
Skorygowany MVRV pozostaje w strefie byka.
83
Article
ETH spada poniżej $2,200: Na co zwrócić uwagę teraz?Ethereum osiągnęło dno swojego opadającego kanału 4-godzinnego, w tym samym czasie, gdy dzienna MA50 przekroczyła cenę, a te dwa warunki nie są niezależne: jeden określa, gdzie znajduje się ETH, a drugi określa, co musi pokonać, aby iść wyżej.
Kluczowe Wnioski
ETH po $2,193.
MA50 zmieniło się z wsparcia na opór po tym, jak cena spadła poniżej.
Ali Charts: ETH na dnie kanału 4H, czekam na odbicie do $2,280 lub $2,390..
MA50 po $2,254 znajduje się między obecną ceną a pierwszym celem $2,280.
MA100 po $2,149 znajduje się $30 poniżej dna kanału na poziomie $2,180.
ETH spada poniżej $2,200: Na co zwrócić uwagę teraz?
Ethereum osiągnęło dno swojego opadającego kanału 4-godzinnego, w tym samym czasie, gdy dzienna MA50 przekroczyła cenę, a te dwa warunki nie są niezależne: jeden określa, gdzie znajduje się ETH, a drugi określa, co musi pokonać, aby iść wyżej.
Kluczowe Wnioski
ETH po $2,193.
MA50 zmieniło się z wsparcia na opór po tym, jak cena spadła poniżej.
Ali Charts: ETH na dnie kanału 4H, czekam na odbicie do $2,280 lub $2,390..
MA50 po $2,254 znajduje się między obecną ceną a pierwszym celem $2,280.
MA100 po $2,149 znajduje się $30 poniżej dna kanału na poziomie $2,180.
Kluczowe Wnioski
ETH po $2,193.
MA50 zmieniło się z wsparcia na opór po tym, jak cena spadła poniżej.
Ali Charts: ETH na dnie kanału 4H, czekam na odbicie do $2,280 lub $2,390..
MA50 po $2,254 znajduje się między obecną ceną a pierwszym celem $2,280.
MA100 po $2,149 znajduje się $30 poniżej dna kanału na poziomie $2,180.
1
325
Article
SUI spada w kierunku strefy wielorybów po odrzuceniu szczytów rajdu z majaSUI oddało większość swojego rajdu z maja i obecnie znajduje się między dwoma wyraźnie określonymi poziomami, z danymi o wielkości zleceń on-chain identyfikującymi wsparcie poniżej i strukturą średniej ruchomej identyfikującą opór powyżej.
Kluczowe wnioski
SUI po $1.0912, w dół 0.77%, MA50 na poziomie $0.9690, MA100 na poziomie $0.9595.
MA200 na poziomie $1.2947: opór górny, $0.2035 powyżej bieżącej ceny.
RSI na poziomie 53.82, sygnał na 62.88: rozspread 9.06 punktów, momentum osłabia się.
Zlecenia wielorybów najgęstsze w strefie $0.90–$1.00: dane o wielkości zleceń CryptoQuant.
SUI spada w kierunku strefy wielorybów po odrzuceniu szczytów rajdu z maja
SUI oddało większość swojego rajdu z maja i obecnie znajduje się między dwoma wyraźnie określonymi poziomami, z danymi o wielkości zleceń on-chain identyfikującymi wsparcie poniżej i strukturą średniej ruchomej identyfikującą opór powyżej.
Kluczowe wnioski
SUI po $1.0912, w dół 0.77%, MA50 na poziomie $0.9690, MA100 na poziomie $0.9595.
MA200 na poziomie $1.2947: opór górny, $0.2035 powyżej bieżącej ceny.
RSI na poziomie 53.82, sygnał na 62.88: rozspread 9.06 punktów, momentum osłabia się.
Zlecenia wielorybów najgęstsze w strefie $0.90–$1.00: dane o wielkości zleceń CryptoQuant.
Kluczowe wnioski
SUI po $1.0912, w dół 0.77%, MA50 na poziomie $0.9690, MA100 na poziomie $0.9595.
MA200 na poziomie $1.2947: opór górny, $0.2035 powyżej bieżącej ceny.
RSI na poziomie 53.82, sygnał na 62.88: rozspread 9.06 punktów, momentum osłabia się.
Zlecenia wielorybów najgęstsze w strefie $0.90–$1.00: dane o wielkości zleceń CryptoQuant.
136
Article
Bitcoin spada do 79 000 USD po zetknięciu SMA200 i wygaśnięcia opcjiBitcoin osiągnął 82 000 USD po głosowaniu w Senacie nad ustawą Clarity Act, a następnie gwałtownie się odwrócił, a poziom, na którym zatrzymał się rajd, nie był przypadkowy.
Kluczowe informacje
BTC na poziomie 79 234 USD, w dół o 2,29% w ciągu dnia, najwyższy poziom sesji 81 664 USD
SMA200 na poziomie 81 957 USD: najwyższy poziom sesji zatrzymał się 293 USD poniżej tego poziomu
Deribit BTC max pain: 80 000 USD. Stosunek Put/Call: 0,55. Wartość nominalna: 2,01 miliarda USD
RSI na poziomie 52,62, sygnał na poziomie 62,47: rozpiętość 9,85 punktów, momentum złamane
Opcje wygasły dzisiaj o 08:00 UTC: 2,63 miliarda USD łącznie dla BTC i ETH
Gdzie zatrzymał się rajd i dlaczego
Bitcoin spada do 79 000 USD po zetknięciu SMA200 i wygaśnięcia opcji
Bitcoin osiągnął 82 000 USD po głosowaniu w Senacie nad ustawą Clarity Act, a następnie gwałtownie się odwrócił, a poziom, na którym zatrzymał się rajd, nie był przypadkowy.
Kluczowe informacje
BTC na poziomie 79 234 USD, w dół o 2,29% w ciągu dnia, najwyższy poziom sesji 81 664 USD
SMA200 na poziomie 81 957 USD: najwyższy poziom sesji zatrzymał się 293 USD poniżej tego poziomu
Deribit BTC max pain: 80 000 USD. Stosunek Put/Call: 0,55. Wartość nominalna: 2,01 miliarda USD
RSI na poziomie 52,62, sygnał na poziomie 62,47: rozpiętość 9,85 punktów, momentum złamane
Opcje wygasły dzisiaj o 08:00 UTC: 2,63 miliarda USD łącznie dla BTC i ETH
Gdzie zatrzymał się rajd i dlaczego
Kluczowe informacje
BTC na poziomie 79 234 USD, w dół o 2,29% w ciągu dnia, najwyższy poziom sesji 81 664 USD
SMA200 na poziomie 81 957 USD: najwyższy poziom sesji zatrzymał się 293 USD poniżej tego poziomu
Deribit BTC max pain: 80 000 USD. Stosunek Put/Call: 0,55. Wartość nominalna: 2,01 miliarda USD
RSI na poziomie 52,62, sygnał na poziomie 62,47: rozpiętość 9,85 punktów, momentum złamane
Opcje wygasły dzisiaj o 08:00 UTC: 2,63 miliarda USD łącznie dla BTC i ETH
Gdzie zatrzymał się rajd i dlaczego
47
Article
Telcoin prowadzi w cotygodniowych największych zyskach CMC, podczas gdy nazwy AI dominują w pierwszej szóstceCotygodniowa lista największych zysków na CoinMarketCap za tydzień kończący się 15 maja pokazuje dwie oddzielne historie, które działają jednocześnie w tej samej tabeli.
Kluczowe Wnioski
Telcoin +76.21%: prowadzi tabelę z przewagą 33.71 punktów nad drugim w rankingu Sahara AI.
Sahara AI +42.50%, BUILDon +32.66%, Kite +29.83%: trzy nazwy AI w pierwszej szóstce.
Injective +29.00%: tygodniowy zysk potwierdza, że trwały ruch nie był jednorazowym skokiem.
Sui +20.02%: jedyny aktyw, który przekracza $1B kapitalizacji rynkowej, największy absolutny ruch w dolarach.
Co prowadzenie Telcoina w tabeli ujawnia
Telcoin prowadzi w cotygodniowych największych zyskach CMC, podczas gdy nazwy AI dominują w pierwszej szóstce
Cotygodniowa lista największych zysków na CoinMarketCap za tydzień kończący się 15 maja pokazuje dwie oddzielne historie, które działają jednocześnie w tej samej tabeli.
Kluczowe Wnioski
Telcoin +76.21%: prowadzi tabelę z przewagą 33.71 punktów nad drugim w rankingu Sahara AI.
Sahara AI +42.50%, BUILDon +32.66%, Kite +29.83%: trzy nazwy AI w pierwszej szóstce.
Injective +29.00%: tygodniowy zysk potwierdza, że trwały ruch nie był jednorazowym skokiem.
Sui +20.02%: jedyny aktyw, który przekracza $1B kapitalizacji rynkowej, największy absolutny ruch w dolarach.
Co prowadzenie Telcoina w tabeli ujawnia
Kluczowe Wnioski
Telcoin +76.21%: prowadzi tabelę z przewagą 33.71 punktów nad drugim w rankingu Sahara AI.
Sahara AI +42.50%, BUILDon +32.66%, Kite +29.83%: trzy nazwy AI w pierwszej szóstce.
Injective +29.00%: tygodniowy zysk potwierdza, że trwały ruch nie był jednorazowym skokiem.
Sui +20.02%: jedyny aktyw, który przekracza $1B kapitalizacji rynkowej, największy absolutny ruch w dolarach.
Co prowadzenie Telcoina w tabeli ujawnia
221
Article
Bitcoin utrzymuje 8-letni niski poziom na giełdzie, podczas gdy podaż Ethereum rośnieDwa aktywa bliskie historycznie niskim poziomom podaży na giełdach poruszają się w przeciwnych kierunkach, a wykresy netflow wyjaśniają dlaczego.
Kluczowe informacje
Podaż BTC na giełdach: 5.6%, najniższy poziom od 2018 roku, stabilny.
Podaż ETH na giełdach: 4.6%, wzrost z 4.2% sprzed dziesięciu dni.
Oba wciąż blisko rekordowo niskich poziomów, ale rozchodzą się kierunkowo.
Skok inflow ETH z 10 maja: około 240K ETH, największa słupka na wykresie.
Aktualny netflow BTC: -967.7 BTC. Aktualny netflow ETH: -14.2K ETH.
Co pokazują procenty podaży
Procent całkowitej podaży każdego aktywa trzymanej na znanych portfelach giełdowych to jeden z czystszych sygnałów behawioralnych w analizie on-chain: rosnąca podaż oznacza, że posiadacze przenoszą monety w kierunku płynności i potencjalnej sprzedaży, spadająca podaż oznacza odwrotnie. Podwójny wykres aktywów Santiment śledzący tę metrykę dla BTC i ETH, codziennie aktualizowany przez Sanbase i obejmujący okres od maja 2025 do maja 2026, pokazuje dwie linie, które spadły razem przez większość roku, zanim rozeszły się w maju 2026.
Bitcoin utrzymuje 8-letni niski poziom na giełdzie, podczas gdy podaż Ethereum rośnie
Dwa aktywa bliskie historycznie niskim poziomom podaży na giełdach poruszają się w przeciwnych kierunkach, a wykresy netflow wyjaśniają dlaczego.
Kluczowe informacje
Podaż BTC na giełdach: 5.6%, najniższy poziom od 2018 roku, stabilny.
Podaż ETH na giełdach: 4.6%, wzrost z 4.2% sprzed dziesięciu dni.
Oba wciąż blisko rekordowo niskich poziomów, ale rozchodzą się kierunkowo.
Skok inflow ETH z 10 maja: około 240K ETH, największa słupka na wykresie.
Aktualny netflow BTC: -967.7 BTC. Aktualny netflow ETH: -14.2K ETH.
Co pokazują procenty podaży
Procent całkowitej podaży każdego aktywa trzymanej na znanych portfelach giełdowych to jeden z czystszych sygnałów behawioralnych w analizie on-chain: rosnąca podaż oznacza, że posiadacze przenoszą monety w kierunku płynności i potencjalnej sprzedaży, spadająca podaż oznacza odwrotnie. Podwójny wykres aktywów Santiment śledzący tę metrykę dla BTC i ETH, codziennie aktualizowany przez Sanbase i obejmujący okres od maja 2025 do maja 2026, pokazuje dwie linie, które spadły razem przez większość roku, zanim rozeszły się w maju 2026.
Kluczowe informacje
Podaż BTC na giełdach: 5.6%, najniższy poziom od 2018 roku, stabilny.
Podaż ETH na giełdach: 4.6%, wzrost z 4.2% sprzed dziesięciu dni.
Oba wciąż blisko rekordowo niskich poziomów, ale rozchodzą się kierunkowo.
Skok inflow ETH z 10 maja: około 240K ETH, największa słupka na wykresie.
Aktualny netflow BTC: -967.7 BTC. Aktualny netflow ETH: -14.2K ETH.
Co pokazują procenty podaży
Procent całkowitej podaży każdego aktywa trzymanej na znanych portfelach giełdowych to jeden z czystszych sygnałów behawioralnych w analizie on-chain: rosnąca podaż oznacza, że posiadacze przenoszą monety w kierunku płynności i potencjalnej sprzedaży, spadająca podaż oznacza odwrotnie. Podwójny wykres aktywów Santiment śledzący tę metrykę dla BTC i ETH, codziennie aktualizowany przez Sanbase i obejmujący okres od maja 2025 do maja 2026, pokazuje dwie linie, które spadły razem przez większość roku, zanim rozeszły się w maju 2026.
79
Article
Ustawa o Klarowności przeszła przez Komisję Bankową Senatu 15-9 z 2 głosami DemokratówUstawa dotycząca struktury rynku kryptowalut przeszła pierwszą poważną przeszkodę legislacyjną w czwartek, zyskując poparcie w Komisji Bankowej Senatu z bipartyzanym marginesem, którego przewidywał CEO Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, przed głosowaniem.
Kluczowe informacje
Ustawa o Klarowności przeszła 15-9 z Komisji Bankowej Senatu
Dwóch Demokratów głosowało za: senatorzy Gallego i Alsobrooks
Nagrody za stablecoiny: dozwolona aktywność oparta na aktywności, zakaz trzymania pasywnego
SEC i CFTC otrzymują wyraźnie zdefiniowane granice jurysdykcyjne
Następny przystanek: pełna sala senacka, gdzie do zamknięcia potrzeba 60 głosów
Ustawa o Klarowności przeszła przez Komisję Bankową Senatu 15-9 z 2 głosami Demokratów
Ustawa dotycząca struktury rynku kryptowalut przeszła pierwszą poważną przeszkodę legislacyjną w czwartek, zyskując poparcie w Komisji Bankowej Senatu z bipartyzanym marginesem, którego przewidywał CEO Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, przed głosowaniem.
Kluczowe informacje
Ustawa o Klarowności przeszła 15-9 z Komisji Bankowej Senatu
Dwóch Demokratów głosowało za: senatorzy Gallego i Alsobrooks
Nagrody za stablecoiny: dozwolona aktywność oparta na aktywności, zakaz trzymania pasywnego
SEC i CFTC otrzymują wyraźnie zdefiniowane granice jurysdykcyjne
Następny przystanek: pełna sala senacka, gdzie do zamknięcia potrzeba 60 głosów
Kluczowe informacje
Ustawa o Klarowności przeszła 15-9 z Komisji Bankowej Senatu
Dwóch Demokratów głosowało za: senatorzy Gallego i Alsobrooks
Nagrody za stablecoiny: dozwolona aktywność oparta na aktywności, zakaz trzymania pasywnego
SEC i CFTC otrzymują wyraźnie zdefiniowane granice jurysdykcyjne
Następny przystanek: pełna sala senacka, gdzie do zamknięcia potrzeba 60 głosów
134
Article
Zobacz tłumaczenie
ETH Realized Profits Hit a 3-Week High as RSI Flatlines in The DipFour data sources are describing the same Ethereum market simultaneously: February–March accumulators distributing, spot buyers absorbing, and leveraged shorts piling on top, with the result that hourly momentum has gone nearly to zero.
Key Takeaways
ETH at $2,257, below all three hourly SMAs, SMA200 at $2,311.RSI at 45.52, signal at 45.31: spread of 0.21 points, momentum flat.Network realized profits hit $74.58M: 3-week high during a 5.5% decline.Binance CVD fell from $4.03B to $1.9B: more than 50% drop since May 6.OI rising from $2.6B to $2.8B while CVD falls: leverage without buyers.
What the hourly chart shows about where momentum has gone
The ETH/USDT 1-hour chart shows Ethereum at $2,257 at the time of writing. Price sits below all three SMAs, with SMA50 closest overhead at $2,274, SMA100 at $2,302, and SMA200 at $2,311 forming a compressed resistance cluster above. All three are declining.
The RSI at 45.52 with a signal spread of 0.21 points is the tightest momentum reading on the current chart: it does not describe a market moving in either direction, it describes a market where three opposing forces, distributing accumulators, absorbing spot buyers, and rebuilding leveraged shorts, have neutralized each other to a standstill. A spread of 0.21 points leaves no meaningful gap between RSI and signal, giving the indicator no directional lean in either direction. That indecision is the chart's answer to the question of what comes next: it does not know yet, and neither does the market.
Why realized profits are rising while price falls
Santiment's network data shows Ethereum registered $74.58M in realized profits, the highest single reading in three weeks, during the same period that price dropped approximately 5.5% over three days. The apparent contradiction resolves when the cost basis of the sellers is considered.
A realized profit spike of $74.58M during a 5.5% price decline is not a contradiction: it is a precise description of who is selling, specifically holders who accumulated below $2,000 in February and March and are still in profit at $2,257, meaning the current sell-off is being driven by people who are right, not people who are panicking. Ethereum traded below $2,000 through much of February and March during a period of macro uncertainty and war fears. Wallets that accumulated during those months have a cost basis low enough that $2,257 still represents a meaningful gain. Those holders are distributing into the dip, not because they fear further decline, but because the price is still high enough relative to their entry to justify taking profit.
Santiment's reading of the compression near $2,241 on the 4-hour chart confirms the distribution is active. Their recommendation is direct: lean cautious, wait for deeper realized losses to appear as the bottoming signal, and avoid aggressive positioning until the distribution phase shows clear signs of ending.
What Binance derivatives show about who is building positions
Binance cumulative net taker volume peaked at approximately $4.03 billion on May 6 and has since fallen to approximately $1.9 billion, a decline of more than 50% in eight days, according to Amr Taha's CryptoQuant analysis. Simultaneously, Binance open interest has risen from approximately $2.6 billion on May 11 to approximately $2.8 billion by May 14.
When CVD falls 50% while open interest rises, the leverage being added to the market is not coming from aggressive buyers: it is coming from traders positioning for the distribution to continue, and the liquidation clusters above price that Amr Taha identifies are the mechanism that would reverse the setup sharply if the distribution ends before the shorts expect it to. The heatmap shows liquidity clusters above price are larger than those below, meaning a move upward would trigger a cascade of short liquidations that could accelerate price beyond what the underlying spot buying would justify.
PelinayPA's exchange netflow analysis adds the fourth layer: consecutive sharp positive spikes in ETH flowing to Binance are the supply-side confirmation of the distribution. The detail PelinayPA isolates is that price has not collapsed sharply despite the inflows, which suggests spot buyers are present and absorbing a portion of the supply. Without that absorption, the realized profit distribution plus the leveraged shorts would have pushed price lower more aggressively than the 5.5% decline observed.
What the four signals describe together
The distribution-and-absorption standoff is the structure all four sources are describing simultaneously. Santiment identifies the sellers and their motivation. Amr Taha identifies the leveraged positioning being built on top of that selling. PelinayPA identifies the spot buyers partially absorbing the supply. The hourly chart summarizes all three in a single RSI reading of 45.52 with a 0.21 spread: the forces are balanced, and the balance is the risk.
A sustained hourly close above the SMA50 at $2,274, with RSI crossing above 50 and holding, combined with Santiment's network realized profit metric shifting toward deeper realized losses on consecutive days, would confirm the bullish case: deeper losses signal that profitable cost-basis sellers have exhausted their supply and the remaining sellers are capitulating rather than distributing, which historically precedes a genuine price floor.
A sustained hourly close below $2,241, the compression level Santiment identifies as the distribution zone, with OI continuing to expand and CVD falling below $1.5B, would indicate the leveraged shorts and distributing sellers are overwhelming the spot buyers and the next leg lower is beginning rather than a consolidation before recovery.
#ETH
ETH Realized Profits Hit a 3-Week High as RSI Flatlines in The Dip
Four data sources are describing the same Ethereum market simultaneously: February–March accumulators distributing, spot buyers absorbing, and leveraged shorts piling on top, with the result that hourly momentum has gone nearly to zero.
Key Takeaways
ETH at $2,257, below all three hourly SMAs, SMA200 at $2,311.RSI at 45.52, signal at 45.31: spread of 0.21 points, momentum flat.Network realized profits hit $74.58M: 3-week high during a 5.5% decline.Binance CVD fell from $4.03B to $1.9B: more than 50% drop since May 6.OI rising from $2.6B to $2.8B while CVD falls: leverage without buyers.
What the hourly chart shows about where momentum has gone
The ETH/USDT 1-hour chart shows Ethereum at $2,257 at the time of writing. Price sits below all three SMAs, with SMA50 closest overhead at $2,274, SMA100 at $2,302, and SMA200 at $2,311 forming a compressed resistance cluster above. All three are declining.
The RSI at 45.52 with a signal spread of 0.21 points is the tightest momentum reading on the current chart: it does not describe a market moving in either direction, it describes a market where three opposing forces, distributing accumulators, absorbing spot buyers, and rebuilding leveraged shorts, have neutralized each other to a standstill. A spread of 0.21 points leaves no meaningful gap between RSI and signal, giving the indicator no directional lean in either direction. That indecision is the chart's answer to the question of what comes next: it does not know yet, and neither does the market.
Why realized profits are rising while price falls
Santiment's network data shows Ethereum registered $74.58M in realized profits, the highest single reading in three weeks, during the same period that price dropped approximately 5.5% over three days. The apparent contradiction resolves when the cost basis of the sellers is considered.
A realized profit spike of $74.58M during a 5.5% price decline is not a contradiction: it is a precise description of who is selling, specifically holders who accumulated below $2,000 in February and March and are still in profit at $2,257, meaning the current sell-off is being driven by people who are right, not people who are panicking. Ethereum traded below $2,000 through much of February and March during a period of macro uncertainty and war fears. Wallets that accumulated during those months have a cost basis low enough that $2,257 still represents a meaningful gain. Those holders are distributing into the dip, not because they fear further decline, but because the price is still high enough relative to their entry to justify taking profit.
Santiment's reading of the compression near $2,241 on the 4-hour chart confirms the distribution is active. Their recommendation is direct: lean cautious, wait for deeper realized losses to appear as the bottoming signal, and avoid aggressive positioning until the distribution phase shows clear signs of ending.
What Binance derivatives show about who is building positions
Binance cumulative net taker volume peaked at approximately $4.03 billion on May 6 and has since fallen to approximately $1.9 billion, a decline of more than 50% in eight days, according to Amr Taha's CryptoQuant analysis. Simultaneously, Binance open interest has risen from approximately $2.6 billion on May 11 to approximately $2.8 billion by May 14.
When CVD falls 50% while open interest rises, the leverage being added to the market is not coming from aggressive buyers: it is coming from traders positioning for the distribution to continue, and the liquidation clusters above price that Amr Taha identifies are the mechanism that would reverse the setup sharply if the distribution ends before the shorts expect it to. The heatmap shows liquidity clusters above price are larger than those below, meaning a move upward would trigger a cascade of short liquidations that could accelerate price beyond what the underlying spot buying would justify.
PelinayPA's exchange netflow analysis adds the fourth layer: consecutive sharp positive spikes in ETH flowing to Binance are the supply-side confirmation of the distribution. The detail PelinayPA isolates is that price has not collapsed sharply despite the inflows, which suggests spot buyers are present and absorbing a portion of the supply. Without that absorption, the realized profit distribution plus the leveraged shorts would have pushed price lower more aggressively than the 5.5% decline observed.
What the four signals describe together
The distribution-and-absorption standoff is the structure all four sources are describing simultaneously. Santiment identifies the sellers and their motivation. Amr Taha identifies the leveraged positioning being built on top of that selling. PelinayPA identifies the spot buyers partially absorbing the supply. The hourly chart summarizes all three in a single RSI reading of 45.52 with a 0.21 spread: the forces are balanced, and the balance is the risk.
A sustained hourly close above the SMA50 at $2,274, with RSI crossing above 50 and holding, combined with Santiment's network realized profit metric shifting toward deeper realized losses on consecutive days, would confirm the bullish case: deeper losses signal that profitable cost-basis sellers have exhausted their supply and the remaining sellers are capitulating rather than distributing, which historically precedes a genuine price floor.
A sustained hourly close below $2,241, the compression level Santiment identifies as the distribution zone, with OI continuing to expand and CVD falling below $1.5B, would indicate the leveraged shorts and distributing sellers are overwhelming the spot buyers and the next leg lower is beginning rather than a consolidation before recovery.
#ETH
Key Takeaways
ETH at $2,257, below all three hourly SMAs, SMA200 at $2,311.RSI at 45.52, signal at 45.31: spread of 0.21 points, momentum flat.Network realized profits hit $74.58M: 3-week high during a 5.5% decline.Binance CVD fell from $4.03B to $1.9B: more than 50% drop since May 6.OI rising from $2.6B to $2.8B while CVD falls: leverage without buyers.
What the hourly chart shows about where momentum has gone
The ETH/USDT 1-hour chart shows Ethereum at $2,257 at the time of writing. Price sits below all three SMAs, with SMA50 closest overhead at $2,274, SMA100 at $2,302, and SMA200 at $2,311 forming a compressed resistance cluster above. All three are declining.
The RSI at 45.52 with a signal spread of 0.21 points is the tightest momentum reading on the current chart: it does not describe a market moving in either direction, it describes a market where three opposing forces, distributing accumulators, absorbing spot buyers, and rebuilding leveraged shorts, have neutralized each other to a standstill. A spread of 0.21 points leaves no meaningful gap between RSI and signal, giving the indicator no directional lean in either direction. That indecision is the chart's answer to the question of what comes next: it does not know yet, and neither does the market.
Why realized profits are rising while price falls
Santiment's network data shows Ethereum registered $74.58M in realized profits, the highest single reading in three weeks, during the same period that price dropped approximately 5.5% over three days. The apparent contradiction resolves when the cost basis of the sellers is considered.
A realized profit spike of $74.58M during a 5.5% price decline is not a contradiction: it is a precise description of who is selling, specifically holders who accumulated below $2,000 in February and March and are still in profit at $2,257, meaning the current sell-off is being driven by people who are right, not people who are panicking. Ethereum traded below $2,000 through much of February and March during a period of macro uncertainty and war fears. Wallets that accumulated during those months have a cost basis low enough that $2,257 still represents a meaningful gain. Those holders are distributing into the dip, not because they fear further decline, but because the price is still high enough relative to their entry to justify taking profit.
Santiment's reading of the compression near $2,241 on the 4-hour chart confirms the distribution is active. Their recommendation is direct: lean cautious, wait for deeper realized losses to appear as the bottoming signal, and avoid aggressive positioning until the distribution phase shows clear signs of ending.
What Binance derivatives show about who is building positions
Binance cumulative net taker volume peaked at approximately $4.03 billion on May 6 and has since fallen to approximately $1.9 billion, a decline of more than 50% in eight days, according to Amr Taha's CryptoQuant analysis. Simultaneously, Binance open interest has risen from approximately $2.6 billion on May 11 to approximately $2.8 billion by May 14.
When CVD falls 50% while open interest rises, the leverage being added to the market is not coming from aggressive buyers: it is coming from traders positioning for the distribution to continue, and the liquidation clusters above price that Amr Taha identifies are the mechanism that would reverse the setup sharply if the distribution ends before the shorts expect it to. The heatmap shows liquidity clusters above price are larger than those below, meaning a move upward would trigger a cascade of short liquidations that could accelerate price beyond what the underlying spot buying would justify.
PelinayPA's exchange netflow analysis adds the fourth layer: consecutive sharp positive spikes in ETH flowing to Binance are the supply-side confirmation of the distribution. The detail PelinayPA isolates is that price has not collapsed sharply despite the inflows, which suggests spot buyers are present and absorbing a portion of the supply. Without that absorption, the realized profit distribution plus the leveraged shorts would have pushed price lower more aggressively than the 5.5% decline observed.
What the four signals describe together
The distribution-and-absorption standoff is the structure all four sources are describing simultaneously. Santiment identifies the sellers and their motivation. Amr Taha identifies the leveraged positioning being built on top of that selling. PelinayPA identifies the spot buyers partially absorbing the supply. The hourly chart summarizes all three in a single RSI reading of 45.52 with a 0.21 spread: the forces are balanced, and the balance is the risk.
A sustained hourly close above the SMA50 at $2,274, with RSI crossing above 50 and holding, combined with Santiment's network realized profit metric shifting toward deeper realized losses on consecutive days, would confirm the bullish case: deeper losses signal that profitable cost-basis sellers have exhausted their supply and the remaining sellers are capitulating rather than distributing, which historically precedes a genuine price floor.
A sustained hourly close below $2,241, the compression level Santiment identifies as the distribution zone, with OI continuing to expand and CVD falling below $1.5B, would indicate the leveraged shorts and distributing sellers are overwhelming the spot buyers and the next leg lower is beginning rather than a consolidation before recovery.
#ETH
40
Article
Zobacz tłumaczenie
Bitcoin's Bull and Bear Cases Meet at The Same Level: Here is What to WatchTwo competing frameworks are reading the same Bitcoin price action and reaching opposite conclusions, but they are pointing at the same level to settle the argument.
Key Takeaways
BTC at $79,246 on the monthly chart, up 3.80% with 13 days remaining.Monthly SMA50 at $58,969: key support for bulls, H&S target for bears.RSI at 50.09, bounced from 43, signal at 58.83.H&S confirmed, target $59,000, neckline retest active.Long-term uptrend channel and monthly SMA50 both intact at time of writing.
What the monthly chart shows
The BTC/USDT monthly chart shows Bitcoin at $79,246, up 3.80% on the month with the candle open at $76,346 and a high of $82,850 reached earlier in May. The monthly low sits at $76,320, meaning the candle has held above it through 17 days of the month.
Two structural elements define the monthly chart. The long-term ascending channel, drawn from the 2019 lows, continues to contain price action: the lower boundary sits at approximately $60,000–$65,000 at the current point in 2026, and price remains above it. The monthly SMA50 at $58,969 sits below the channel boundary, rising steadily and representing the second line of structural support if the channel boundary were to be tested.
Price is inside the channel, above the SMA50, and the monthly candle is recovering from its low. The long-term uptrend structure has not produced a confirmed breakdown at this timeframe, and the major support zones continue holding despite the volatility of recent months.
The bullish reading and what it requires
The bullish case rests on three technical observations arriving simultaneously. Price held above a historically significant support zone during the correction. The monthly RSI bounced from approximately 43, a level that in prior Bitcoin cycles has marked the transition between the main correction phase and the early recovery. And the long-term uptrend channel boundary held without a sustained close below it.
A monthly RSI at 50, bouncing from 43, is not a recovery signal on its own: it is a reading at the exact midpoint between the levels that have historically marked Bitcoin bull markets above 60 and bear markets below 40, and the direction it resolves from here will tell the monthly chart's story for the rest of 2026. The RSI signal line at 58.83 sits 8.74 points above the RSI reading, indicating the monthly momentum has not yet confirmed the recovery: the RSI needs to cross back above its signal to make that argument.
The bullish case identifies $79,500 as a near-term threshold where shorter-term momentum would begin confirming what the monthly structure is already suggesting. That conversion has not yet occurred at time of writing, with Bitcoin at $79,246, and it functions as the hourly-timeframe condition that would support the monthly reading rather than define it.
The bearish reading and what it claims
Crypto analyst Merlijn The Trader presents the opposite interpretation of the same price action. His weekly chart shows a Head and Shoulders pattern with the head at approximately $109,000, a neckline zone in the $77,000–$83,000 area, a confirmed breakout below the neckline, and a current retest of that neckline from below. He states a target of $59,000 in his post, though his chart projects a measured target of $54,758, a discrepancy he does not elaborate on.
The current price of $79,246 sits inside the neckline zone of Merlijn's Head and Shoulders pattern, which means the market is at the precise point where a confirmed breakdown and a pattern invalidation are separated by a weekly close rather than a distant price target. A weekly close back above the neckline zone invalidates the pattern. A failure to close above it and a return lower confirms the retest has failed and the breakdown is active.
Merlijn builds a macro case alongside the technical one: a seasonal sell in May pattern, Bitcoin's historical weakness during Fed Chair changes, Livermore phase 7, Warren Buffett holding $400 billion in cash, and Michael Burry holding a $1 billion short position. These are contextual factors rather than technical signals, and their weight depends on whether the H&S pattern provides the mechanism for the move he is describing.
He also states that "14 years of support" has been broken. The monthly chart available does not show a confirmed break of the long-term ascending channel that has defined Bitcoin's structure since 2019, and Merlijn does not specify which trendline or support structure he is referencing. The claim cannot be verified from the monthly chart, which means it functions as an assertion within his broader bearish case rather than a technically confirmable statement. It does not invalidate the H&S analysis, which stands independently on the weekly chart, but it should be weighted accordingly.
Why the two cases converge at the same number
The analytical observation that no single source makes: Merlijn's $59,000 target and the monthly SMA50 at $58,969 are separated by $31, which means the bearish case and the key support the bullish case depends on are pointing at the same number, and whichever framework proves correct, the monthly SMA50 is where the debate ends.
The channel lower boundary at approximately $60,000–$65,000 sits between $1,000 and $6,000 above the SMA50 at $58,969, depending on where within that range the boundary is measured at the current point in 2026. A move to $59,000 would breach both the lower channel boundary and the SMA50 in the same price range, meaning the bearish target does not merely test one support: it requires breaking through the channel first and then the SMA50 within a narrow price band. That sequential breach is what the bullish case argues against and what the bearish case requires to confirm.
What the next monthly close will determine
A monthly close above $83,000, clearing both the May high of $82,850 and the top of the neckline zone Merlijn identifies, would invalidate the Head and Shoulders pattern and confirm the bullish reading that the long-term channel and SMA50 support have held the correction.
A monthly close below $76,320, breaching the current monthly low and breaking back below the neckline zone, would confirm Merlijn's retest has failed and the H&S pattern is active, opening the measured target range toward $54,758–$59,000 and placing the channel lower boundary and the monthly SMA50 at $58,969 as the sequential tests that follow.
#bitcoin
Bitcoin's Bull and Bear Cases Meet at The Same Level: Here is What to Watch
Two competing frameworks are reading the same Bitcoin price action and reaching opposite conclusions, but they are pointing at the same level to settle the argument.
Key Takeaways
BTC at $79,246 on the monthly chart, up 3.80% with 13 days remaining.Monthly SMA50 at $58,969: key support for bulls, H&S target for bears.RSI at 50.09, bounced from 43, signal at 58.83.H&S confirmed, target $59,000, neckline retest active.Long-term uptrend channel and monthly SMA50 both intact at time of writing.
What the monthly chart shows
The BTC/USDT monthly chart shows Bitcoin at $79,246, up 3.80% on the month with the candle open at $76,346 and a high of $82,850 reached earlier in May. The monthly low sits at $76,320, meaning the candle has held above it through 17 days of the month.
Two structural elements define the monthly chart. The long-term ascending channel, drawn from the 2019 lows, continues to contain price action: the lower boundary sits at approximately $60,000–$65,000 at the current point in 2026, and price remains above it. The monthly SMA50 at $58,969 sits below the channel boundary, rising steadily and representing the second line of structural support if the channel boundary were to be tested.
Price is inside the channel, above the SMA50, and the monthly candle is recovering from its low. The long-term uptrend structure has not produced a confirmed breakdown at this timeframe, and the major support zones continue holding despite the volatility of recent months.
The bullish reading and what it requires
The bullish case rests on three technical observations arriving simultaneously. Price held above a historically significant support zone during the correction. The monthly RSI bounced from approximately 43, a level that in prior Bitcoin cycles has marked the transition between the main correction phase and the early recovery. And the long-term uptrend channel boundary held without a sustained close below it.
A monthly RSI at 50, bouncing from 43, is not a recovery signal on its own: it is a reading at the exact midpoint between the levels that have historically marked Bitcoin bull markets above 60 and bear markets below 40, and the direction it resolves from here will tell the monthly chart's story for the rest of 2026. The RSI signal line at 58.83 sits 8.74 points above the RSI reading, indicating the monthly momentum has not yet confirmed the recovery: the RSI needs to cross back above its signal to make that argument.
The bullish case identifies $79,500 as a near-term threshold where shorter-term momentum would begin confirming what the monthly structure is already suggesting. That conversion has not yet occurred at time of writing, with Bitcoin at $79,246, and it functions as the hourly-timeframe condition that would support the monthly reading rather than define it.
The bearish reading and what it claims
Crypto analyst Merlijn The Trader presents the opposite interpretation of the same price action. His weekly chart shows a Head and Shoulders pattern with the head at approximately $109,000, a neckline zone in the $77,000–$83,000 area, a confirmed breakout below the neckline, and a current retest of that neckline from below. He states a target of $59,000 in his post, though his chart projects a measured target of $54,758, a discrepancy he does not elaborate on.
The current price of $79,246 sits inside the neckline zone of Merlijn's Head and Shoulders pattern, which means the market is at the precise point where a confirmed breakdown and a pattern invalidation are separated by a weekly close rather than a distant price target. A weekly close back above the neckline zone invalidates the pattern. A failure to close above it and a return lower confirms the retest has failed and the breakdown is active.
Merlijn builds a macro case alongside the technical one: a seasonal sell in May pattern, Bitcoin's historical weakness during Fed Chair changes, Livermore phase 7, Warren Buffett holding $400 billion in cash, and Michael Burry holding a $1 billion short position. These are contextual factors rather than technical signals, and their weight depends on whether the H&S pattern provides the mechanism for the move he is describing.
He also states that "14 years of support" has been broken. The monthly chart available does not show a confirmed break of the long-term ascending channel that has defined Bitcoin's structure since 2019, and Merlijn does not specify which trendline or support structure he is referencing. The claim cannot be verified from the monthly chart, which means it functions as an assertion within his broader bearish case rather than a technically confirmable statement. It does not invalidate the H&S analysis, which stands independently on the weekly chart, but it should be weighted accordingly.
Why the two cases converge at the same number
The analytical observation that no single source makes: Merlijn's $59,000 target and the monthly SMA50 at $58,969 are separated by $31, which means the bearish case and the key support the bullish case depends on are pointing at the same number, and whichever framework proves correct, the monthly SMA50 is where the debate ends.
The channel lower boundary at approximately $60,000–$65,000 sits between $1,000 and $6,000 above the SMA50 at $58,969, depending on where within that range the boundary is measured at the current point in 2026. A move to $59,000 would breach both the lower channel boundary and the SMA50 in the same price range, meaning the bearish target does not merely test one support: it requires breaking through the channel first and then the SMA50 within a narrow price band. That sequential breach is what the bullish case argues against and what the bearish case requires to confirm.
What the next monthly close will determine
A monthly close above $83,000, clearing both the May high of $82,850 and the top of the neckline zone Merlijn identifies, would invalidate the Head and Shoulders pattern and confirm the bullish reading that the long-term channel and SMA50 support have held the correction.
A monthly close below $76,320, breaching the current monthly low and breaking back below the neckline zone, would confirm Merlijn's retest has failed and the H&S pattern is active, opening the measured target range toward $54,758–$59,000 and placing the channel lower boundary and the monthly SMA50 at $58,969 as the sequential tests that follow.
#bitcoin
Key Takeaways
BTC at $79,246 on the monthly chart, up 3.80% with 13 days remaining.Monthly SMA50 at $58,969: key support for bulls, H&S target for bears.RSI at 50.09, bounced from 43, signal at 58.83.H&S confirmed, target $59,000, neckline retest active.Long-term uptrend channel and monthly SMA50 both intact at time of writing.
What the monthly chart shows
The BTC/USDT monthly chart shows Bitcoin at $79,246, up 3.80% on the month with the candle open at $76,346 and a high of $82,850 reached earlier in May. The monthly low sits at $76,320, meaning the candle has held above it through 17 days of the month.
Two structural elements define the monthly chart. The long-term ascending channel, drawn from the 2019 lows, continues to contain price action: the lower boundary sits at approximately $60,000–$65,000 at the current point in 2026, and price remains above it. The monthly SMA50 at $58,969 sits below the channel boundary, rising steadily and representing the second line of structural support if the channel boundary were to be tested.
Price is inside the channel, above the SMA50, and the monthly candle is recovering from its low. The long-term uptrend structure has not produced a confirmed breakdown at this timeframe, and the major support zones continue holding despite the volatility of recent months.
The bullish reading and what it requires
The bullish case rests on three technical observations arriving simultaneously. Price held above a historically significant support zone during the correction. The monthly RSI bounced from approximately 43, a level that in prior Bitcoin cycles has marked the transition between the main correction phase and the early recovery. And the long-term uptrend channel boundary held without a sustained close below it.
A monthly RSI at 50, bouncing from 43, is not a recovery signal on its own: it is a reading at the exact midpoint between the levels that have historically marked Bitcoin bull markets above 60 and bear markets below 40, and the direction it resolves from here will tell the monthly chart's story for the rest of 2026. The RSI signal line at 58.83 sits 8.74 points above the RSI reading, indicating the monthly momentum has not yet confirmed the recovery: the RSI needs to cross back above its signal to make that argument.
The bullish case identifies $79,500 as a near-term threshold where shorter-term momentum would begin confirming what the monthly structure is already suggesting. That conversion has not yet occurred at time of writing, with Bitcoin at $79,246, and it functions as the hourly-timeframe condition that would support the monthly reading rather than define it.
The bearish reading and what it claims
Crypto analyst Merlijn The Trader presents the opposite interpretation of the same price action. His weekly chart shows a Head and Shoulders pattern with the head at approximately $109,000, a neckline zone in the $77,000–$83,000 area, a confirmed breakout below the neckline, and a current retest of that neckline from below. He states a target of $59,000 in his post, though his chart projects a measured target of $54,758, a discrepancy he does not elaborate on.
The current price of $79,246 sits inside the neckline zone of Merlijn's Head and Shoulders pattern, which means the market is at the precise point where a confirmed breakdown and a pattern invalidation are separated by a weekly close rather than a distant price target. A weekly close back above the neckline zone invalidates the pattern. A failure to close above it and a return lower confirms the retest has failed and the breakdown is active.
Merlijn builds a macro case alongside the technical one: a seasonal sell in May pattern, Bitcoin's historical weakness during Fed Chair changes, Livermore phase 7, Warren Buffett holding $400 billion in cash, and Michael Burry holding a $1 billion short position. These are contextual factors rather than technical signals, and their weight depends on whether the H&S pattern provides the mechanism for the move he is describing.
He also states that "14 years of support" has been broken. The monthly chart available does not show a confirmed break of the long-term ascending channel that has defined Bitcoin's structure since 2019, and Merlijn does not specify which trendline or support structure he is referencing. The claim cannot be verified from the monthly chart, which means it functions as an assertion within his broader bearish case rather than a technically confirmable statement. It does not invalidate the H&S analysis, which stands independently on the weekly chart, but it should be weighted accordingly.
Why the two cases converge at the same number
The analytical observation that no single source makes: Merlijn's $59,000 target and the monthly SMA50 at $58,969 are separated by $31, which means the bearish case and the key support the bullish case depends on are pointing at the same number, and whichever framework proves correct, the monthly SMA50 is where the debate ends.
The channel lower boundary at approximately $60,000–$65,000 sits between $1,000 and $6,000 above the SMA50 at $58,969, depending on where within that range the boundary is measured at the current point in 2026. A move to $59,000 would breach both the lower channel boundary and the SMA50 in the same price range, meaning the bearish target does not merely test one support: it requires breaking through the channel first and then the SMA50 within a narrow price band. That sequential breach is what the bullish case argues against and what the bearish case requires to confirm.
What the next monthly close will determine
A monthly close above $83,000, clearing both the May high of $82,850 and the top of the neckline zone Merlijn identifies, would invalidate the Head and Shoulders pattern and confirm the bullish reading that the long-term channel and SMA50 support have held the correction.
A monthly close below $76,320, breaching the current monthly low and breaking back below the neckline zone, would confirm Merlijn's retest has failed and the H&S pattern is active, opening the measured target range toward $54,758–$59,000 and placing the channel lower boundary and the monthly SMA50 at $58,969 as the sequential tests that follow.
#bitcoin
58
Article
Akumulacja wielorybów Cardano na najwyższym poziomie, gdy SuperTrend zmienia się w kupnoTrzy punkty danych zbiegną się w tym tygodniu w Cardano, a najważniejszy z nich to nie sygnał kupna.
Kluczowe wnioski
Ponad 1M portfeli ADA posiada 25.09B tokenów: najwyższy w historii, 67.47% podaży.
Koncentracja podaży najwyższa od lipca 2020 roku.
SuperTrend odwrócił się na kupno na dziennym wykresie.
Cel główny $0.33, cel pomocniczy $0.42, poziom unieważnienia $0.25.
SMA200 na poziomie $0.3441 znajduje się powyżej głównego celu $0.33 i jest kluczowym poziomem do przebicia.
Co mierzy dane o akumulacji
Dane on-chain od Santiment pokazują, że portfele trzymające co najmniej 1 milion ADA teraz łącznie posiadają 25.09 miliarda tokenów, co jest najwyższym wynikiem w historii. Ta liczba stanowi 67.47% aktualnej cyrkulującej podaży ADA, najwyższa koncentracja w tej kategorii portfeli od lipca 2020 roku. Trend akumulacji buduje się od grudnia 2023 roku, co oznacza, że dużym posiadaczom udało się systematycznie zwiększać swoje pozycje w okresie, gdy kapitalizacja rynkowa ADA spadła o 71%.
Akumulacja wielorybów Cardano na najwyższym poziomie, gdy SuperTrend zmienia się w kupno
Trzy punkty danych zbiegną się w tym tygodniu w Cardano, a najważniejszy z nich to nie sygnał kupna.
Kluczowe wnioski
Ponad 1M portfeli ADA posiada 25.09B tokenów: najwyższy w historii, 67.47% podaży.
Koncentracja podaży najwyższa od lipca 2020 roku.
SuperTrend odwrócił się na kupno na dziennym wykresie.
Cel główny $0.33, cel pomocniczy $0.42, poziom unieważnienia $0.25.
SMA200 na poziomie $0.3441 znajduje się powyżej głównego celu $0.33 i jest kluczowym poziomem do przebicia.
Co mierzy dane o akumulacji
Dane on-chain od Santiment pokazują, że portfele trzymające co najmniej 1 milion ADA teraz łącznie posiadają 25.09 miliarda tokenów, co jest najwyższym wynikiem w historii. Ta liczba stanowi 67.47% aktualnej cyrkulującej podaży ADA, najwyższa koncentracja w tej kategorii portfeli od lipca 2020 roku. Trend akumulacji buduje się od grudnia 2023 roku, co oznacza, że dużym posiadaczom udało się systematycznie zwiększać swoje pozycje w okresie, gdy kapitalizacja rynkowa ADA spadła o 71%.
Kluczowe wnioski
Ponad 1M portfeli ADA posiada 25.09B tokenów: najwyższy w historii, 67.47% podaży.
Koncentracja podaży najwyższa od lipca 2020 roku.
SuperTrend odwrócił się na kupno na dziennym wykresie.
Cel główny $0.33, cel pomocniczy $0.42, poziom unieważnienia $0.25.
SMA200 na poziomie $0.3441 znajduje się powyżej głównego celu $0.33 i jest kluczowym poziomem do przebicia.
Co mierzy dane o akumulacji
Dane on-chain od Santiment pokazują, że portfele trzymające co najmniej 1 milion ADA teraz łącznie posiadają 25.09 miliarda tokenów, co jest najwyższym wynikiem w historii. Ta liczba stanowi 67.47% aktualnej cyrkulującej podaży ADA, najwyższa koncentracja w tej kategorii portfeli od lipca 2020 roku. Trend akumulacji buduje się od grudnia 2023 roku, co oznacza, że dużym posiadaczom udało się systematycznie zwiększać swoje pozycje w okresie, gdy kapitalizacja rynkowa ADA spadła o 71%.
109
Article
Otwarte Zainteresowanie XRP Powyżej Normy, Gdy Cena Utrzymuje Się $0.003 Od SMA200Rynek instrumentów pochodnych XRP gromadzi ryzyko w tempie powyżej niedawnej podstawy, a cena spotowa znajduje się wystarczająco blisko SMA200, że podwyższone otwarte zainteresowanie staje się wyzwalaczem kierunkowym, a nie sygnałem kierunkowym.
Kluczowe Wnioski
OI na poziomie $475.4M, 8% powyżej 30-dniowej średniej wynoszącej $440.7M
Z-Score OI na poziomie 1.65: powyżej progu 1.0, co sygnalizuje podwyższone dźwignie
XRP po $1.4330, SMA200 na poziomie $1.4303, margines wynosi $0.0027
SMA100 powyżej SMA50: konfiguracja niedźwiedziej krzyżówki na wykresie godzinowym
RSI na poziomie 44.87, sygnał na 49.52, spread 4.65 punktów
Otwarte Zainteresowanie XRP Powyżej Normy, Gdy Cena Utrzymuje Się $0.003 Od SMA200
Rynek instrumentów pochodnych XRP gromadzi ryzyko w tempie powyżej niedawnej podstawy, a cena spotowa znajduje się wystarczająco blisko SMA200, że podwyższone otwarte zainteresowanie staje się wyzwalaczem kierunkowym, a nie sygnałem kierunkowym.
Kluczowe Wnioski
OI na poziomie $475.4M, 8% powyżej 30-dniowej średniej wynoszącej $440.7M
Z-Score OI na poziomie 1.65: powyżej progu 1.0, co sygnalizuje podwyższone dźwignie
XRP po $1.4330, SMA200 na poziomie $1.4303, margines wynosi $0.0027
SMA100 powyżej SMA50: konfiguracja niedźwiedziej krzyżówki na wykresie godzinowym
RSI na poziomie 44.87, sygnał na 49.52, spread 4.65 punktów
Kluczowe Wnioski
OI na poziomie $475.4M, 8% powyżej 30-dniowej średniej wynoszącej $440.7M
Z-Score OI na poziomie 1.65: powyżej progu 1.0, co sygnalizuje podwyższone dźwignie
XRP po $1.4330, SMA200 na poziomie $1.4303, margines wynosi $0.0027
SMA100 powyżej SMA50: konfiguracja niedźwiedziej krzyżówki na wykresie godzinowym
RSI na poziomie 44.87, sygnał na 49.52, spread 4.65 punktów
1
170
Zaloguj się, aby odkryć więcej treści
Dołącz do globalnej społeczności użytkowników kryptowalut na Binance Square
⚡️ Uzyskaj najnowsze i przydatne informacje o kryptowalutach.
💬 Dołącz do największej na świecie giełdy kryptowalut.
👍 Odkryj prawdziwe spostrzeżenia od zweryfikowanych twórców.
E-mail / Numer telefonu
Popularne tematy
SpaceXEyes2TIPO
214,203 wyświetleń
2,620 dyskutuje
Ripple: niedźwiedzie celują w $1.00, podczas gdy opór trójkąta ogranicza odbicie🔥🔥🔥
Ali Al-Shami
·3 polubień
·283 wyświetleń
TrumpIranThreatBTCTo76K
43,213 wyświetleń
570 dyskutuje
GoldmanSachsExitsXRPSolanaETFs
29,822 wyświetleń
380 dyskutuje