Binance Square

ANDREW COLLINS

image
Verificēts autors
Gentle with feelings. Dangerous with potential...
Atvērts tirdzniecības darījums
ASTER turētājs
ASTER turētājs
Tirgo bieži
1.5 gadi
815 Seko
30.4K+ Sekotāji
14.9K+ Patika
1.8K+ Kopīgots
Publikācijas
Portfelis
·
--
Skatīt tulkojumu
Most AI Projects Chase Power Mira Network Chases TrustWhen I first started paying attention to Mira Network, it was not because of hype or marketing. It was because the project focuses on a problem that many people in the AI space quietly acknowledge but rarely prioritize. Artificial intelligence is becoming more powerful every month. New models promise stronger reasoning, faster responses, and better performance on benchmarks. The entire industry seems to be racing toward smarter machines. But while everyone talks about intelligence, I keep thinking about something more fundamental. Can we actually trust the answers these systems produce? That question is what made Mira Network stand out to me. Artificial intelligence today is incredibly capable. It can generate research summaries, write long articles, explain complicated technical ideas, and even help developers build software. The speed at which these systems operate is remarkable. But behind that impressive capability there is a weakness that many users eventually notice. AI does not truly know whether its answers are correct. It predicts patterns based on massive datasets and generates responses that sound logical and confident. Sometimes those responses are accurate. Other times they contain subtle mistakes, outdated information, or details that never existed at all. The industry often describes this problem as hallucination. The reason hallucinations matter so much is because AI is no longer just a creative tool. It is slowly becoming infrastructure for decision making. Businesses use AI to analyze data, researchers use it to summarize findings, and financial platforms experiment with AI driven insights. In these environments even small errors can create serious consequences. Imagine an automated trading system making decisions based on a statistic that an AI model accidentally invented. Imagine a research assistant summarizing a study but misunderstanding its conclusions. These examples highlight a deeper issue. Artificial intelligence can generate knowledge extremely quickly, but it does not always verify that knowledge. This is where Mira Network introduces a very different perspective on the future of AI. Instead of focusing on building another large language model, the project is building a decentralized verification layer that evaluates AI generated information. When I first understood this concept it immediately made sense. Rather than trusting a single AI system to determine the truth, Mira Network treats every AI output as something that should be examined before people rely on it. The verification process begins when an AI model generates a response. Instead of accepting that response as a complete answer, the Mira Network system analyzes the text and breaks it into smaller claims. Each claim represents a specific piece of information that can be evaluated independently. These claims are then distributed across a network of verification nodes. Each node examines the information using its own models, datasets, or analytical tools. Because many participants review the same claims, the system avoids relying on the judgment of a single model. After validators complete their analysis, the network compares the results and reaches consensus about whether the information is accurate. If enough validators confirm the claim, it becomes verified knowledge. The verification record can then be secured using cryptographic proof which makes the process transparent and resistant to manipulation. What I find compelling about this approach is that it turns AI outputs into something more reliable. Instead of trusting a prediction, the system encourages collective verification. Another important dimension of Mira Network is its decentralized structure. Today many powerful AI systems are controlled by a small number of technology companies that manage the models and the data behind them. While this has accelerated innovation, it also means that trust is concentrated in the hands of a few organizations. Mira Network distributes verification across a decentralized network where multiple participants evaluate information. This approach encourages transparency and allows different perspectives to contribute to determining accuracy. The ecosystem is supported by the MIRA token which plays a key role in coordinating the network. Validators who contribute computing resources and analytical work can earn rewards through the token system. By verifying claims they help strengthen the reliability of the network while receiving incentives for their participation. Validators may also stake MIRA tokens when participating in verification tasks which creates accountability. If a validator repeatedly submits incorrect evaluations their stake and reputation may be affected. This mechanism helps align economic incentives with honest behavior. From my perspective the MIRA token transforms verification into a collaborative economic system. Instead of relying on centralized institutions to check information, the network encourages independent participants to contribute because there is value in maintaining accurate data. When incentives reward reliability the ecosystem becomes more sustainable and resilient. Thinking about the potential applications makes this idea even more interesting. Financial platforms could rely on verified AI insights before acting on market signals. Research tools could analyze large volumes of data while validating key claims before presenting conclusions. Educational platforms could deliver explanations that have already been checked for accuracy. Even autonomous AI agents could benefit from accessing verified information when making decisions in digital environments. The importance of this type of infrastructure will likely increase as artificial intelligence becomes more integrated into everyday systems. Businesses already depend on AI driven analysis to process enormous datasets. Governments explore AI tools for policy evaluation. Researchers rely on AI to accelerate scientific discovery. As these systems grow more influential, the reliability of their information will matter just as much as their computational power. When I think about the evolution of technology, the systems that shape the future are often the ones that create trust. The internet became reliable because communication protocols ensured data could move safely between computers. Blockchain introduced decentralized trust for financial transactions. Artificial intelligence may require a similar layer where information can be verified before it spreads across networks. Mira Network represents an attempt to build that layer. By combining decentralized verification, AI analysis, and economic incentives through the MIRA token, the project explores how machine generated information can become more trustworthy. Artificial intelligence will continue becoming more powerful, but in the long run power alone will not determine which systems people rely on. The systems that succeed will be the ones that people trust. In a world where knowledge is increasingly generated by machines, the ability to verify that knowledge may become just as important as the intelligence that produces it. @mira_network $MIRA #Mira

Most AI Projects Chase Power Mira Network Chases Trust

When I first started paying attention to Mira Network, it was not because of hype or marketing. It was because the project focuses on a problem that many people in the AI space quietly acknowledge but rarely prioritize. Artificial intelligence is becoming more powerful every month. New models promise stronger reasoning, faster responses, and better performance on benchmarks. The entire industry seems to be racing toward smarter machines. But while everyone talks about intelligence, I keep thinking about something more fundamental. Can we actually trust the answers these systems produce? That question is what made Mira Network stand out to me.
Artificial intelligence today is incredibly capable. It can generate research summaries, write long articles, explain complicated technical ideas, and even help developers build software. The speed at which these systems operate is remarkable. But behind that impressive capability there is a weakness that many users eventually notice. AI does not truly know whether its answers are correct. It predicts patterns based on massive datasets and generates responses that sound logical and confident. Sometimes those responses are accurate. Other times they contain subtle mistakes, outdated information, or details that never existed at all. The industry often describes this problem as hallucination.

The reason hallucinations matter so much is because AI is no longer just a creative tool. It is slowly becoming infrastructure for decision making. Businesses use AI to analyze data, researchers use it to summarize findings, and financial platforms experiment with AI driven insights. In these environments even small errors can create serious consequences. Imagine an automated trading system making decisions based on a statistic that an AI model accidentally invented. Imagine a research assistant summarizing a study but misunderstanding its conclusions. These examples highlight a deeper issue. Artificial intelligence can generate knowledge extremely quickly, but it does not always verify that knowledge.
This is where Mira Network introduces a very different perspective on the future of AI. Instead of focusing on building another large language model, the project is building a decentralized verification layer that evaluates AI generated information. When I first understood this concept it immediately made sense. Rather than trusting a single AI system to determine the truth, Mira Network treats every AI output as something that should be examined before people rely on it.
The verification process begins when an AI model generates a response. Instead of accepting that response as a complete answer, the Mira Network system analyzes the text and breaks it into smaller claims. Each claim represents a specific piece of information that can be evaluated independently. These claims are then distributed across a network of verification nodes. Each node examines the information using its own models, datasets, or analytical tools. Because many participants review the same claims, the system avoids relying on the judgment of a single model.
After validators complete their analysis, the network compares the results and reaches consensus about whether the information is accurate. If enough validators confirm the claim, it becomes verified knowledge. The verification record can then be secured using cryptographic proof which makes the process transparent and resistant to manipulation. What I find compelling about this approach is that it turns AI outputs into something more reliable. Instead of trusting a prediction, the system encourages collective verification.
Another important dimension of Mira Network is its decentralized structure. Today many powerful AI systems are controlled by a small number of technology companies that manage the models and the data behind them. While this has accelerated innovation, it also means that trust is concentrated in the hands of a few organizations. Mira Network distributes verification across a decentralized network where multiple participants evaluate information. This approach encourages transparency and allows different perspectives to contribute to determining accuracy.
The ecosystem is supported by the MIRA token which plays a key role in coordinating the network. Validators who contribute computing resources and analytical work can earn rewards through the token system. By verifying claims they help strengthen the reliability of the network while receiving incentives for their participation. Validators may also stake MIRA tokens when participating in verification tasks which creates accountability. If a validator repeatedly submits incorrect evaluations their stake and reputation may be affected. This mechanism helps align economic incentives with honest behavior.
From my perspective the MIRA token transforms verification into a collaborative economic system. Instead of relying on centralized institutions to check information, the network encourages independent participants to contribute because there is value in maintaining accurate data. When incentives reward reliability the ecosystem becomes more sustainable and resilient.
Thinking about the potential applications makes this idea even more interesting. Financial platforms could rely on verified AI insights before acting on market signals. Research tools could analyze large volumes of data while validating key claims before presenting conclusions. Educational platforms could deliver explanations that have already been checked for accuracy. Even autonomous AI agents could benefit from accessing verified information when making decisions in digital environments.
The importance of this type of infrastructure will likely increase as artificial intelligence becomes more integrated into everyday systems. Businesses already depend on AI driven analysis to process enormous datasets. Governments explore AI tools for policy evaluation. Researchers rely on AI to accelerate scientific discovery. As these systems grow more influential, the reliability of their information will matter just as much as their computational power.
When I think about the evolution of technology, the systems that shape the future are often the ones that create trust. The internet became reliable because communication protocols ensured data could move safely between computers. Blockchain introduced decentralized trust for financial transactions. Artificial intelligence may require a similar layer where information can be verified before it spreads across networks.

Mira Network represents an attempt to build that layer. By combining decentralized verification, AI analysis, and economic incentives through the MIRA token, the project explores how machine generated information can become more trustworthy. Artificial intelligence will continue becoming more powerful, but in the long run power alone will not determine which systems people rely on. The systems that succeed will be the ones that people trust. In a world where knowledge is increasingly generated by machines, the ability to verify that knowledge may become just as important as the intelligence that produces it.
@Mira - Trust Layer of AI
$MIRA
#Mira
·
--
Negatīvs
Skatīt tulkojumu
$XRP is showing clear selling pressure and I see the market losing momentum after the recent rejection. If this weakness continues I expect another drop toward the lower liquidity zone. EP 1.436 TP1 1.420 TP2 1.405 TP3 1.385 SL 1.452 I am watching $XRP closely because strong rejection and lower highs often lead to continuation moves when sellers stay in control. $XRP #xrp
$XRP is showing clear selling pressure and I see the market losing momentum after the recent rejection. If this weakness continues I expect another drop toward the lower liquidity zone.
EP 1.436
TP1 1.420
TP2 1.405
TP3 1.385
SL 1.452
I am watching $XRP closely because strong rejection and lower highs often lead to continuation moves when sellers stay in control.
$XRP

#xrp
$MIRA lielākā daļa AI projektu sacenšas, lai izveidotu gudrākus modeļus, taču Mira Network koncentrējas uz kaut ko, ko nozare bieži ignorē: uzticēšanās AI iznākumiem. Kad mākslīgā inteliģence tiek integrēta pētniecībā, finansēs un automatizācijā, lielākais risks nav spēju trūkums, bet neuzticama informācija. AI sistēmas var ģenerēt pārliecinošas atbildes, kas ir daļēji nepareizas, un, kad šie iznākumi ietekmē lēmumus, mazas kļūdas var ātri palielināties. Mira Network pievēršas šai problēmai, uzskatot AI atbildes par prasījumiem, kuriem jābūt pārbaudītiem. Vietā, lai uzticētos vienam modelim, tīkls izplata verifikāciju starp vairākiem neatkarīgiem validētājiem, kuri pārskata un novērtē katru prasījumu. Izmantojot decentralizētu konsensu un kriptogrāfisku verifikāciju, AI iznākumi kļūst par auditable informāciju, nevis neapstiprinātām prognozēm. Ja AI ir paredzēts pilnībā autonomiem sistēmām, tad reālā infrastruktūra var nebūt tikai inteliģence, bet spēja pierādīt, ka inteliģence ir pareiza. #Mira @mira_network
$MIRA lielākā daļa AI projektu sacenšas, lai izveidotu gudrākus modeļus, taču Mira Network koncentrējas uz kaut ko, ko nozare bieži ignorē: uzticēšanās AI iznākumiem.
Kad mākslīgā inteliģence tiek integrēta pētniecībā, finansēs un automatizācijā, lielākais risks nav spēju trūkums, bet neuzticama informācija. AI sistēmas var ģenerēt pārliecinošas atbildes, kas ir daļēji nepareizas, un, kad šie iznākumi ietekmē lēmumus, mazas kļūdas var ātri palielināties.
Mira Network pievēršas šai problēmai, uzskatot AI atbildes par prasījumiem, kuriem jābūt pārbaudītiem. Vietā, lai uzticētos vienam modelim, tīkls izplata verifikāciju starp vairākiem neatkarīgiem validētājiem, kuri pārskata un novērtē katru prasījumu.
Izmantojot decentralizētu konsensu un kriptogrāfisku verifikāciju, AI iznākumi kļūst par auditable informāciju, nevis neapstiprinātām prognozēm.
Ja AI ir paredzēts pilnībā autonomiem sistēmām, tad reālā infrastruktūra var nebūt tikai inteliģence, bet spēja pierādīt, ka inteliģence ir pareiza.

#Mira @Mira - Trust Layer of AI
Skatīt tulkojumu
BREAKING 🚨 Over $500 billion has been added to the U.S. stock market today. Tech and AI giants like NVIDIA, AMD, Tesla, and Amazon are leading the rally. Strong moves in MicroStrategy are also tracking the rise of Bitcoin, showing risk appetite is returning across markets. This kind of capital flow often fuels momentum in both stocks and crypto. 🚀 #BTC
BREAKING 🚨
Over $500 billion has been added to the U.S. stock market today. Tech and AI giants like NVIDIA, AMD, Tesla, and Amazon are leading the rally.
Strong moves in MicroStrategy are also tracking the rise of Bitcoin, showing risk appetite is returning across markets.
This kind of capital flow often fuels momentum in both stocks and crypto. 🚀

#BTC
$BTC saskaras īstermiņa noraidījumu tuvu augšējai pretestībai, un es redzu, ka pārdevēji iejaucas pēc nesenā uzbrukuma. Ja momentum šeit paliek vāja, es gaidu ātru atsitienu uz zemāku likviditātes zonu. EP 73200 TP1 72800 TP2 72300 TP3 71800 SL 73650 Es uzmanīgi sekoju $BTC , jo, kad cena noraida pretestību pēc kāpuma, tā bieži rada ātru korekciju, kad tirgotāji nodrošina peļņu. $BTC #BTC 📉
$BTC saskaras īstermiņa noraidījumu tuvu augšējai pretestībai, un es redzu, ka pārdevēji iejaucas pēc nesenā uzbrukuma. Ja momentum šeit paliek vāja, es gaidu ātru atsitienu uz zemāku likviditātes zonu.
EP 73200
TP1 72800
TP2 72300
TP3 71800
SL 73650
Es uzmanīgi sekoju $BTC , jo, kad cena noraida pretestību pēc kāpuma, tā bieži rada ātru korekciju, kad tirgotāji nodrošina peļņu.
$BTC

#BTC 📉
Skatīt tulkojumu
$JELLYJELLY just faced long liquidations near 0.086 which flushed weak buyers from the market. When leveraged longs disappear, I usually look for a recovery setup on $JELLYJELLY. EP 0.083 TP1 0.091 TP2 0.101 TP3 0.113 SL 0.074 The flush pushed $JELLYJELLY into a reaction zone and if buyers defend the level, the rebound can develop steadily. I am tracking $JELLYJELLY carefully. #jellyjelly
$JELLYJELLY just faced long liquidations near 0.086 which flushed weak buyers from the market. When leveraged longs disappear, I usually look for a recovery setup on $JELLYJELLY.
EP 0.083
TP1 0.091
TP2 0.101
TP3 0.113
SL 0.074
The flush pushed $JELLYJELLY into a reaction zone and if buyers defend the level, the rebound can develop steadily. I am tracking $JELLYJELLY carefully.
#jellyjelly
Skatīt tulkojumu
$PIPPIN just saw short liquidations near 0.376 which means sellers were forced out. When I see this type of squeeze, continuation upside often follows on $PIPPIN. EP 0.371 TP1 0.405 TP2 0.448 TP3 0.500 SL 0.335 The squeeze removed selling pressure and I see $PIPPIN stabilizing above support. If buyers stay active, the rally can accelerate quickly and I am watching $PIPPIN closely. #Pippin
$PIPPIN just saw short liquidations near 0.376 which means sellers were forced out. When I see this type of squeeze, continuation upside often follows on $PIPPIN.
EP 0.371
TP1 0.405
TP2 0.448
TP3 0.500
SL 0.335
The squeeze removed selling pressure and I see $PIPPIN stabilizing above support. If buyers stay active, the rally can accelerate quickly and I am watching $PIPPIN closely.
#Pippin
Skatīt tulkojumu
$SIGN just triggered short liquidations around 0.0306 which tells me bears were squeezed. When shorts get trapped like this, I usually expect price to push toward higher liquidity on $SIGN. EP 0.0302 TP1 0.0331 TP2 0.0367 TP3 0.0410 SL 0.0272 The squeeze cleared resistance pressure and I see $SIGN holding above demand. If buyers keep momentum, the rally can extend and I am monitoring $SIGN closely. #Sign
$SIGN just triggered short liquidations around 0.0306 which tells me bears were squeezed. When shorts get trapped like this, I usually expect price to push toward higher liquidity on $SIGN .
EP 0.0302
TP1 0.0331
TP2 0.0367
TP3 0.0410
SL 0.0272
The squeeze cleared resistance pressure and I see $SIGN holding above demand. If buyers keep momentum, the rally can extend and I am monitoring $SIGN closely.
#Sign
Skatīt tulkojumu
$VVV just saw short liquidations near 6.39 which means sellers were squeezed out. When I see this type of move, I usually expect continuation strength on $VVV. EP 6.25 TP1 6.85 TP2 7.55 TP3 8.40 SL 5.70 The squeeze removed selling pressure and I see $VVV stabilizing above support. If buyers remain active, the rally can build quickly and I am watching $VVV carefully. #VVV
$VVV just saw short liquidations near 6.39 which means sellers were squeezed out. When I see this type of move, I usually expect continuation strength on $VVV.
EP 6.25
TP1 6.85
TP2 7.55
TP3 8.40
SL 5.70
The squeeze removed selling pressure and I see $VVV stabilizing above support. If buyers remain active, the rally can build quickly and I am watching $VVV carefully.
#VVV
Skatīt tulkojumu
$TAG just triggered short liquidations around 0.00042 which signals trapped sellers. When shorts get forced out like this, continuation upside often follows on $TAG. EP 0.00041 TP1 0.00046 TP2 0.00052 TP3 0.00060 SL 0.00037 The squeeze cleared resistance pressure and I see $TAG holding above demand. If momentum continues, the rally can expand quickly and I am tracking $TAG closely. #tag
$TAG just triggered short liquidations around 0.00042 which signals trapped sellers. When shorts get forced out like this, continuation upside often follows on $TAG.
EP 0.00041
TP1 0.00046
TP2 0.00052
TP3 0.00060
SL 0.00037
The squeeze cleared resistance pressure and I see $TAG holding above demand. If momentum continues, the rally can expand quickly and I am tracking $TAG closely.
#tag
$ETH tikko pieredzējušas garas likvidācijas tuvu 2149, kas iznīcināja vājos pircējus no tirgus. Kad sviras garie darījumi tiek iztīrīti šādi, es bieži sekoju atgūšanas iespējām uz $ETH. EP 2125 TP1 2210 TP2 2315 TP3 2450 SL 2010 Izsistā likvidācija virzīja $ETH uz spēcīgas pieprasījuma zonas, un ja pircēji aizsargā līmeni, atgūšanas kustība var veidoties pakāpeniski. Es uzmanīgi skatos uz $ETH , lai redzētu atgriešanās momentu. #ETH
$ETH tikko pieredzējušas garas likvidācijas tuvu 2149, kas iznīcināja vājos pircējus no tirgus. Kad sviras garie darījumi tiek iztīrīti šādi, es bieži sekoju atgūšanas iespējām uz $ETH .
EP 2125
TP1 2210
TP2 2315
TP3 2450
SL 2010
Izsistā likvidācija virzīja $ETH uz spēcīgas pieprasījuma zonas, un ja pircēji aizsargā līmeni, atgūšanas kustība var veidoties pakāpeniski. Es uzmanīgi skatos uz $ETH , lai redzētu atgriešanās momentu.
#ETH
Skatīt tulkojumu
$PHA just triggered short liquidations near 0.0478 and that tells me bears were forced out. When I see this type of squeeze, I usually expect price to search for higher liquidity on $PHA. EP 0.0469 TP1 0.0515 TP2 0.0568 TP3 0.0635 SL 0.0425 The squeeze cleared resistance pressure and I see $PHA holding above a reaction zone. If buyers remain active, the rally can extend quickly and I am monitoring $PHA closely. #PHA
$PHA just triggered short liquidations near 0.0478 and that tells me bears were forced out. When I see this type of squeeze, I usually expect price to search for higher liquidity on $PHA .
EP 0.0469
TP1 0.0515
TP2 0.0568
TP3 0.0635
SL 0.0425
The squeeze cleared resistance pressure and I see $PHA holding above a reaction zone. If buyers remain active, the rally can extend quickly and I am monitoring $PHA closely.
#PHA
$ONDO tikko redzēja īsas likvidācijas ap 0.271, kas norāda uz iesprostotiem pārdevējiem tirgū. Kad es redzu šādu spiedienu, turpinājums uz augšu bieži seko $ONDO. EP 0.268 TP1 0.293 TP2 0.322 TP3 0.357 SL 0.243 Spiediens noņēma pārdošanas spiedienu un es redzu $ONDO stabilizēšanos virs pieprasījuma. Ja moments turpinās, kāpums var paātrināties un es sekoju $ONDO gandrīz. #ONDO
$ONDO tikko redzēja īsas likvidācijas ap 0.271, kas norāda uz iesprostotiem pārdevējiem tirgū. Kad es redzu šādu spiedienu, turpinājums uz augšu bieži seko $ONDO .
EP 0.268
TP1 0.293
TP2 0.322
TP3 0.357
SL 0.243
Spiediens noņēma pārdošanas spiedienu un es redzu $ONDO stabilizēšanos virs pieprasījuma. Ja moments turpinās, kāpums var paātrināties un es sekoju $ONDO gandrīz.
#ONDO
Skatīt tulkojumu
$FARTCOIN just triggered short liquidations near 0.176 which means sellers were squeezed out of the market. When shorts get trapped like this, I usually expect continuation momentum on $FARTCOIN. EP 0.173 TP1 0.191 TP2 0.213 TP3 0.238 SL 0.156 The squeeze cleared resistance pressure and I see $FARTCOIN holding above support. If buyers stay active, the rally can expand quickly and I am tracking $FARTCOIN carefully. #FARTCOİN
$FARTCOIN just triggered short liquidations near 0.176 which means sellers were squeezed out of the market. When shorts get trapped like this, I usually expect continuation momentum on $FARTCOIN.
EP 0.173
TP1 0.191
TP2 0.213
TP3 0.238
SL 0.156
The squeeze cleared resistance pressure and I see $FARTCOIN holding above support. If buyers stay active, the rally can expand quickly and I am tracking $FARTCOIN carefully.
#FARTCOİN
Skatīt tulkojumu
$GUA just faced long liquidations near 0.266 and that tells me weak buyers were flushed from the market. When I see leveraged longs getting cleared like this, I usually look for a rebound setup on $GUA. EP 0.259 TP1 0.282 TP2 0.308 TP3 0.342 SL 0.235 The flush removed weak hands and I see GUA stabilizing near a reaction zone. If buyers return, the recovery move on $GUA can build quickly and I am watching $GUA closely. #gua
$GUA just faced long liquidations near 0.266 and that tells me weak buyers were flushed from the market. When I see leveraged longs getting cleared like this, I usually look for a rebound setup on $GUA.
EP 0.259
TP1 0.282
TP2 0.308
TP3 0.342
SL 0.235
The flush removed weak hands and I see GUA stabilizing near a reaction zone. If buyers return, the recovery move on $GUA can build quickly and I am watching $GUA closely.
#gua
$FOGO tikai redzēju īsas likvidācijas tuvu 0.023, kas nozīmē, ka lāči tika izspiežami ārā. Kad redzu, ka īsie tiek spiestas ārā tā, kā šis, turpinājums uz augšu bieži seko uz $FOGO. EP 0.0226 TP1 0.0249 TP2 0.0278 TP3 0.0315 SL 0.0205 Izspiešana notīrīja pretestības spiedienu, un es redzu, ka $FOGO turas virs pieprasījuma. Ja impulss turpinās, nākamā viļņa uzplaukums var ātri paplašināties, un es uzmanīgi sekoju $FOGO . #fogo
$FOGO tikai redzēju īsas likvidācijas tuvu 0.023, kas nozīmē, ka lāči tika izspiežami ārā. Kad redzu, ka īsie tiek spiestas ārā tā, kā šis, turpinājums uz augšu bieži seko uz $FOGO .
EP 0.0226
TP1 0.0249
TP2 0.0278
TP3 0.0315
SL 0.0205
Izspiešana notīrīja pretestības spiedienu, un es redzu, ka $FOGO turas virs pieprasījuma. Ja impulss turpinās, nākamā viļņa uzplaukums var ātri paplašināties, un es uzmanīgi sekoju $FOGO .
#fogo
Skatīt tulkojumu
$BARD just triggered short liquidations near 1.00 and that signals trapped sellers in the market. When I see this kind of squeeze, I usually expect price to push toward higher liquidity on $BARD. EP 0.99 TP1 1.08 TP2 1.20 TP3 1.36 SL 0.90 The squeeze removed selling pressure and I see $BARD stabilizing above support. If buyers stay active, the rally can build steadily and I am watching $BARD closely. #Bard
$BARD just triggered short liquidations near 1.00 and that signals trapped sellers in the market. When I see this kind of squeeze, I usually expect price to push toward higher liquidity on $BARD .
EP 0.99
TP1 1.08
TP2 1.20
TP3 1.36
SL 0.90
The squeeze removed selling pressure and I see $BARD stabilizing above support. If buyers stay active, the rally can build steadily and I am watching $BARD closely.
#Bard
$ARC tikko redzēju īsas likvidācijas apmēram 0.041, kas man liek domāt, ka pārdevēji tika izspiest no tirgus. Kad īsie tiek iesprostoti tā, es parasti sagaidu turpinājuma momentu uz $ARC. EP 0.0405 TP1 0.0448 TP2 0.0495 TP3 0.0550 SL 0.0368 Izspiešana iztīrīja pretestības spiedienu, un es redzu, ka $ARC turas virs reakcijas zonas. Ja pircēji paliek aktīvi, pieaugums var ātri paplašināties, un es uzmanīgi sekoju $ARC . #ARC
$ARC tikko redzēju īsas likvidācijas apmēram 0.041, kas man liek domāt, ka pārdevēji tika izspiest no tirgus. Kad īsie tiek iesprostoti tā, es parasti sagaidu turpinājuma momentu uz $ARC.
EP 0.0405
TP1 0.0448
TP2 0.0495
TP3 0.0550
SL 0.0368
Izspiešana iztīrīja pretestības spiedienu, un es redzu, ka $ARC turas virs reakcijas zonas. Ja pircēji paliek aktīvi, pieaugums var ātri paplašināties, un es uzmanīgi sekoju $ARC .
#ARC
Skatīt tulkojumu
$BANANAS31 just triggered short liquidations near 0.00521 which means bears were forced out. When I see this kind of move, continuation upside often follows on $BANANAS31. EP 0.00510 TP1 0.00565 TP2 0.00630 TP3 0.00710 SL 0.00455 The squeeze shows buyers stepping back into the market and I see $BANANAS31 holding above demand. If momentum continues, the move can expand quickly and I am monitoring $BANANAS31 closely. #bananas31s
$BANANAS31 just triggered short liquidations near 0.00521 which means bears were forced out. When I see this kind of move, continuation upside often follows on $BANANAS31 .
EP 0.00510
TP1 0.00565
TP2 0.00630
TP3 0.00710
SL 0.00455
The squeeze shows buyers stepping back into the market and I see $BANANAS31 holding above demand. If momentum continues, the move can expand quickly and I am monitoring $BANANAS31 closely.
#bananas31s
$HYPE tikko redzēju īsas likvidācijas ap 31.7, kas norāda uz iesprostotiem pārdevējiem tirgū. Kad es redzu šāda veida spiedienu, es parasti gaidu, ka tirgus virzīsies uz augstāku likviditāti uz $HYPE. EP 31.2 TP1 33.8 TP2 36.9 TP3 41.5 SL 28.4 Spiediens noņēma pretestības spiedienu un es redzu, ka $HYPE stabilizējas virs atbalsta. Ja moments turpinās, rallijs var ātri paātrināties un es uzmanīgi vēroju $HYPE . #hype
$HYPE tikko redzēju īsas likvidācijas ap 31.7, kas norāda uz iesprostotiem pārdevējiem tirgū. Kad es redzu šāda veida spiedienu, es parasti gaidu, ka tirgus virzīsies uz augstāku likviditāti uz $HYPE.
EP 31.2
TP1 33.8
TP2 36.9
TP3 41.5
SL 28.4
Spiediens noņēma pretestības spiedienu un es redzu, ka $HYPE stabilizējas virs atbalsta. Ja moments turpinās, rallijs var ātri paātrināties un es uzmanīgi vēroju $HYPE .
#hype
Pieraksties, lai skatītu citu saturu
Uzzini jaunākās kriptovalūtu ziņas
⚡️ Iesaisties jaunākajās diskusijās par kriptovalūtām
💬 Mijiedarbojies ar saviem iemīļotākajiem satura veidotājiem
👍 Apskati tevi interesējošo saturu
E-pasta adrese / tālruņa numurs
Vietnes plāns
Sīkdatņu preferences
Platformas noteikumi