RISKEE_MID

STON.fi + Omniston — From Partnerships to Infrastructure: why DeFi integrations should solve problems, not sell logos
Partnership announcements have become a ritual in crypto: coordinated tweets, co-branded images, and short lived user-growth pushes. But a recent interview and the follow-on integrations around one TON native project argue for a different playbook — one that treats collaborations as infrastructure decisions first and marketing second. The interview framed the evaluation of every partnership around a simple, functional question: will this integration remove friction for builders and end users, or will it add another layer they must work around?
A pragmatic framework for evaluating DeFi partnerships
Three filters are central to this approach.
1) Functional fit. The primary metric is technical and economic utility. If an integration doesn’t solve a concrete problem — routing, settlement, wallet UX, gas abstraction — it’s unlikely to produce meaningful adoption. Prioritizing utility shifts conversations away from short-term PR toward engineering work that actually matters to developer workflows and user journeys. This emphasis is highlighted repeatedly in the interview and in follow-up reporting on the protocol’s roadmap.
2) Scalability and resilience. Many integrations work fine under light load but fail during spikes or when extended cross-chain. The focus here is on architecture that preserves routing and execution reliability as volumes grow. That means testing under realistic traffic, designing fallback routes, and ensuring statefulness (or statelessness) is handled where it matters. Documentation and engineering blogs from the project team describe how the aggregator moved from a basic liquidity-layer concept toward a production execution engine with robustness as a priority.
3) Embeddability (distribution as a byproduct). Rather than chasing distribution via ad campaigns, this model aims to become part of other teams’ core stacks. When a routing or execution layer is embedded in wallets, SDKs, or infrastructure tooling, distribution emerges organically — teams choose the technology because it solves a problem in their dev lifecycle. Over time, that makes the integration feel like a utility rather than a plugin, raising replacement costs and deepening network effects. Reporting on recent integrations shows exactly this: developers can add token swaps in minutes by embedding the aggregator under the hood, which naturally drives usage without short-term incentives.
Case study: Privy — embedding swaps where users already are
A concrete example of the model in action is the integration with an embedded-wallet provider that focuses on developer ease-of-use and user onboarding. By plugging the aggregator into the wallet stack, teams that adopt the embedded wallet get immediate access to seamless token swap functionality without building a swap backend themselves. Technical guides and recipes published by the wallet provider show how to add swap flows using the aggregator, illustrating the embed-and-ship pattern that drives organic adoption.
This is powerful for two reasons:
It reduces friction for non-technical users (no bridge, no complex UX) and for teams (no custom routing code).It places the aggregator deeper in the application lifecycle — early in product development rather than as a late-stage add-on — increasing the odds that teams continue to rely on the integration as they scale.
Why this matters for the broader TON ecosystem (and beyond)
The strategic orientation outlined in the interview isn’t just internal doctrine — it responds to concrete market realities on the Telegram-native chain. By prioritizing engineering-first partnerships and resilient execution, the project has captured a dominant share of swap activity on the chain and positioned its aggregator as the default route for many app teams. When routing becomes infrastructure, the chain’s overall developer experience improves: teams spend less time on plumbing and more on product differentiation.
And this has spillover effects: reliable on-chain tooling lowers the barrier to cross-chain expansion and to onboarding mainstream users who expect simple, resilient apps.
Practical takeaways for builders and protocol teams
Ask the functional question first: before a marketing announcement, require a technical spec showing how the integration removes work for at least one developer persona.Test for real traffic: simulate failure modes and peak loads; prefer integrations with clear fallback strategies.Design for embedability: publish SDKs, recipes, and minimal-effort examples so partner teams can add features in minutes. The more painless the embed, the faster distribution follows.
Closing: from feature to utility
The shift from viewing partnerships as promotional opportunities to treating them as infrastructure choices changes incentives across the stack. When collaborations are judged by whether they remove friction, increase resilience, and enable embedability, they stop being ephemeral and start being foundational. Over time, that pattern leads to more durable network effects and more robust ecosystems — not because of bigger launch tweets, but because products built on top of the stack are simply easier to ship and harder to replace.
For further reading, the original interview and related coverage provide additional context and technical detail: read the full interview and coverage on Coin Edition and the project’s engineering posts.

Sources & further links
Full interview and background reporting: Coin Edition.Integration guide: Privy + aggregator recipes.Engineering and roadmap notes from the protocol blog.Coverage on execution & market share commentary.
Follow this links below 
coinedition.com
blog.ston.fi
docs.privy.io
bitget.com

How STON.fi's Daily APR Channel on Telegram Is Fixing Yield Friction
Yield farming and liquidity provision are powerful engines for decentralized finance — but they run on information. APRs move constantly: pool utilization, swap volumes, reward schedules, and token incentives all push returns up and down. For many users, that volatility is less a feature than a burden. People who want to chase good yields face a practical problem: they don’t have time to watch dozens of pools, and dashboards feel heavy, technical, and detached from where their conversations already happen.
Enter a deceptively simple idea: bring the numbers to the user. Instead of building another dashboard that users must remember to check, STON.fi delivers daily APR updates directly into the chat app many TON users already live in. That small UX decision — light, regular reports inside an existing social environment — changes behavior in ways that matter.
From inertia to informed action
Behavioral friction is the unseen tax of DeFi. When yield information is hard to access or interpret, the rational response for many participants is inertia: stay put rather than pay the cognitive and operational costs to move capital. That conservatism isn’t always bad, but it does mean liquidity can become misallocated; high-performing pools go underfunded because people simply don’t know or can’t act quickly.
Automated reporting attacks that inertia at the source. A short, daily snapshot of APRs and incentive shifts reduces the informational cost of monitoring pools. Because the updates arrive in the same place users already check messages, the additional attention required is minimal. Over time, this small reduction in friction changes the calculus: monitoring becomes habitual, comparative thinking becomes easier, and reallocations become more targeted and less emotional.
Teaching users to compare, not chase
One-off alerts and flashy APY figures can encourage frantic migration — liquidity hopping from pool to pool whenever a headline number spikes. By contrast, a consistent daily cadence builds a dataset users can learn from. When users see how pools behave across days and market regimes, they start to distinguish between noise and structural trends. Is a pool’s APR spiking because of a temporary reward boost? Is utilization steady or volatile? Which pools deliver persistent, risk-adjusted returns?
This comparative thinking improves individual decisions — and the health of the protocol. Rather than reactive migrations that amplify volatility, liquidity flows become more thoughtful. Users make moves based on observed patterns and risk trade-offs instead of chasing headline numbers.
Lower operational cost, higher participation
Operational costs — the time, gas, and attention required to move capital — are real. Streamlining the “monitoring” step lowers the psychological and practical barriers to active participation. A daily digest that highlights utilization, recent trading activity, and the net effect of incentive schedules makes it far easier to detect when an action is worth the transaction fees and effort.
Because the format is lightweight and focused, it also invites newcomers. Instead of an intimidating dashboard, a simple update can act as a primer: here’s what to watch, here’s why it changed, and here’s the sensible response. That lowers onboarding friction and broadens the base of participants who can contribute to deep, resilient liquidity.
Transparency as social proof
Transparent, regular communication performs another function: it builds trust. When performance metrics aren’t tucked behind complex interfaces or selectively showcased, users feel more confident that the protocol isn’t hiding inconvenient truths. Regular, predictable reporting signals that the project values clarity over hype — and clarity breeds longer-term participation.
Moreover, delivering that transparency in a communal channel creates social proof. Peers see the same updates, discuss them, and collectively develop norms about acceptable risk and reasonable responses. That social layer helps stabilize behavior and reduces the herd mentality that can accompany one-off, sensational APR announcements.
Design choices that matter
Two design principles make the daily APR channel effective:
Proximity — Put data where users already spend time. Integrating updates into an app that’s part of users’ daily routines reduces the activation energy required to engage with yield data.Simplicity — Deliver the essentials: current APR, utilization, recent incentive changes, and a one-line interpretation. Too many numbers overwhelm; a concise digest invites action.
Combined, these principles turn reporting from a luxury feature into a core utility that changes how capital is allocated.
What this means for the TON DeFi ecosystem
As DeFi on TON scales, institutions and retail users alike will favor systems that respect time and attention. Protocols that centralize critical signals in accessible formats strengthen not only their own liquidity but the broader ecosystem. Predictable, transparent reporting helps allocate capital more efficiently, encourages prudent risk management, and fosters sustained user engagement.
If you care about yield that’s both accessible and responsibly allocated, following pool updates is a simple, high-leverage habit. Want to try it? Join the daily updates channel at t.me/stonfi_updates and see how small, consistent signals can transform your yield decisions.

#Telegram #BTCMiningDifficultyIncrease

How STON.fi turned grants into a distributed testing framework (featuring Omniston, TON) — read the full interview on CoinEdition
Ecosystem funding is usually pitched as a set of incentives: give teams money, expect new features, liquidity, and users. The STON.fi approach reframes that model. Rather than treating grants as one-way rewards, STON.fi uses them as an instrument for distributed, real-world testing — a deliberate, low-friction way to discover what the platform actually needs by watching how external builders use it.
Grants as distributed experiments
Instead of centralizing product roadmaps or guessing future demand, STON.fi funds scores of TON-native teams across wallets, games, payments, and social apps. Each grantee effectively becomes a live experiment. When teams integrate STON.fi’s tooling and liquidity primitives, they subject the system to a wide range of usage patterns that internal QA and lab tests cannot reproduce: bursty micro-payments from games, cross-wallet routing under realistic latency, or complex multi-party payment flows inside social apps.
Those integrations expose concrete limits — routing edge-cases, shallow liquidity in certain corridors, and missing developer ergonomics — which are far more valuable than hypothetical feature lists. The grant becomes the mechanism for discovery, and every integration yields empirical telemetry and developer feedback.
Continuous feedback, iterative infrastructure
This isn’t just one-off insight collection. The pattern creates a feedback loop: builders surface friction; infrastructure teams adapt; improved tooling lowers onboarding costs; more builders join. Over repeated cycles, the system matures organically.
Because changes respond to observed needs rather than product speculation, STON.fi avoids over-engineering. Instead of building large, risky features no one uses, the project can prioritize incremental improvements that demonstrably unblock real teams. The result is faster value capture for users and more efficient engineering spend.
Decentralizing innovation and risk
Grants also shift where experimentation happens. Rather than concentrating R&D inside a single team, STON.fi distributes bets across the ecosystem. This diversification achieves two important outcomes:
It spreads technological risk — not every experiment needs to succeed to surface useful lessons.It creates a library of reference implementations: the simplest integrations that worked in production become templates other teams can copy or extend.
Those reference patterns speed future integrations and reduce the cost of composing new applications on top of the network.
Liquidity, composability, and network effects
As teams adopt common infrastructure standards, integration costs decline and composability improves. Routing and liquidity issues identified during early experiments can be addressed at the protocol or tooling layer, making subsequent integrations easier and more robust. Over time, these incremental gains compound: deeper liquidity attracts more users and integrators, which in turn spawns more innovation — a virtuous cycle that is emergent rather than centrally planned.
Importantly, this growth is measured in practical metrics: reduced integration time, fewer support tickets, increased transaction success rates, and measurable increases in on-chain liquidity depth for commonly used token pairs.
Practical advantages over classic grants programs
Traditional grant programs have value, but they often suffer from two common weaknesses: they either fund noise (projects that never ship) or they attempt to direct development through top-down feature mandates. The distributed testing approach minimizes both problems by:
Favoring short, targeted grants tied to integration milestones, which encourage shipping and produce quick learnings.Using grantee telemetry and qualitative developer feedback to inform where platform investment yields the largest ROI.Scaling improvements horizontally — tooling and primitives that help one team will likely help dozens.
Risks and mitigations
No approach is risk-free. Distributed experiments can generate fragmentation if integrations diverge wildly, or create coordination overhead if many teams require bespoke solutions. STON.fi mitigates these risks by prioritizing modular primitives, publishing reference implementations, and maintaining clear developer documentation and SDKs. Grants that produce reusable components receive additional amplification, accelerating standardization.
The long game: collective learning over single upgrades
The notable insight from this strategy is that collective, iterative learning can be more valuable than any single product upgrade. By letting the ecosystem reveal its pain points, STON.fi channels scarce engineering capacity toward the problems that actually limit adoption. Over time, as more applications converge on shared infrastructure and standards, TON’s overall composability and developer velocity improve — a network-level upgrade that grows from many small, well-observed changes rather than a few large releases.

STON.fi’s grants-as-testing-framework is an elegant inversion of the usual funding playbook: funding becomes a discovery engine, and the ecosystem — not a central product roadmap — signals what matters. For a deeper, on-the-record walkthrough of this strategy, Read full interview here: coinedition.com/inside-ston-fi...

Как STON.fi и Tonation делают свапы невидимыми для пользователей на TON
Интеграция между двумя проектами демонстрирует важный сдвиг в дизайне DeFi: биржевой функционал перестаёт быть «местом», куда нужно идти, и становится службой, встроенной в продукт. Вместо того чтобы заставлять пользователя покидать приложение ради обмена токена, платформа обрабатывает конвертацию в фоне — доноры отдают то, что у них есть, а авторы получают предпочитаемый актив. Это устраняет главный барьер в потоке пожертвований и повышает коэффициент завершения транзакций.
Почему это важно для пожертвований на стримах
Основная причина отказа от пожертвований — фрикция конвертации. Когда зрителю нужно выйти из стрима, найти децентрализованную биржу, совершить обмен и вернуться — часть аудитории теряется. Встроенные свапы сокращают воронку: одно действие в интерфейсе заменяет несколько рыночных шагов, сохраняется контекст взаимодействия, и пользовательское внимание не рассеивается. Для зрителя процесс ощущается как привычный одношаговый платёж.
Техническая архитектура: маршрутизация как утилита
Сердце решения — надёжный роутинг-слой, который берёт на себя поиск цены, источники ликвидности, выбор путей и исполнение операций. Приложения получают простой API: «принять X — доставить Y», а всё сложное скрыто. Такой подход переводит DeFi-компоненты в разряд платежных рельс — разработчики больше не должны становиться экспертами по маркетмейкингу или агрегаторам ликвидности; они интегрируют проверенный примитив и фокусируются на продукте и опыте пользователей.
Влияние на экосистему и принятие технологии
Для экосистемы блокчейна фундаментальным становится невидимое функционирование. Люди заходят за контентом — не за протоколом. Когда конвертация проходит без разрыва контекста, блокчейн начинает работать «в фоне», что снижает порог входа для новичков и стимулирует органический рост on-chain активности. Частые микроплатежи и чаевые, которые раньше было невыгодно или неудобно совершать, становятся жизнеспособной моделью монетизации.
Продуктовые и поведенческие эффекты
Последствия очевидны и измеримы: повышается коэффициент конверсии донатов, растёт частота микроплатежей, создатели контента получают более предсказуемые выплаты, а удержание увеличивается. По мере того как больше платформ используют одни и те же «рельсы», эффекты сети усиливаются: ликвидность концентрируется, а встроенные свапы становятся быстрее и дешевле для конечного пользователя.
Риски и дизайн-контроли
Сделать свапы невидимыми можно только при строгом контроле рисков. Необходимо обеспечить прозрачность по комиссиям и ожидаемой сумме доставки, ввести ограничения по слиппеджу, гарантировать условия расчёта и время расчётов для получателей, а также поддерживать высокий уровень аудита и безопасности. UX должен информировать пользователей — без раскрытия рыночной механики — чтобы не подрывать доверие.
Вывод
Интеграция показывает: DeFi расширяется не за счёт вынужденного привлечения внимания, а за счёт того, что становится частью привычных продуктов. Когда свапы превращаются в утилитарную инфраструктуру, а не в отдельный опыт, платформы для создателей могут легче собирать ценность, а пользователи — совершать операции без лишних шагов. Именно такой подход — интеграция вместо прерывания — делает масштабирование на практике возможным.

Come l'integrazione di STON.fi con Tonation fa scomparire gli scambi
L'integrazione recente tra STON.fi e Tonation illustra un cambiamento fondamentale nel design DeFi: gli scambi decentralizzati non sono più posizionati come destinazioni da visitare per gli utenti, ma come infrastruttura invisibile incorporata all'interno dei prodotti esistenti. Trasformando il routing dei token e l'esecuzione in un servizio di background, questa integrazione rimuove un punto di attrito persistente per gli spettatori in streaming — e facendo ciò, dimostra come l'attività on-chain possa scalare diventando invisibile.

RAMM.AI token claim: what to know and how to act
The RAMM token claim is live — a structured, time-sensitive rollout that opens access to the project’s agentic Web3 + AI commerce ecosystem. If you participated in CVPad allocations, you can claim your allocation now via Spring’s claim portal. Key partners and details to note up front: BitMart has announced a primary listing, the claim portal is hosted through the Spring platform (spring.net) via CVPad, and the on-chain token lives on the BASE network. Spring CVPad.
Quick summary (the essentials)
Claim portal: Spring (spring.net/allocations) — use the specific allocation page provided by CVPad.Claim time (as announced): 18:30 UTC (claim window / TGE notifications from the project and CVPad).Blockchain / contract: BASE network — contract 0x141d30ABcDDfD07eb9eF967B2C986b2285d3DAB3 (verify in your wallet before interacting).Primary listing: BitMart — trading pair RAMM/USDT, with deposit/trade/withdrawal schedule published by the exchange.Vesting (allocation rules): Public: 25% at TGE, 1-month cliff, then 3-month linear vesting. Private: 10% at TGE, 4-month cliff, then ~10-month linear vesting. Confirm the allocation details in your CVPad allocation page.Refund window: a short refund mechanism is in place (project/launchpad-specific — check the official refund form/process and deadlines).
What this means for you (practical takeaways)
Verify before you claim. Make sure your wallet is set to the BASE network and that the token contract matches 0x141d30ABcDDfD07eb9eF967B2C986b2285d3DAB3. Scammers often reuse project names with fake contracts.Gas & claim mechanics. Spring’s claim portal typically requires a wallet signature and gas to move the token to your wallet; Spring supports automated claiming flows but you must initiate the claim from your Spring portfolio / allocation page. Keep small gas ready.Plan for vesting. Only a portion of allocations are unlocked at TGE. Your immediate balance will reflect the unlocked share; remaining tokens will follow the cliff + linear schedule. Don’t assume full liquidity at TGE.Listing liquidity & timing. BitMart’s listing provides a primary trading venue and initial liquidity. Timing between claim/TGE and exchange trading can create short windows of price volatility; trade carefully.Refund option. If the project/launchpad offers a post-TGE refund window, read the exact refund instructions and deadlines (forms or portal links provided by the launchpad). Don’t miss the short refund window if you plan to use it.
Step-by-step claim checklist
Open your allocation on Spring (spring.net/allocations) and confirm the deal/amount shown is correct.Confirm the token contract exactly matches 0x141d30ABcDDfD07eb9eF967B2C986b2285d3DAB3 and that the network selected is BASE.Make sure your wallet has sufficient BASE gas (or ETH equivalent on Base) and is ready to sign the transaction.Click “Claim” from your Spring portfolio at the announced claim time (or during the claim window). Keep receipts/screenshots of transaction IDs.If you change your mind and a formal refund window is offered, follow the published refund form/process within the allowed time.
Security & best practices
Cross-check the official RAMM, CVPad, Spring, and BitMart announcements before you claim. Use only links published on official channels (project X/Twitter, BitMart support page, CVPad dashboard, and Spring portal).Beware of phishing: never paste your seed phrase in a website, and avoid wallet connections requested from unknown pages.Small test: if you’re uncertain, try a small claim or interaction first (where possible) to confirm the flow works as expected.
Looking ahead — why this matters
RAMM’s approach positions token utility at the center of an AI-powered commerce network: tokenized incentives for brands, creators, and buyers, plus “agentic” AI tools that automate campaign and commerce workflows. A primary exchange listing adds discoverability and trading access; a secure, orderly claim through Spring + CVPad helps reduce chaotic launches that often harm long-term token health.

Perché la partecipazione di STON.fi agli eventi di Hong Kong è un segnale strategico per TON e DeFi istituzionale
La partecipazione di STON.fi al Consensus di Hong Kong e al RWA Summit non è solo un'attività di PR. È un indicatore di una svolta strategica verso l'integrazione istituzionale, la regolamentazione e la costruzione di infrastrutture di lungo termine.

Why STON.fi’s Week in Hong Kong Matters — and what it signals for TON and institutional DeFi
STON.fi’s appearance at major industry gatherings last week wasn’t just another marketing stop. By showing up at STON.fi, Consensus Hong Kong, and the RWA Summit Hong Kong, the project signaled a deliberate push toward institutional relevance and real-world integration — a strategic shift that’s worth unpacking for anyone watching TON and the broader Web3 stack.

Consensus Hong Kong: visibility where tooling and capital converge
Consensus Hong Kong has rapidly become one of Asia’s must-attend gatherings for developers, VCs, and infrastructure teams. Being on that show floor — and taking part in sessions about liquidity design and active capital allocation — places STON.fi where standards, partnerships, and liquidity flows start to crystallize. That kind of presence rarely yields immediate token price fireworks; it shapes product roadmaps, integrations, and counterparty relationships that bear fruit months later.
RWA Summit: the hard work of marrying compliance and DeFi
The RWA Summit is explicitly engineered to wrestle with the operational, custody, and regulatory challenges of tokenizing real-world assets. STON.fi’s participation in RWA panels (and the Summit’s roster of TradFi and regulated-player speakers) signals that the team is engaging with the messy — but essential — parts of institutionalization: legal wrappers, KYC/AML expectations, custody workflows, and settlement rails. Those conversations are the bridge between experimental DeFi and regulated capital markets.

A timely regulatory backdrop — why Hong Kong (and Asia) matters now
Regulators and regional policymakers are moving fast on RWA frameworks. Recent announcements across Greater China and Hong Kong have created a much more active regulatory conversation about how tokenized assets can be issued and governed offshore while being compliant with onshore rules. That regulatory momentum makes participation in Hong Kong-based summits especially strategic: companies that demonstrate compliance-forward thinking are better positioned for institutional partnerships and custody relationships.
What this means for the TON ecosystem
TON isn’t just a protocol — it’s tightly coupled with Telegram’s product funnel and user base. For the TON ecosystem to cross from early adopters into mainstream and institutional usage, it needs partners who can translate DeFi primitives into TradFi workflows. STON.fi’s panels and meetings with asset managers, custodians, and infrastructure providers help create the preconditions for that translation: on-chain tooling that respects off-chain constraints (settlement, reporting, custodian controls), and business relationships that unlock regulated capital. Early signs of institutional interest — and growing ecosystem metrics — suggest these efforts are paying off.
Practical implications — three things to watch next
Product roadmaps that show institutional features. Look for announcements about custody partnerships, audited tokenization flows, or escrowed settlement modules — these are the immediate outputs of RWA-focused conversations.Cross-chain and custody integrations. Institutional usage often demands multi-chain support plus regulated custody; partnerships or integrations with custody providers will be key signals.Regulatory alignment and on-ramps. Watch for legal frameworks or whitepapers that map tokenized assets to local rules — those are the guardrails institutions require.
Why long-term positioning beats short-term noise
Conferences don’t guarantee success — but they do reveal intent. For projects aiming to scale beyond retail zeal and memetic cycles, repeated, public engagement with regulators, asset managers, and infrastructure partners is the slow work of building credibility. STON.fi’s week in Hong Kong is best read as part of that slow work: putting technical capabilities, people, and public commitments in front of the institutions whose capital and compliance will define the next phase of DeFi adoption.
Check it yourself here: https://rwasummit.hk/

Why $GOHOME Feels “Built Different” — community and mindset over hype
Memecoins usually follow a familiar arc: noise, a rapid pump, hype-fueled listings, then a fast fade as teams cash out and holders are left staring at red numbers. What makes this project feel different isn’t marketing spin — it’s a set of deliberate design choices and a culture that rewards conviction over clicks. Below I unpack how that combination — tokenomics, psychology, community governance, and engineering — creates a project that feels more like a home than a headline.
Not about quick flips — a different goal
Most memecoins are optimized for the next viral moment. This project flips that script. The messaging is explicit: this isn’t about “get rich fast” posts or chasing the next exchange announcement. The narrative is long-run conviction — people who want to be part of a culture, not a fleeting cap table. That changes behavior: holders are incentivized to think in months and years, not minutes. When a project’s identity centers on durability, everyone reads the roadmap with a different mindset — that of a gardener, not a day trader.
Tokenomics that support ownership psychology
At the heart of the logic is a fixed, modest total supply (~10 million). That’s a meaningful psychological design choice:
No endless dilution. Fixed supply removes recurring surprise emissions from the team or VCs that can rapidly erode trust.Low circulating supply = strong scarcity narrative. Moving “1 → 10 → 100” is psychologically easier to imagine when you’re not comparing to billions of tokens. Small-supply tokens let fractional gains feel attainable without astronomical market caps.Aligns incentives. With no hidden emission buckets to decay the token’s value, the incentives for the devs and the community align more closely with long-term health.
These are not just marketing talking points; they’re behavioral levers. Scarcity + clarity tends to reduce panic selling and promote deliberate accumulation.
Community-first mindset — culture as the moat
What separates many long-lived projects from ones that flame out is culture. This one prioritizes:
Transparent updates over cryptic PR. When teams share progress, missteps, and priorities openly, the community trusts decisions and is ready to participate constructively.No VC baggage. Without heavy venture ownership, the roadmaps and governance decisions are less likely to be driven by outside exit timelines.Positive energy and ownership. People stay because they enjoy being part of the community — memes, events, governance proposals, and boots-on-the-ground contributions. That social capital becomes the real moat.
Community-first projects treat holders as members, not passive speculators. That subtle difference changes how people post, vote, and contribute.
Built on Solana rails, powered by “diamond hands”
Fast, cheap transactions make the experience pleasant: lower friction for interacting with contracts, participating in drops, and moving tokens. But rails are only the enabler — the real power comes from the holders. The phrase “diamond handed believers” isn’t just meme-speak here; it’s shorthand for a crowd that’s tolerant of volatility because they buy into the narrative and governance.
Transparency and governance
A community that talks openly and governs fairly is a community that lasts. Transparent tokenomics, public development updates, and community-driven initiatives reduce the risk of sudden, trust-eroding surprises. When decisions are discussed in public channels and governance mechanisms (even informal ones) exist, members feel agency — and agency breeds stewardship.
How this changes behaviour and outcomes
When you put the pieces together — fixed supply, scarcity psychology, Solana-speed rails, and a culture that rewards conviction — you get different outcomes:
Lower churn. Fewer people chasing quick flips means fewer panic liquidations.Higher-quality contributors. Builders, content creators, and moderators prefer projects where their work compounds social value rather than amplifies short-term hype.Durable price narrative. Scarcity and community alignment make it easier to tell a consistent story to newcomers and long-timers alike.
For people who are in crypto “for more than noise”
If you’re tired of transient pump narratives and want a project where ownership, culture, and clarity matter, this approach resonates. It’s not a promise of guaranteed returns — nothing is — but it’s a design that encourages people to act like stakeholders rather than spectators.
Closing — a housewarming invite
Memecoins can be fun and chaotic. The rare ones that last balance that chaos with structure and community. Here, the emphasis is clear: conviction over velocity, culture over marketing, ownership over dilution. If you’re in crypto for something that feels like a community rather than a headline, this one aims to feel like home. 🏠

Bitcoin and Ethereum Go Live on STON.fi — Non-custodial BTC & ETH on TON
STON.fi today expands its DeFi offering with the addition of Bitcoin and Ethereum to the TON ecosystem. cbBTC (Bitcoin as a TON-wrapped asset) and wETH (wrapped Ether) are now available on STON.fi in a fully non-custodial format, accessible through USDt pools and routed across TON liquidity via Omniston. This move gives TON dApps and users direct, on-chain access to two of the largest crypto assets without leaving the TON environment.

What’s new
Assets launched: cbBTC (Bitcoin) and wETH (Ethereum) are now tradeable on STON.fi.Format: Both assets are offered in a non-custodial DeFi model, meaning users keep control of their private keys while interacting with liquidity pools and swaps.Liquidity rails: Swaps are executed via USDt pools and routed using Omniston, which aggregates TON liquidity to find efficient swap paths.Where to swap:cbBTC: ston.fi/btc-tonwETH: ston.fi/eth-ton
How it works (simple explanation)
Wrapped assets on TON: cbBTC and wETH are tokenized representations of Bitcoin and Ether that can be moved and used inside the TON blockchain.USDt pools as the backbone: Instead of direct BTC/ETH pools, STON.fi uses USDt pools as common denominators to provide deep liquidity and predictable pricing for swaps.Routing via Omniston: Omniston routes swap orders across TON liquidity sources to find the best path and price — enabling smoother, faster trades for users and integrators.Non-custodial interaction: Users swap, provide liquidity, and receive tokens while retaining control of their keys — STON.fi facilitates the protocol-side exchange and pool mechanics without custody.
Why this matters
Native access to major assets on TON: By bringing Bitcoin and Ethereum into TON’s DeFi layer, STON.fi extends the TON user experience: wallets, dApps, and smart contracts can now work with cbBTC and wETH natively.Better composability for TON apps: dApp developers on TON can build features that interact with BTC and ETH liquidity (lending, farming, cross-asset strategies) without relying on external bridges or custodial solutions.Improved liquidity and UX: USDt pools plus Omniston routing aim to reduce friction and slippage for swaps, making cross-asset transactions more efficient for end users.Non-custodial security model: Users who prioritize control of private keys can interact with BTC and ETH price exposure while staying inside TON’s architecture.
What users should know before swapping
Non-custodial ≠ risk-free: Non-custodial setups mean you control your keys, but smart-contract risk, impermanent loss (if providing liquidity), and network-specific risks still apply.Understand wrapped assets: cbBTC and wETH are tokenized/bridged representations — read the project docs if you want details on minting/redemption and backing mechanics.Check pool parameters: Before providing liquidity or performing large swaps, review pool depth, fees, and slippage settings to avoid unexpected outcomes.Not financial advice: This article is informational. Always do your own research and consider your risk tolerance before trading or providing liquidity.
How to get started (quick steps)
Open a TON-compatible wallet (ensure it supports USDt, cbBTC, and wETH).Visit the STON.fi swap pages:cbBTC on STON.fi: ston.fi/btc-tonwETH on STON.fi: ston.fi/eth-tonConnect your wallet, review the pool or swap details, set acceptable slippage, and confirm transactions.If you plan to provide liquidity, understand impermanent loss and the pool’s fee structure.
Final note
The integration of cbBTC and wETH into STON.fi — routed by Omniston and anchored by USDt pools — strengthens TON’s DeFi utility by making two flagship crypto assets usable inside the ecosystem. For developers and users building on TON, this is a practical step toward broader asset interoperability without giving up a non-custodial model. If you plan to interact with these pools, read the STON.fi documentation and take the usual security precautions.
Start swapping:
cbBTC on STON.fi — ston.fi/btc-ton
WETH on STON.fi — ston.fi/eth-ton
$BTC $ETH $TON

Ecosistema TON DeFi: puntare sulla semplicità invece di incentivi a breve termine
Entro il 2025, la quota di TON nel TVL globale DeFi sarà di circa lo 0,5%. A prima vista, questo è un indicatore modesto. Tuttavia, è più importante non la scala, ma la natura della crescita. A differenza di molti ecosistemi blockchain che attraggono liquidità attraverso programmi di rendimento aggressivi con conseguenti bruschi deflussi di capitale, TON si è sviluppato secondo un modello più strutturato e distribuito.

TON’s different path: simplicity-first growth vs incentive spikes
By 2025, TON accounted for roughly 0.5% of global DeFi TVL — a modest slice on paper, but one that looks qualitatively different when you inspect how that growth happened. Where many blockchains chase short, sharp liquidity inflows through aggressive yield campaigns and token airdrops, TON’s trajectory so far reads like a slow, structural build: distribution mechanics, product decisions that reduce friction, and incremental activation inside an existing social platform.
Distribution over faucet-style growth
Most DeFi ecosystems expand in fits and starts: huge incentives attract capital quickly, and when those incentives stop, capital leaves just as fast. TON’s expansion did not follow that boom-and-bust pattern. Instead, it tracked distribution: tokens and access were pushed into the hands of users already inside Telegram’s ecosystem, and those users were offered a smoother path into on-chain activity.
The difference matters. Incentive-driven campaigns often convert whales and yield-seeking liquidity providers into short-term participants. Distribution-driven growth converts users — people who were already using a product for messaging, communities, or content — into occasional, then habitual, DeFi participants. That pathway tends to produce a stickier user base.
Reducing steps = higher completion rates
Telegram doesn’t automatically turn its 1B+ monthly active users into DeFi users — but it did remove many practical obstacles to trying on-chain actions. Inside Mini Apps, TON Connect emerged as a default wallet bridge: users don’t need to bridge assets, import exotic token lists, or bounce between browser wallets and apps. Those removed steps reduce cognitive load and technical friction.
Small experiments — a first swap, a tiny liquidity deposit, a quick perpetual trade — are the critical moments when a non-crypto user becomes a crypto user. The fewer the clicks and confusing screens, the more likely those experiments happen and the more likely they repeat. TON’s product-first approach leverages exactly that insight: make the first experience easy, and retention can follow.
Infrastructure: bridging the external world in
Product convenience alone isn’t enough; infrastructure must also lower capital entry friction. Integrations such as LayerZero and deployments of stablecoins made moving value into TON less painful. Where previously users might have needed to hop chains and pay bridging fees, improved cross-chain messaging and native-like stablecoin options cut the cost and complexity of entry.
Alongside those plumbing improvements, credible swap venues and emerging perpetual markets created genuine utility — not just a single faucet for yield. That combination helps TON look more like an ecosystem of complementary services rather than a narrow, single-use playground.
Simplicity-driven retention vs. incentive-driven cycles
This is the central strategic question: can simplicity-driven retention outperform the short-term growth numbers produced by incentive spikes? History of digital products suggests it can — but on a different timeline. Incentive campaigns produce headline metrics quickly; product-led activation grows engagement steadily and is more likely to produce repeat users and network effects when done well.
For TON, the tradeoffs are obvious:
Pros of the simplicity approach: higher first-time completion rates, better long-term retention, less exposure to “capital flight” when token emissions end, and an easier onboarding funnel from Telegram’s massive user base.Cons: slower headline growth, smaller short-term liquidity grabs, and the need for continued product polish and market-making to sustain usable markets.
What to watch next
If TON’s strategy will win over time, certain indicators should line up:
Activation funnel metrics: a rising percentage of Telegram users completing their first swap or wallet action inside Mini Apps.Retention cohorts: growth in 7- and 30-day retention for wallets activated via TON Connect versus wallets activated off-platform.Diversity of real activity: an expanding mix of use cases — swaps, lending, perps, stablecoin rails — rather than concentrated TVL in a single protocol.Capital stickiness: lower outflows after promotional periods and higher average user lifetime value driven by repeat micro-activity.
Conclusion
TON’s path through 2025 illustrates a deliberate experiment in building DeFi from product simplicity and distribution inside a social platform, rather than from bursts of incentive-driven liquidity. That path sacrifices speed for structural durability: fewer headline TVL gains today, but the potential for a more stable, repeatable, and broad user base tomorrow. Whether this simplicity-first approach ultimately outperforms the classic incentive cycle depends on execution — product polish, developer ecosystem growth, and whether small, frequent on-chain experiments become a habitual part of many Telegram users’ digital lives.
Read more here: blog.ston.fi/ton-defi-ecosyste...
#USTechFundFlows $TON

Quando tutto si muove in unisono: il tuo portafoglio è davvero diversificato?
Se segui il tuo portafoglio DeFi da tempo, probabilmente hai notato una preoccupante tendenza: indipendentemente dalla composizione — altcoin, stablecoin o nuovi token — nei periodi di forti movimenti, il mercato si comporta come un tutto unico. Questa sensazione di "diversificazione" è fuorviante: molti ticker non equivalgono a molti rischi indipendenti. La vera diversificazione è un insieme di attivi che reagiscono in modo diverso ai cambiamenti delle condizioni.

Quando tutto si muove insieme, il tuo portafoglio è davvero diversificato?
Se hai seguito il tuo portafoglio DeFi a lungo, probabilmente hai notato lo stesso modello inquietante: indipendentemente dai token che possiedi, tutto tende a salire e scendere in sincronia. Un giorno i tuoi altcoin stanno esplodendo; il giorno dopo, la liquidità si esaurisce e l'intero portafoglio viene spazzato via. Sembra diversificazione — possiedi token diversi — ma funzionalmente è solo una scommessa singola ripetuta in diverse vesti.
Una vera diversificazione non riguarda il possedere più cose. Riguarda il possedere cose diverse: beni che reagiscono in modo diverso quando le condizioni cambiano. Questa è l'idea di base dietro l'introduzione di rappresentazioni tokenizzate di azioni e ETF tradizionali in un ambiente DeFi autogestito. Quando il tuo portafoglio contiene beni che rispondono a forze diverse, smetti di essere ostaggio degli sbalzi d'umore di un mercato.

STON: come funzionano davvero il potere, gli incentivi e la gestione su STONFI
$STON non è solo un token DEX. È un livello di proprietà dell'ecosistema STON.fi e la base del suo DAO. Unisce le commissioni di trading, le entrate dal routing Omniston e la gestione a lungo termine in un unico sistema che premia l'impegno, non la speculazione.

STON: Come funzionano realmente Potere, Incentivi e Controllo su STON.fi
STON non è solo un altro token: è il livello di proprietà per l'ecosistema STON.fi. È il meccanismo che collega le commissioni di trading, il reddito del routing Omniston e la governance a lungo termine in un unico sistema che premia l'impegno rispetto alla speculazione. Quel design trasforma il protocollo da un semplice mercato in un'infrastruttura governata: un luogo guidato da persone che mettono tempo e risorse dietro le proprie convinzioni.
L'economia sotto il cofano

Due memecoin, una missione: $GOHOME e Pixu Alpha uniscono le forze per amplificare la comunità e il momentum
In una mossa che mescola la cultura di internet con la finanza decentralizzata, $GOHOME oggi ha annunciato una partnership ufficiale con il progetto memecoin basato su Solana @pixu_alpha. La collaborazione unisce due comunità che condividono più di un semplice gusto per i meme: condividono un manuale costruito su un design incentrato sulla comunità, una forte convinzione e una volontà di abbracciare il caos creativo. Insieme, i team dicono che intendono aumentare l'engagement, espandere la portata tra le catene e iniettare nuova energia in entrambi gli ecosistemi.

Come Omniston Amplifica i Fornitori di Liquidità su TON
Omniston è il layer di aggregazione intelligente di STON.fi che si trova tra i trader e la liquidità su TON. Invece di chiedere ai fornitori di liquidità (LP) di spostare fondi, imparare nuovi strumenti o concentrare la liquidità in un solo posto, Omniston fa lavorare di più l'ecosistema di liquidità esistente - automaticamente, silenziosamente e senza rischio di custodia. Il risultato: migliore efficienza del capitale, più opportunità di commissioni per LP ben posizionati e un mercato più sano per tutti.

Come STONfi Trasforma DeFi su TON in un'Esperienza Umana
La finanza decentralizzata (DeFi) è stata a lungo criticata per soddisfare gli esperti: dashboard complesse, gergo sconosciuto e flussi a più fasi che premiano la pazienza e la conoscenza tecnica. STONfi segue una strada diversa. Costruito nativamente su TON e incorporato direttamente in Telegram, STONfi tratta gli utenti come esseri umani prima — e trader in secondo luogo. Il risultato è una piattaforma che rimuove l'attrito, riduce il carico cognitivo e rende il crypto quotidiano familiare come qualsiasi moderna app fintech.

Come STONfi trasforma DeFi in un'esperienza digitale familiare
I protocolli finanziari decentralizzati hanno creato strumenti potenti: maker di mercato automatici, mercati di credito, strategie di rendimento e meccanismi compositivi. Ma il principale ostacolo all'adozione di massa non è più nella tecnologia: è nelle frizioni. Troppi prodotti continuano a richiedere all'utente conoscenze specialistiche, interazioni complesse e tolleranza per interfacce poco trasparenti. STONfi cambia questo approccio, progettando DeFi attorno al comportamento familiare degli utenti, e non attorno alle aspettative dei "specialisti cripto".