Aeriez
53 Post
Aeriez
Segnala
Blocca utente
Altcoin and memecoins hunter
3 Seguiti
13 Follower
30 Mi piace
Post
·
--
Visualizza traduzione
Crypto Tokens With Real Revenue: How Fee Sharing Differs From EmissionsMost token reward programs are not funded by revenue. They are funded by supply expansion: the protocol mints new tokens, distributes them as rewards, and calls it yield. The distinction matters because those two funding sources have opposite effects on token supply over time.
Emissions vs revenue: where token rewards actually come from
Crypto tokens with real revenue are a specific subset of the broader reward-token category. To qualify, distributed assets must originate from fees users paid for a service, not from newly created supply. An emissions model works the opposite way: the protocol schedules a supply release, tokens go to stakers or holders, and the reward pool shrinks as supply depletes or dilutes holders as it expands. The critical question: where does the distributed asset actually come from? If the answer is "we mint it," the model is emissions. If the answer is "users pay fees and a portion goes to you," the model is revenue-funded. A secondary question: is the distributed asset bought back from the open market, or newly created? Buybacks create real demand at distribution time. New issuance creates supply pressure. $BANANA, the token behind Banana Gun, distributes rewards purchased from the open market using real trading fee revenue, not minted from a new issuance pool. The fee base: $16 billion+ in cumulative trading volume. Full mechanics at dashboard.bananagun.io.
How fee-funded models work
A fee-funded distribution requires a product that generates fees from real usage. The protocol collects those fees, retains a portion for operations, and routes the remainder to token holders on a scheduled basis. The health of the reward pool is tied directly to product usage: more volume means a larger distribution pool. Less activity means a smaller one.
This creates a different holder relationship than emissions. In an emissions model, you can calculate expected rewards from a supply schedule without knowing anything about product usage. In a fee-funded model, you hold a stake in the fee income of an underlying business. If the product stops being used, the reward pool dries up. If the product grows, so does the pool.
Some protocols generating real trading fees have been cited as examples of this model. HYPE, associated with the Hyperliquid spot and perps ecosystem, is widely discussed in the DEX category for its approach to fee-generated distributions. GMX, a decentralized exchange with documented fee-sharing mechanics for its token holders, has been analyzed extensively by on-chain researchers. Both are worth reviewing in their own documentation for how they structure distributions, as their mechanics differ from each other and from spot trading bot models.
How the $BANANA fee share works mechanically
$BANANA distributes 40% of Banana Gun bot trading fees (after referrals) to qualifying holders every four hours, six distribution windows per day. Minimum to qualify: 50 $BANANA held in a non-custodial wallet at snapshot time.
The gasless claim threshold is 0.1 ETH or 0.1 SOL in accrued rewards. On EVM chains, you claim in ETH or $BANANA. On Solana, the claim currency is SOL only.
Two epoch rules govern the mechanic. Selling or transferring more than 300 $BANANA during an active epoch forfeits your rewards for that epoch, with forfeited rewards redistributing to remaining qualifying holders. Dropping below 50 $BANANA triggers the same forfeiture. The buy/sell/transfer tax on $BANANA is 0%, and all distributed $BANANA is purchased from the open market using fee revenue, not minted.
Buybacks versus new issuance
A buyback-funded distribution requires the protocol to purchase the distributed asset on the open market before sending it to holders. Each distribution event is a buy order at market price. For a token with a fixed supply, that cadence of market purchases has a directional effect on available float.
New issuance works the opposite way. The protocol creates the distribution amount from treasury or via minting and sends it to holders, who can sell immediately. The secondary market effect is the inverse: distribution events introduce new supply rather than buying existing supply.
Whether new issuance is positive or negative depends on whether demand growth offsets the new supply, which is harder to guarantee than a mechanical buyback schedule. $BANANA has a fixed total supply of 10,000,000, with 1,100,000 permanently burned. Circulating supply sits at approximately 3,220,000 tokens. There is no minting mechanism in the distribution path.
Reading a revenue model before you believe it
Before accepting any "real yield" or fee-sharing claim, check primary source documentation for four things.
What is the fee source? Identify the product users pay to use and verify the fee rate. A trading bot, a DEX, and a lending protocol all generate fees differently, and the sustainability of each differs significantly.
What percentage goes to token holders, and is that percentage fixed or governance-dependent? Fixed mechanics are easier to model than those that can change by vote.
Is the distributed asset bought back or newly issued? Check the token supply chart around distribution events. A buyback shows up as buy-side volume. New issuance shows up as circulating supply expansion.
What are the holding requirements and forfeiture conditions? Some models require lockup. Others, like $BANANA, require only a minimum balance with no lockup but include epoch-level rules around selling. Understanding those rules before holding determines whether the theoretical distribution actually reaches your wallet.
#BananaGun #BANANA #RealYield #Tokenomics #DeFi #FeeSharing #CryptoRevenue #Web3 #OnChainTrading
Crypto Tokens With Real Revenue: How Fee Sharing Differs From Emissions
Most token reward programs are not funded by revenue. They are funded by supply expansion: the protocol mints new tokens, distributes them as rewards, and calls it yield. The distinction matters because those two funding sources have opposite effects on token supply over time.
Emissions vs revenue: where token rewards actually come from
Crypto tokens with real revenue are a specific subset of the broader reward-token category. To qualify, distributed assets must originate from fees users paid for a service, not from newly created supply. An emissions model works the opposite way: the protocol schedules a supply release, tokens go to stakers or holders, and the reward pool shrinks as supply depletes or dilutes holders as it expands. The critical question: where does the distributed asset actually come from? If the answer is "we mint it," the model is emissions. If the answer is "users pay fees and a portion goes to you," the model is revenue-funded. A secondary question: is the distributed asset bought back from the open market, or newly created? Buybacks create real demand at distribution time. New issuance creates supply pressure. $BANANA, the token behind Banana Gun, distributes rewards purchased from the open market using real trading fee revenue, not minted from a new issuance pool. The fee base: $16 billion+ in cumulative trading volume. Full mechanics at dashboard.bananagun.io.
How fee-funded models work
A fee-funded distribution requires a product that generates fees from real usage. The protocol collects those fees, retains a portion for operations, and routes the remainder to token holders on a scheduled basis. The health of the reward pool is tied directly to product usage: more volume means a larger distribution pool. Less activity means a smaller one.
This creates a different holder relationship than emissions. In an emissions model, you can calculate expected rewards from a supply schedule without knowing anything about product usage. In a fee-funded model, you hold a stake in the fee income of an underlying business. If the product stops being used, the reward pool dries up. If the product grows, so does the pool.
Some protocols generating real trading fees have been cited as examples of this model. HYPE, associated with the Hyperliquid spot and perps ecosystem, is widely discussed in the DEX category for its approach to fee-generated distributions. GMX, a decentralized exchange with documented fee-sharing mechanics for its token holders, has been analyzed extensively by on-chain researchers. Both are worth reviewing in their own documentation for how they structure distributions, as their mechanics differ from each other and from spot trading bot models.
How the $BANANA fee share works mechanically
$BANANA distributes 40% of Banana Gun bot trading fees (after referrals) to qualifying holders every four hours, six distribution windows per day. Minimum to qualify: 50 $BANANA held in a non-custodial wallet at snapshot time.
The gasless claim threshold is 0.1 ETH or 0.1 SOL in accrued rewards. On EVM chains, you claim in ETH or $BANANA. On Solana, the claim currency is SOL only.
Two epoch rules govern the mechanic. Selling or transferring more than 300 $BANANA during an active epoch forfeits your rewards for that epoch, with forfeited rewards redistributing to remaining qualifying holders. Dropping below 50 $BANANA triggers the same forfeiture. The buy/sell/transfer tax on $BANANA is 0%, and all distributed $BANANA is purchased from the open market using fee revenue, not minted.
Buybacks versus new issuance
A buyback-funded distribution requires the protocol to purchase the distributed asset on the open market before sending it to holders. Each distribution event is a buy order at market price. For a token with a fixed supply, that cadence of market purchases has a directional effect on available float.
New issuance works the opposite way. The protocol creates the distribution amount from treasury or via minting and sends it to holders, who can sell immediately. The secondary market effect is the inverse: distribution events introduce new supply rather than buying existing supply.
Whether new issuance is positive or negative depends on whether demand growth offsets the new supply, which is harder to guarantee than a mechanical buyback schedule. $BANANA has a fixed total supply of 10,000,000, with 1,100,000 permanently burned. Circulating supply sits at approximately 3,220,000 tokens. There is no minting mechanism in the distribution path.
Reading a revenue model before you believe it
Before accepting any "real yield" or fee-sharing claim, check primary source documentation for four things.
What is the fee source? Identify the product users pay to use and verify the fee rate. A trading bot, a DEX, and a lending protocol all generate fees differently, and the sustainability of each differs significantly.
What percentage goes to token holders, and is that percentage fixed or governance-dependent? Fixed mechanics are easier to model than those that can change by vote.
Is the distributed asset bought back or newly issued? Check the token supply chart around distribution events. A buyback shows up as buy-side volume. New issuance shows up as circulating supply expansion.
What are the holding requirements and forfeiture conditions? Some models require lockup. Others, like $BANANA, require only a minimum balance with no lockup but include epoch-level rules around selling. Understanding those rules before holding determines whether the theoretical distribution actually reaches your wallet.
#BananaGun #BANANA #RealYield #Tokenomics #DeFi #FeeSharing #CryptoRevenue #Web3 #OnChainTrading
Emissions vs revenue: where token rewards actually come from
Crypto tokens with real revenue are a specific subset of the broader reward-token category. To qualify, distributed assets must originate from fees users paid for a service, not from newly created supply. An emissions model works the opposite way: the protocol schedules a supply release, tokens go to stakers or holders, and the reward pool shrinks as supply depletes or dilutes holders as it expands. The critical question: where does the distributed asset actually come from? If the answer is "we mint it," the model is emissions. If the answer is "users pay fees and a portion goes to you," the model is revenue-funded. A secondary question: is the distributed asset bought back from the open market, or newly created? Buybacks create real demand at distribution time. New issuance creates supply pressure. $BANANA, the token behind Banana Gun, distributes rewards purchased from the open market using real trading fee revenue, not minted from a new issuance pool. The fee base: $16 billion+ in cumulative trading volume. Full mechanics at dashboard.bananagun.io.
How fee-funded models work
A fee-funded distribution requires a product that generates fees from real usage. The protocol collects those fees, retains a portion for operations, and routes the remainder to token holders on a scheduled basis. The health of the reward pool is tied directly to product usage: more volume means a larger distribution pool. Less activity means a smaller one.
This creates a different holder relationship than emissions. In an emissions model, you can calculate expected rewards from a supply schedule without knowing anything about product usage. In a fee-funded model, you hold a stake in the fee income of an underlying business. If the product stops being used, the reward pool dries up. If the product grows, so does the pool.
Some protocols generating real trading fees have been cited as examples of this model. HYPE, associated with the Hyperliquid spot and perps ecosystem, is widely discussed in the DEX category for its approach to fee-generated distributions. GMX, a decentralized exchange with documented fee-sharing mechanics for its token holders, has been analyzed extensively by on-chain researchers. Both are worth reviewing in their own documentation for how they structure distributions, as their mechanics differ from each other and from spot trading bot models.
How the $BANANA fee share works mechanically
$BANANA distributes 40% of Banana Gun bot trading fees (after referrals) to qualifying holders every four hours, six distribution windows per day. Minimum to qualify: 50 $BANANA held in a non-custodial wallet at snapshot time.
The gasless claim threshold is 0.1 ETH or 0.1 SOL in accrued rewards. On EVM chains, you claim in ETH or $BANANA. On Solana, the claim currency is SOL only.
Two epoch rules govern the mechanic. Selling or transferring more than 300 $BANANA during an active epoch forfeits your rewards for that epoch, with forfeited rewards redistributing to remaining qualifying holders. Dropping below 50 $BANANA triggers the same forfeiture. The buy/sell/transfer tax on $BANANA is 0%, and all distributed $BANANA is purchased from the open market using fee revenue, not minted.
Buybacks versus new issuance
A buyback-funded distribution requires the protocol to purchase the distributed asset on the open market before sending it to holders. Each distribution event is a buy order at market price. For a token with a fixed supply, that cadence of market purchases has a directional effect on available float.
New issuance works the opposite way. The protocol creates the distribution amount from treasury or via minting and sends it to holders, who can sell immediately. The secondary market effect is the inverse: distribution events introduce new supply rather than buying existing supply.
Whether new issuance is positive or negative depends on whether demand growth offsets the new supply, which is harder to guarantee than a mechanical buyback schedule. $BANANA has a fixed total supply of 10,000,000, with 1,100,000 permanently burned. Circulating supply sits at approximately 3,220,000 tokens. There is no minting mechanism in the distribution path.
Reading a revenue model before you believe it
Before accepting any "real yield" or fee-sharing claim, check primary source documentation for four things.
What is the fee source? Identify the product users pay to use and verify the fee rate. A trading bot, a DEX, and a lending protocol all generate fees differently, and the sustainability of each differs significantly.
What percentage goes to token holders, and is that percentage fixed or governance-dependent? Fixed mechanics are easier to model than those that can change by vote.
Is the distributed asset bought back or newly issued? Check the token supply chart around distribution events. A buyback shows up as buy-side volume. New issuance shows up as circulating supply expansion.
What are the holding requirements and forfeiture conditions? Some models require lockup. Others, like $BANANA, require only a minimum balance with no lockup but include epoch-level rules around selling. Understanding those rules before holding determines whether the theoretical distribution actually reaches your wallet.
#BananaGun #BANANA #RealYield #Tokenomics #DeFi #FeeSharing #CryptoRevenue #Web3 #OnChainTrading
199
·
--
Rialzista
Visualizza traduzione
THIS IS CRAZY.
$SYN JUST ERASED 413 DAYS OF DOWNTREND IN A FEW CANDLES.
Over a year of pain, chopped holders, dead chart, no hype…
Then boom.
This is why crypto is brutal if you panic sell the bottom.
Sometimes the whole move happens after everyone gives up.
HODL only makes sense when the thesis is still alive.
THIS IS CRAZY.
$SYN JUST ERASED 413 DAYS OF DOWNTREND IN A FEW CANDLES.
Over a year of pain, chopped holders, dead chart, no hype…
Then boom.
This is why crypto is brutal if you panic sell the bottom.
Sometimes the whole move happens after everyone gives up.
HODL only makes sense when the thesis is still alive.
$SYN JUST ERASED 413 DAYS OF DOWNTREND IN A FEW CANDLES.
Over a year of pain, chopped holders, dead chart, no hype…
Then boom.
This is why crypto is brutal if you panic sell the bottom.
Sometimes the whole move happens after everyone gives up.
HODL only makes sense when the thesis is still alive.
1
277
·
--
Rialzista
Visualizza traduzione
Positioning on $BANANA here with 5x max.
Not going crazy size, but this setup looks clean if $2.82-$2.85 keeps holding.
Entry: $2.83-$2.86
Stop loss: below $2.76
Targets: $2.95 → $3.03 → $3.15
From entry to $3.15 is around 10.4% spot move.
On 5x, that’s roughly 52% upside before fees.
Lose $2.76 and I’m out.
No hero trading.
Just clean risk/reward on $BANANA.
Positioning on $BANANA here with 5x max.
Not going crazy size, but this setup looks clean if $2.82-$2.85 keeps holding.
Entry: $2.83-$2.86
Stop loss: below $2.76
Targets: $2.95 → $3.03 → $3.15
From entry to $3.15 is around 10.4% spot move.
On 5x, that’s roughly 52% upside before fees.
Lose $2.76 and I’m out.
No hero trading.
Just clean risk/reward on $BANANA.
Not going crazy size, but this setup looks clean if $2.82-$2.85 keeps holding.
Entry: $2.83-$2.86
Stop loss: below $2.76
Targets: $2.95 → $3.03 → $3.15
From entry to $3.15 is around 10.4% spot move.
On 5x, that’s roughly 52% upside before fees.
Lose $2.76 and I’m out.
No hero trading.
Just clean risk/reward on $BANANA.
1
430
·
--
Rialzista
Visualizza traduzione
Who’s waiting for the $BEAT buy zone?
After that crazy run, it finally cooled off hard.
not chasing this at the top, but if it comes back into the $0.75-$0.95 zone, that’s where it gets interesting.
Real runners usually give one nasty pullback before the next leg.
Who’s waiting for the $BEAT buy zone?
After that crazy run, it finally cooled off hard.
not chasing this at the top, but if it comes back into the $0.75-$0.95 zone, that’s where it gets interesting.
Real runners usually give one nasty pullback before the next leg.
After that crazy run, it finally cooled off hard.
not chasing this at the top, but if it comes back into the $0.75-$0.95 zone, that’s where it gets interesting.
Real runners usually give one nasty pullback before the next leg.
260
·
--
Rialzista
Visualizza traduzione
$SYN JUST PRINTED A 470% CANDLE AND PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE THIS IS NORMAL.
Bottom buyers are eating crazy.
A $1M entry near the lows would be worth around $5.7M if you caught the full move.
Normal pump or manipulation?
Will it keep sending?
$SYN JUST PRINTED A 470% CANDLE AND PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE THIS IS NORMAL.
Bottom buyers are eating crazy.
A $1M entry near the lows would be worth around $5.7M if you caught the full move.
Normal pump or manipulation?
Will it keep sending?
Bottom buyers are eating crazy.
A $1M entry near the lows would be worth around $5.7M if you caught the full move.
Normal pump or manipulation?
Will it keep sending?
115
·
--
Ribassista
Visualizza traduzione
THIS IS BEARISH FOR BITCOIN $BTC
Fed pushing KYC on stablecoin issuers is the same old system trying to crawl onchain.
Blockchain was built for open, permissionless money, not TradFi checkpoints with nicer branding.
Decentralization is the whole point.
THIS IS BEARISH FOR BITCOIN $BTC
Fed pushing KYC on stablecoin issuers is the same old system trying to crawl onchain.
Blockchain was built for open, permissionless money, not TradFi checkpoints with nicer branding.
Decentralization is the whole point.
Fed pushing KYC on stablecoin issuers is the same old system trying to crawl onchain.
Blockchain was built for open, permissionless money, not TradFi checkpoints with nicer branding.
Decentralization is the whole point.
34
·
--
Rialzista
CHI HA COMPRATO $ESPORTS PRIMA DI QUESTO PUMP?
Questo asset è salito di circa il 150% dai minimi e continua a mantenersi vicino ai massimi.
Il grafico è passato da morto a verticale in un attimo.
Chi ha preso questo movimento?
CHI HA COMPRATO $ESPORTS PRIMA DI QUESTO PUMP?
Questo asset è salito di circa il 150% dai minimi e continua a mantenersi vicino ai massimi.
Il grafico è passato da morto a verticale in un attimo.
Chi ha preso questo movimento?
Questo asset è salito di circa il 150% dai minimi e continua a mantenersi vicino ai massimi.
Il grafico è passato da morto a verticale in un attimo.
Chi ha preso questo movimento?
492
·
--
Visualizza traduzione
Best Telegram Trading Bots in 2026: Banana Gun vs Trojan vs Maestro vs BonkBotThe best Telegram trading bot in 2026 depends on one question: how many chains do you trade, and do you want a single session to handle all of them? Most bots in this category started on one chain and layered on others later. That layering tends to show in the UX. Banana Gun took the opposite approach and rebuilt for a unified five-chain experience with its March 2026 update, which changes what the daily workflow actually feels like for cross-chain traders.
What a Telegram trading bot actually does
A Telegram trading bot executes on-chain token trades from a Telegram chat interface without requiring a browser wallet, DEX UI, or MetaMask extension. You tap buttons inside a chat session and the bot handles transaction construction, gas estimation, routing, and execution. Core use cases are manual buys, limit orders, and sniping, where the bot fires a buy in the same block as a liquidity event. More capable bots add copy trading, wallet tracking, and sell simulation. The criteria that separate strong bots from weak ones: execution reliability across chain conditions, fee structure, custody model, and whether the platform shares revenue with token holders. Banana Gun has processed over $16 billion in cumulative trading volume, 1.2 million+ registered users, and 25.3 million+ lifetime trades, giving its routing engine a real-world stress-test dataset few competitors can match. The unified bot at t.me/BananaGun_bot covers all five supported chains in one session.
Trojan, Maestro, and BonkBot: where each one fits
Trojan is Solana-focused and has built a reputation for fast execution on that chain. Its snipe tooling is well-regarded among Solana-native traders and the interface is clean for single-chain workflows. The limitation is the same as its strength: if you trade EVM chains, Trojan is not the right primary tool.
Maestro is one of the older multi-chain bots and covers a broad range of networks. It does not have a fee-sharing token, so the revenue model is one-directional. The multi-chain coverage is real, but tooling depth varies across networks.
BonkBot serves the Solana and BONK community with a lighter tool designed for quick execution inside that ecosystem. Scope is narrow by design, which makes it a poor fit for anyone trading across EVM chains.
All three bots serve their audiences. The trade-off in each case is coverage versus depth: narrower chain focus makes the product easier to optimize for that chain, at the cost of versatility.
Banana Gun: five chains in one Telegram session
The March 2026 unified bot launch put ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base, and MegaETH in a single Telegram session. Before that, EVM and Solana required separate sessions. Position management, wallet tracking, and copy trade activity across chains no longer require context-switching between different sessions.
The bot syncs bidirectionally with Banana Pro, Banana Gun's web trading terminal at pro.bananagun.io. Positions opened through the bot appear in the terminal and vice versa.
Sniping on Ethereum reaches an 88% first-block success rate, per the Banana Gun blog. On Solana, the bot routes through Jito infrastructure when MEV Protection is toggled on, which is an optional setting rather than a forced default. Solana sniping covers five DEXes: Raydium AMM, Raydium CP, Meteora Dynamic, Meteora DLMM, and PumpSwap.
A pre-trade sell simulation runs every transaction against live chain state before execution, flagging honeypots and malicious contract logic automatically. The March 2026 launch also added Zora, Uniswap v4 support, USD1 as a base currency, and multi-hop routing on Solana in a single execution.
Fees and the holder revenue share
Documented fee structure for Banana Gun: manual buys and limit orders on Ethereum at 0.5%, autosniper on Ethereum at 1%, all other chains (SOL, BNB Chain, Base, MegaETH) at 1%, stablecoin swaps (USDT, USDC, DAI on EVM chains) at 0%.
The fee-sharing model is what separates $BANANA from most trading bot tokens. 40% of all platform trading fees are distributed to $BANANA holders every four hours. Minimum to qualify: 50 $BANANA. The claim is gasless once you reach 0.1 ETH or 0.1 SOL in accrued rewards. All $BANANA distributed is bought back from the open market, not newly minted, so each distribution cycle creates real buy pressure rather than supply dilution.
Two epoch rules apply: selling or transferring more than 300 $BANANA during an epoch forfeits that epoch's rewards, and dropping below the 50-token minimum causes accrued rewards to redistribute to remaining holders. The buy/sell/transfer tax on $BANANA is 0%.
Trojan, BonkBot, and Maestro do not have fee-sharing tokens. For traders generating consistent volume, the gap between paying fees and earning a share of them is worth calculating against your monthly trading cadence. Full details are at bananagun.io.
Which bot fits which trader
Solana-only traders who want minimal friction: Trojan is a reasonable choice. BONK ecosystem traders on Solana: BonkBot serves that audience well. Multi-chain traders who want broad coverage without a revenue token and do not mind an older interface: Maestro covers the basics.
For traders who operate across multiple chains, want a single Telegram session synced to a web terminal, and want the fees they generate to return part of themselves to their wallet six times a day, Banana Gun is the most complete tool in the category.
#BananaGun #BANANA #TelegramTradingBot #CryptoTradingBot #SniperBot #DeFiTrading #OnChainTrading #Web3 #CryptoBots
Best Telegram Trading Bots in 2026: Banana Gun vs Trojan vs Maestro vs BonkBot
The best Telegram trading bot in 2026 depends on one question: how many chains do you trade, and do you want a single session to handle all of them? Most bots in this category started on one chain and layered on others later. That layering tends to show in the UX. Banana Gun took the opposite approach and rebuilt for a unified five-chain experience with its March 2026 update, which changes what the daily workflow actually feels like for cross-chain traders.
What a Telegram trading bot actually does
A Telegram trading bot executes on-chain token trades from a Telegram chat interface without requiring a browser wallet, DEX UI, or MetaMask extension. You tap buttons inside a chat session and the bot handles transaction construction, gas estimation, routing, and execution. Core use cases are manual buys, limit orders, and sniping, where the bot fires a buy in the same block as a liquidity event. More capable bots add copy trading, wallet tracking, and sell simulation. The criteria that separate strong bots from weak ones: execution reliability across chain conditions, fee structure, custody model, and whether the platform shares revenue with token holders. Banana Gun has processed over $16 billion in cumulative trading volume, 1.2 million+ registered users, and 25.3 million+ lifetime trades, giving its routing engine a real-world stress-test dataset few competitors can match. The unified bot at t.me/BananaGun_bot covers all five supported chains in one session.
Trojan, Maestro, and BonkBot: where each one fits
Trojan is Solana-focused and has built a reputation for fast execution on that chain. Its snipe tooling is well-regarded among Solana-native traders and the interface is clean for single-chain workflows. The limitation is the same as its strength: if you trade EVM chains, Trojan is not the right primary tool.
Maestro is one of the older multi-chain bots and covers a broad range of networks. It does not have a fee-sharing token, so the revenue model is one-directional. The multi-chain coverage is real, but tooling depth varies across networks.
BonkBot serves the Solana and BONK community with a lighter tool designed for quick execution inside that ecosystem. Scope is narrow by design, which makes it a poor fit for anyone trading across EVM chains.
All three bots serve their audiences. The trade-off in each case is coverage versus depth: narrower chain focus makes the product easier to optimize for that chain, at the cost of versatility.
Banana Gun: five chains in one Telegram session
The March 2026 unified bot launch put ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base, and MegaETH in a single Telegram session. Before that, EVM and Solana required separate sessions. Position management, wallet tracking, and copy trade activity across chains no longer require context-switching between different sessions.
The bot syncs bidirectionally with Banana Pro, Banana Gun's web trading terminal at pro.bananagun.io. Positions opened through the bot appear in the terminal and vice versa.
Sniping on Ethereum reaches an 88% first-block success rate, per the Banana Gun blog. On Solana, the bot routes through Jito infrastructure when MEV Protection is toggled on, which is an optional setting rather than a forced default. Solana sniping covers five DEXes: Raydium AMM, Raydium CP, Meteora Dynamic, Meteora DLMM, and PumpSwap.
A pre-trade sell simulation runs every transaction against live chain state before execution, flagging honeypots and malicious contract logic automatically. The March 2026 launch also added Zora, Uniswap v4 support, USD1 as a base currency, and multi-hop routing on Solana in a single execution.
Fees and the holder revenue share
Documented fee structure for Banana Gun: manual buys and limit orders on Ethereum at 0.5%, autosniper on Ethereum at 1%, all other chains (SOL, BNB Chain, Base, MegaETH) at 1%, stablecoin swaps (USDT, USDC, DAI on EVM chains) at 0%.
The fee-sharing model is what separates $BANANA from most trading bot tokens. 40% of all platform trading fees are distributed to $BANANA holders every four hours. Minimum to qualify: 50 $BANANA. The claim is gasless once you reach 0.1 ETH or 0.1 SOL in accrued rewards. All $BANANA distributed is bought back from the open market, not newly minted, so each distribution cycle creates real buy pressure rather than supply dilution.
Two epoch rules apply: selling or transferring more than 300 $BANANA during an epoch forfeits that epoch's rewards, and dropping below the 50-token minimum causes accrued rewards to redistribute to remaining holders. The buy/sell/transfer tax on $BANANA is 0%.
Trojan, BonkBot, and Maestro do not have fee-sharing tokens. For traders generating consistent volume, the gap between paying fees and earning a share of them is worth calculating against your monthly trading cadence. Full details are at bananagun.io.
Which bot fits which trader
Solana-only traders who want minimal friction: Trojan is a reasonable choice. BONK ecosystem traders on Solana: BonkBot serves that audience well. Multi-chain traders who want broad coverage without a revenue token and do not mind an older interface: Maestro covers the basics.
For traders who operate across multiple chains, want a single Telegram session synced to a web terminal, and want the fees they generate to return part of themselves to their wallet six times a day, Banana Gun is the most complete tool in the category.
#BananaGun #BANANA #TelegramTradingBot #CryptoTradingBot #SniperBot #DeFiTrading #OnChainTrading #Web3 #CryptoBots
What a Telegram trading bot actually does
A Telegram trading bot executes on-chain token trades from a Telegram chat interface without requiring a browser wallet, DEX UI, or MetaMask extension. You tap buttons inside a chat session and the bot handles transaction construction, gas estimation, routing, and execution. Core use cases are manual buys, limit orders, and sniping, where the bot fires a buy in the same block as a liquidity event. More capable bots add copy trading, wallet tracking, and sell simulation. The criteria that separate strong bots from weak ones: execution reliability across chain conditions, fee structure, custody model, and whether the platform shares revenue with token holders. Banana Gun has processed over $16 billion in cumulative trading volume, 1.2 million+ registered users, and 25.3 million+ lifetime trades, giving its routing engine a real-world stress-test dataset few competitors can match. The unified bot at t.me/BananaGun_bot covers all five supported chains in one session.
Trojan, Maestro, and BonkBot: where each one fits
Trojan is Solana-focused and has built a reputation for fast execution on that chain. Its snipe tooling is well-regarded among Solana-native traders and the interface is clean for single-chain workflows. The limitation is the same as its strength: if you trade EVM chains, Trojan is not the right primary tool.
Maestro is one of the older multi-chain bots and covers a broad range of networks. It does not have a fee-sharing token, so the revenue model is one-directional. The multi-chain coverage is real, but tooling depth varies across networks.
BonkBot serves the Solana and BONK community with a lighter tool designed for quick execution inside that ecosystem. Scope is narrow by design, which makes it a poor fit for anyone trading across EVM chains.
All three bots serve their audiences. The trade-off in each case is coverage versus depth: narrower chain focus makes the product easier to optimize for that chain, at the cost of versatility.
Banana Gun: five chains in one Telegram session
The March 2026 unified bot launch put ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base, and MegaETH in a single Telegram session. Before that, EVM and Solana required separate sessions. Position management, wallet tracking, and copy trade activity across chains no longer require context-switching between different sessions.
The bot syncs bidirectionally with Banana Pro, Banana Gun's web trading terminal at pro.bananagun.io. Positions opened through the bot appear in the terminal and vice versa.
Sniping on Ethereum reaches an 88% first-block success rate, per the Banana Gun blog. On Solana, the bot routes through Jito infrastructure when MEV Protection is toggled on, which is an optional setting rather than a forced default. Solana sniping covers five DEXes: Raydium AMM, Raydium CP, Meteora Dynamic, Meteora DLMM, and PumpSwap.
A pre-trade sell simulation runs every transaction against live chain state before execution, flagging honeypots and malicious contract logic automatically. The March 2026 launch also added Zora, Uniswap v4 support, USD1 as a base currency, and multi-hop routing on Solana in a single execution.
Fees and the holder revenue share
Documented fee structure for Banana Gun: manual buys and limit orders on Ethereum at 0.5%, autosniper on Ethereum at 1%, all other chains (SOL, BNB Chain, Base, MegaETH) at 1%, stablecoin swaps (USDT, USDC, DAI on EVM chains) at 0%.
The fee-sharing model is what separates $BANANA from most trading bot tokens. 40% of all platform trading fees are distributed to $BANANA holders every four hours. Minimum to qualify: 50 $BANANA. The claim is gasless once you reach 0.1 ETH or 0.1 SOL in accrued rewards. All $BANANA distributed is bought back from the open market, not newly minted, so each distribution cycle creates real buy pressure rather than supply dilution.
Two epoch rules apply: selling or transferring more than 300 $BANANA during an epoch forfeits that epoch's rewards, and dropping below the 50-token minimum causes accrued rewards to redistribute to remaining holders. The buy/sell/transfer tax on $BANANA is 0%.
Trojan, BonkBot, and Maestro do not have fee-sharing tokens. For traders generating consistent volume, the gap between paying fees and earning a share of them is worth calculating against your monthly trading cadence. Full details are at bananagun.io.
Which bot fits which trader
Solana-only traders who want minimal friction: Trojan is a reasonable choice. BONK ecosystem traders on Solana: BonkBot serves that audience well. Multi-chain traders who want broad coverage without a revenue token and do not mind an older interface: Maestro covers the basics.
For traders who operate across multiple chains, want a single Telegram session synced to a web terminal, and want the fees they generate to return part of themselves to their wallet six times a day, Banana Gun is the most complete tool in the category.
#BananaGun #BANANA #TelegramTradingBot #CryptoTradingBot #SniperBot #DeFiTrading #OnChainTrading #Web3 #CryptoBots
219
·
--
Rialzista
IL SETTORE AI HA SUPERATO TUTTO.
La performance del settore negli ultimi 7 giorni lo dice chiaramente.
L'AI sta guidando mentre BTC, ETH, DeFi, L2 e meme stanno ancora cercando di recuperare.
Di solito, è così che inizia la prossima narrativa prima che CT ruoti completamente.
Sto tenendo d'occhio i coin AI da vicino qui.
IL SETTORE AI HA SUPERATO TUTTO.
La performance del settore negli ultimi 7 giorni lo dice chiaramente.
L'AI sta guidando mentre BTC, ETH, DeFi, L2 e meme stanno ancora cercando di recuperare.
Di solito, è così che inizia la prossima narrativa prima che CT ruoti completamente.
Sto tenendo d'occhio i coin AI da vicino qui.
La performance del settore negli ultimi 7 giorni lo dice chiaramente.
L'AI sta guidando mentre BTC, ETH, DeFi, L2 e meme stanno ancora cercando di recuperare.
Di solito, è così che inizia la prossima narrativa prima che CT ruoti completamente.
Sto tenendo d'occhio i coin AI da vicino qui.
23
·
--
Rialzista
HO VISTO QUESTO GIOCO $OGDOGE SU BANANA GUN PRIMA CHE FOSSE PAZZESCO.
$1,000 vicino ai minimi varrebbero circa $55,000 adesso.
Ecco perché la gente non abbandona mai le trincee di Solana.
È quasi tempo di Memecoin?
HO VISTO QUESTO GIOCO $OGDOGE SU BANANA GUN PRIMA CHE FOSSE PAZZESCO.
$1,000 vicino ai minimi varrebbero circa $55,000 adesso.
Ecco perché la gente non abbandona mai le trincee di Solana.
È quasi tempo di Memecoin?
$1,000 vicino ai minimi varrebbero circa $55,000 adesso.
Ecco perché la gente non abbandona mai le trincee di Solana.
È quasi tempo di Memecoin?
32
·
--
Rialzista
È FINALMENTE ARRIVATA LA STAGIONE DEGLI ALTCOIN?
L'Indice della Stagione degli Altcoin è attualmente a 52.
Non siamo ancora nella mania totale, ma il cambiamento sta iniziando.
Di solito è in questa zona che la gente ignora gli alts... per poi inseguirli 3 volte più in alto.
Sto tenendo d'occhio $ETH , $BANANA e $XRP qui.
Chi è posizionato?
È FINALMENTE ARRIVATA LA STAGIONE DEGLI ALTCOIN?
L'Indice della Stagione degli Altcoin è attualmente a 52.
Non siamo ancora nella mania totale, ma il cambiamento sta iniziando.
Di solito è in questa zona che la gente ignora gli alts... per poi inseguirli 3 volte più in alto.
Sto tenendo d'occhio $ETH , $BANANA e $XRP qui.
Chi è posizionato?
L'Indice della Stagione degli Altcoin è attualmente a 52.
Non siamo ancora nella mania totale, ma il cambiamento sta iniziando.
Di solito è in questa zona che la gente ignora gli alts... per poi inseguirli 3 volte più in alto.
Sto tenendo d'occhio $ETH , $BANANA e $XRP qui.
Chi è posizionato?
223
·
--
Token Crypto Con Entrate Reali: Come La Condivisione Delle Commissioni Differisce Dalle EmissioniLa maggior parte dei programmi di ricompensa in token non è finanziata da entrate. Sono finanziati dall'espansione dell'offerta: il protocollo conia nuovi token, li distribuisce come ricompense e lo chiama rendimento. La distinzione è importante perché queste due fonti di finanziamento hanno effetti opposti sull'offerta di token nel tempo.
Emissioni vs entrate: da dove provengono realmente le ricompense in token
I token crypto con entrate reali sono un sottoinsieme specifico della più ampia categoria dei token di ricompensa. Per qualificarsi, gli asset distribuiti devono provenire da commissioni pagate dagli utenti per un servizio, non da una nuova offerta creata. Un modello di emissione funziona in modo opposto: il protocollo pianifica un rilascio di offerta, i token vanno a staker o detentori, e il pool di ricompense si riduce man mano che l'offerta si esaurisce o diluisce i detentori mentre si espande. La domanda cruciale: da dove proviene realmente l'asset distribuito? Se la risposta è "lo coniamo noi", il modello è di emissione. Se la risposta è "gli utenti pagano commissioni e una parte va a te", il modello è finanziato da entrate. Una domanda secondaria: l'asset distribuito viene riacquistato dal mercato aperto o è di nuova creazione? I riacquisti creano domanda reale al momento della distribuzione. La nuova emissione crea pressione sull'offerta. $BANANA, il token dietro @BananaGunBot , distribuisce ricompense acquistate dal mercato aperto utilizzando entrate reali da commissioni di trading, non coniato da un pool di nuova emissione. La base delle commissioni: oltre $16 miliardi in volume di trading cumulativo. Meccaniche complete su dashboard.bananagun.io.
Token Crypto Con Entrate Reali: Come La Condivisione Delle Commissioni Differisce Dalle Emissioni
La maggior parte dei programmi di ricompensa in token non è finanziata da entrate. Sono finanziati dall'espansione dell'offerta: il protocollo conia nuovi token, li distribuisce come ricompense e lo chiama rendimento. La distinzione è importante perché queste due fonti di finanziamento hanno effetti opposti sull'offerta di token nel tempo.
Emissioni vs entrate: da dove provengono realmente le ricompense in token
I token crypto con entrate reali sono un sottoinsieme specifico della più ampia categoria dei token di ricompensa. Per qualificarsi, gli asset distribuiti devono provenire da commissioni pagate dagli utenti per un servizio, non da una nuova offerta creata. Un modello di emissione funziona in modo opposto: il protocollo pianifica un rilascio di offerta, i token vanno a staker o detentori, e il pool di ricompense si riduce man mano che l'offerta si esaurisce o diluisce i detentori mentre si espande. La domanda cruciale: da dove proviene realmente l'asset distribuito? Se la risposta è "lo coniamo noi", il modello è di emissione. Se la risposta è "gli utenti pagano commissioni e una parte va a te", il modello è finanziato da entrate. Una domanda secondaria: l'asset distribuito viene riacquistato dal mercato aperto o è di nuova creazione? I riacquisti creano domanda reale al momento della distribuzione. La nuova emissione crea pressione sull'offerta. $BANANA, il token dietro @BananaGun , distribuisce ricompense acquistate dal mercato aperto utilizzando entrate reali da commissioni di trading, non coniato da un pool di nuova emissione. La base delle commissioni: oltre $16 miliardi in volume di trading cumulativo. Meccaniche complete su dashboard.bananagun.io.
Emissioni vs entrate: da dove provengono realmente le ricompense in token
I token crypto con entrate reali sono un sottoinsieme specifico della più ampia categoria dei token di ricompensa. Per qualificarsi, gli asset distribuiti devono provenire da commissioni pagate dagli utenti per un servizio, non da una nuova offerta creata. Un modello di emissione funziona in modo opposto: il protocollo pianifica un rilascio di offerta, i token vanno a staker o detentori, e il pool di ricompense si riduce man mano che l'offerta si esaurisce o diluisce i detentori mentre si espande. La domanda cruciale: da dove proviene realmente l'asset distribuito? Se la risposta è "lo coniamo noi", il modello è di emissione. Se la risposta è "gli utenti pagano commissioni e una parte va a te", il modello è finanziato da entrate. Una domanda secondaria: l'asset distribuito viene riacquistato dal mercato aperto o è di nuova creazione? I riacquisti creano domanda reale al momento della distribuzione. La nuova emissione crea pressione sull'offerta. $BANANA, il token dietro @BananaGun , distribuisce ricompense acquistate dal mercato aperto utilizzando entrate reali da commissioni di trading, non coniato da un pool di nuova emissione. La base delle commissioni: oltre $16 miliardi in volume di trading cumulativo. Meccaniche complete su dashboard.bananagun.io.
267
·
--
Rialzista
Compreresti il dip su $VELVET ?
Ha pompato forte per giorni, poi è crollato pesantemente oggi.
Ora sta stampando una brutta candela rossa dopo essere andato verticale.
Questo è o il primo vero dip prima di un altro rialzo, o l'inizio di un reset totale.
Chi sta cercando di afferrare i coltelli qui?
Compreresti il dip su $VELVET ?
Ha pompato forte per giorni, poi è crollato pesantemente oggi.
Ora sta stampando una brutta candela rossa dopo essere andato verticale.
Questo è o il primo vero dip prima di un altro rialzo, o l'inizio di un reset totale.
Chi sta cercando di afferrare i coltelli qui?
Ha pompato forte per giorni, poi è crollato pesantemente oggi.
Ora sta stampando una brutta candela rossa dopo essere andato verticale.
Questo è o il primo vero dip prima di un altro rialzo, o l'inizio di un reset totale.
Chi sta cercando di afferrare i coltelli qui?
435
·
--
I Migliori Terminali di Trading Web per il Trading On-Chain: Banana Pro vs GMGN vs Photon vs BullXI bot di Telegram gestiscono esecuzioni rapide, ma ti danno quasi nessuno spazio sullo schermo per l'analisi. Un terminale di trading web dedicato risolve questo problema mettendo grafico, inserimento ordini, gestione delle posizioni, tracciamento del portafoglio e feed di scoperta su un'unica schermata contemporaneamente. I terminali da valutare nel 2026 ognuno adotta una filosofia diversa per quel problema di layout.
Cos'è un terminale di trading on-chain
Un terminale di trading on-chain è un'interfaccia basata su browser che si collega direttamente agli exchange decentralizzati su una o più blockchain, fornendo analisi grafica integrata, scoperta di token, esecuzione di trade e tracciamento delle posizioni in un unico spazio di lavoro, senza instradare gli ordini attraverso un exchange centralizzato o un custode. A differenza di un bot di trading Telegram che opera attraverso un'interfaccia chat, un terminale ti offre un layout multi-pannello persistente, visualizzazione dei dati in tempo reale e la possibilità di gestire posizioni su più portafogli contemporaneamente. Criteri chiave di valutazione: quali blockchain e DEX sono supportati, se il modello è non-custodial, come appare il processo di login e recupero, e se le posizioni aperte nel terminale si sincronizzano di nuovo con un bot di Telegram. Banana Pro, il terminale di trading web di Banana Gun su pro.bananagun.io, è gratuito e copre ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base e MegaETH in un'unica interfaccia. Include 20 widget modulari drag-and-drop e piena sincronizzazione bidirezionale con il bot di Telegram di Banana Gun, il che significa che le posizioni aperte tramite il bot appaiono nel terminale e le modifiche apportate dal terminale si riflettono nel bot.
I Migliori Terminali di Trading Web per il Trading On-Chain: Banana Pro vs GMGN vs Photon vs BullX
I bot di Telegram gestiscono esecuzioni rapide, ma ti danno quasi nessuno spazio sullo schermo per l'analisi. Un terminale di trading web dedicato risolve questo problema mettendo grafico, inserimento ordini, gestione delle posizioni, tracciamento del portafoglio e feed di scoperta su un'unica schermata contemporaneamente. I terminali da valutare nel 2026 ognuno adotta una filosofia diversa per quel problema di layout.
Cos'è un terminale di trading on-chain
Un terminale di trading on-chain è un'interfaccia basata su browser che si collega direttamente agli exchange decentralizzati su una o più blockchain, fornendo analisi grafica integrata, scoperta di token, esecuzione di trade e tracciamento delle posizioni in un unico spazio di lavoro, senza instradare gli ordini attraverso un exchange centralizzato o un custode. A differenza di un bot di trading Telegram che opera attraverso un'interfaccia chat, un terminale ti offre un layout multi-pannello persistente, visualizzazione dei dati in tempo reale e la possibilità di gestire posizioni su più portafogli contemporaneamente. Criteri chiave di valutazione: quali blockchain e DEX sono supportati, se il modello è non-custodial, come appare il processo di login e recupero, e se le posizioni aperte nel terminale si sincronizzano di nuovo con un bot di Telegram. Banana Pro, il terminale di trading web di Banana Gun su pro.bananagun.io, è gratuito e copre ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base e MegaETH in un'unica interfaccia. Include 20 widget modulari drag-and-drop e piena sincronizzazione bidirezionale con il bot di Telegram di Banana Gun, il che significa che le posizioni aperte tramite il bot appaiono nel terminale e le modifiche apportate dal terminale si riflettono nel bot.
Cos'è un terminale di trading on-chain
Un terminale di trading on-chain è un'interfaccia basata su browser che si collega direttamente agli exchange decentralizzati su una o più blockchain, fornendo analisi grafica integrata, scoperta di token, esecuzione di trade e tracciamento delle posizioni in un unico spazio di lavoro, senza instradare gli ordini attraverso un exchange centralizzato o un custode. A differenza di un bot di trading Telegram che opera attraverso un'interfaccia chat, un terminale ti offre un layout multi-pannello persistente, visualizzazione dei dati in tempo reale e la possibilità di gestire posizioni su più portafogli contemporaneamente. Criteri chiave di valutazione: quali blockchain e DEX sono supportati, se il modello è non-custodial, come appare il processo di login e recupero, e se le posizioni aperte nel terminale si sincronizzano di nuovo con un bot di Telegram. Banana Pro, il terminale di trading web di Banana Gun su pro.bananagun.io, è gratuito e copre ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base e MegaETH in un'unica interfaccia. Include 20 widget modulari drag-and-drop e piena sincronizzazione bidirezionale con il bot di Telegram di Banana Gun, il che significa che le posizioni aperte tramite il bot appaiono nel terminale e le modifiche apportate dal terminale si riflettono nel bot.
162
·
--
Rialzista
Cosa sta succedendo con $BEAT?
Tutto il resto sta sanguinando, ma questa cosa continua a spingere e a rompere ATH dopo ATH.
Girano voci che il movimento sia manipolato.
Forza reale o trappola?
Continuerà a salire?
Cosa sta succedendo con $BEAT?
Tutto il resto sta sanguinando, ma questa cosa continua a spingere e a rompere ATH dopo ATH.
Girano voci che il movimento sia manipolato.
Forza reale o trappola?
Continuerà a salire?
Tutto il resto sta sanguinando, ma questa cosa continua a spingere e a rompere ATH dopo ATH.
Girano voci che il movimento sia manipolato.
Forza reale o trappola?
Continuerà a salire?
2
1
345
·
--
Rialzista
Ho preso il tuffo di $BUTTCOIN ieri, e ora sono in profitto dopo il breakout.
Avevo impostato ordini di acquisto su @BananaGunBot ieri sera, e si sono riempiti perfettamente durante il tuffo.
Sembra proprio che questo sia solo l'inizio del rally di $BUTTCOIN.
Ho preso il tuffo di $BUTTCOIN ieri, e ora sono in profitto dopo il breakout.
Avevo impostato ordini di acquisto su @BananaGun ieri sera, e si sono riempiti perfettamente durante il tuffo.
Sembra proprio che questo sia solo l'inizio del rally di $BUTTCOIN.
Avevo impostato ordini di acquisto su @BananaGun ieri sera, e si sono riempiti perfettamente durante il tuffo.
Sembra proprio che questo sia solo l'inizio del rally di $BUTTCOIN.
1
1
435
·
--
Rialzista
Il $IO sta per fare un rally di recupero nella stagione dell'AI?
Il trend settimanale al ribasso sembra finalmente rompersi.
Livello d'ingresso che sto monitorando: $0.13-$0.15
SL: sotto $0.07
Obiettivo: $5.18
Se questo recupero tiene, il potenziale è pazzesco.
Il $IO sta per fare un rally di recupero nella stagione dell'AI?
Il trend settimanale al ribasso sembra finalmente rompersi.
Livello d'ingresso che sto monitorando: $0.13-$0.15
SL: sotto $0.07
Obiettivo: $5.18
Se questo recupero tiene, il potenziale è pazzesco.
Il trend settimanale al ribasso sembra finalmente rompersi.
Livello d'ingresso che sto monitorando: $0.13-$0.15
SL: sotto $0.07
Obiettivo: $5.18
Se questo recupero tiene, il potenziale è pazzesco.
221
·
--
Rialzista
Comprare $BANANA qui sembra pazzesco.
Se risale verso l'ATH, sono circa 25x da qui.
$100 a questo livello potrebbero trasformarsi in circa $2.5K.
Ecco perché sto accumulando gemme di altcoin prima che il mercato toro diventi rumoroso.
Comprare $BANANA qui sembra pazzesco.
Se risale verso l'ATH, sono circa 25x da qui.
$100 a questo livello potrebbero trasformarsi in circa $2.5K.
Ecco perché sto accumulando gemme di altcoin prima che il mercato toro diventi rumoroso.
Se risale verso l'ATH, sono circa 25x da qui.
$100 a questo livello potrebbero trasformarsi in circa $2.5K.
Ecco perché sto accumulando gemme di altcoin prima che il mercato toro diventi rumoroso.
1
349
·
--
Ribassista
Chi sta shortando $NEAR con me in questo momento?
I ribassisti sono al comando per il momento, e il setup sembra pulito.
Potrebbe essere un'operazione solida se questa debolezza continua.
Chi sta shortando $NEAR con me in questo momento?
I ribassisti sono al comando per il momento, e il setup sembra pulito.
Potrebbe essere un'operazione solida se questa debolezza continua.
I ribassisti sono al comando per il momento, e il setup sembra pulito.
Potrebbe essere un'operazione solida se questa debolezza continua.
78
·
--
Rialzista
Qualcuno sta seguendo $NPC qui?
Gli acquisti dei balenoni stanno arrivando mentre il grafico è vicino ai minimi.
Potrebbe diventare frenetico se Elon riporta #NPC sulla timeline.
CA: 0x8ed97a637a790be1feff5e888d43629dc05408f6
https://pro.bananagun.io/eth/0x69c7bd26512f52bf6f76fab834140d13dda673ca
Qualcuno sta seguendo $NPC qui?
Gli acquisti dei balenoni stanno arrivando mentre il grafico è vicino ai minimi.
Potrebbe diventare frenetico se Elon riporta #NPC sulla timeline.
CA: 0x8ed97a637a790be1feff5e888d43629dc05408f6
https://pro.bananagun.io/eth/0x69c7bd26512f52bf6f76fab834140d13dda673ca
Gli acquisti dei balenoni stanno arrivando mentre il grafico è vicino ai minimi.
Potrebbe diventare frenetico se Elon riporta #NPC sulla timeline.
CA: 0x8ed97a637a790be1feff5e888d43629dc05408f6
https://pro.bananagun.io/eth/0x69c7bd26512f52bf6f76fab834140d13dda673ca
508
Accedi per esplorare più contenuti
Unisciti agli utenti crypto globali su Binance Square
⚡️ Ottieni informazioni aggiornate e utili sulle crypto.
💬 Scelto dal più grande exchange crypto al mondo.
👍 Scopri approfondimenti autentici da creator verificati.
Email / numero di telefono