#secsaystokenbuybacksnotautosecurities đš
NEW: SEC staff has issued fresh crypto guidance clarifying how token buybacks, continued development, marketing, and liquid staking tokens are treated under securities
laws.
âą Development: Once a network is functional, teams can continue building, upgrading, and funding development without those activities being considered âessential managerial effortsâ that could keep a token tied to an investment contract.
âą Token buybacks: Buybacks of a non security token on a functional network do not, by themselves, constitute âessential managerial efforts.â For unfinished networks, the answer can change if buybacks are promoted as creating âyield or returnâ for holders.
âą Liquid staking: Staking receipt tokens representing non security crypto can be treated as a âdigital tool,â while protocol issued LSTs can also qualify as âdigital commodities.â
âą Marketing: Teams can promote a networkâs existing utility and discuss future features without automatically creating a securities issue. The key distinction is whether the promotion creates expectations of profits based on the teamâs work.
âą Decentralized networks: Once a functional network has âno central partyâ controlling its success or failure, statements from the original issuer are unlikely to create a new investment contract around the native token.
âą Exchange listings: A trading platform is not automatically considered a token promoter simply because it provides a secondary market for the asset.$FOGO $SPELL $SAGA
NEW: SEC staff has issued fresh crypto guidance clarifying how token buybacks, continued development, marketing, and liquid staking tokens are treated under securities
laws.
âą Development: Once a network is functional, teams can continue building, upgrading, and funding development without those activities being considered âessential managerial effortsâ that could keep a token tied to an investment contract.
âą Token buybacks: Buybacks of a non security token on a functional network do not, by themselves, constitute âessential managerial efforts.â For unfinished networks, the answer can change if buybacks are promoted as creating âyield or returnâ for holders.
âą Liquid staking: Staking receipt tokens representing non security crypto can be treated as a âdigital tool,â while protocol issued LSTs can also qualify as âdigital commodities.â
âą Marketing: Teams can promote a networkâs existing utility and discuss future features without automatically creating a securities issue. The key distinction is whether the promotion creates expectations of profits based on the teamâs work.
âą Decentralized networks: Once a functional network has âno central partyâ controlling its success or failure, statements from the original issuer are unlikely to create a new investment contract around the native token.
âą Exchange listings: A trading platform is not automatically considered a token promoter simply because it provides a secondary market for the asset.$FOGO $SPELL $SAGA
