TrustlessState
0 Following
1 Followers
3 Liked
0 Shared
Posts
In honor of Coinbase sponsoring the U.S. Army, I'd like to resurface this 2019 banger from @nic__carter
its the best articulation of the relationship between crypto and world peace that I've ever read
https://medium.com/@nic__carter/a-most-peaceful-revolution-8b63b64c203e
its the best articulation of the relationship between crypto and world peace that I've ever read
https://medium.com/@nic__carter/a-most-peaceful-revolution-8b63b64c203e
big day for the $COIN boys
If Coinbase doesn’t say ‘Ethereum’ in their marketing language, that’s Ethereum’s problem not Coinbase’s
Rational actors will act rationally
Ethereum must fix its foundation to create stronger alignment among its ecosystem
Integrate the rollups.
Make them Native + Based.
Rational actors will act rationally
Ethereum must fix its foundation to create stronger alignment among its ecosystem
Integrate the rollups.
Make them Native + Based.
Who's the analyst that's the most bullish on $COIN??
Just be bullish ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Coinbase released a TON of cool stuff yesterday
@JackInabinet summarizes everything on the @BanklessHQ newsletter
Give it a read!
https://www.bankless.com/read/everything-that-coinbase-announced-yesterday
@JackInabinet summarizes everything on the @BanklessHQ newsletter
Give it a read!
https://www.bankless.com/read/everything-that-coinbase-announced-yesterday
COIN vs HOOD will be the fight of the decade
With @unichain’s 200ms blocks and heavy investment in order execution optimization…
Why doesn’t Unichain launch an orderbook perp DEX and go after Hyperliquids market share?
Why doesn’t Unichain launch an orderbook perp DEX and go after Hyperliquids market share?
jfc 15% gap open on $CRCL trading at $98 again
I heard there was liquidity @VelodromeFi
How is GDP measured in the blockchain context?
Pretty sure REV is just another crypto rebrand for DCF
As I understand it, REV is just 'how much people paid to use the chain'
Seems like a pretty solid measure for signal
No metric has ever been the end-all, be-all -- REV included. But it's a dead-simple lens for understanding the value a chain brings to users.
Seems like a pretty solid measure for signal
No metric has ever been the end-all, be-all -- REV included. But it's a dead-simple lens for understanding the value a chain brings to users.
DAVID WHY ARE YOU BRINGING JON CHARB ON THE PODCAST SO OFTEN
————————
I’ve gotten this take enough times, I figured I’d write a tweet
First, @jon_charb is not the boogeyman you think he is. On Twitter, he’s blunt and direct, which might come off as harsh. I’m yet to see anything insincere. Many people in Ethereum disagree with his takes, but it would be foolish to think he’s therefore being dishonest.
Second, I’ve selected all three members of our weekly roundtable, @0xBreadguy, @andy8052, and @jon_charb because every time I talk to each one, they teach me something. The roundtable is my selfish opportunity to learn a lot about a variety of perspectives across crypto - something that 2021-2023 era Bankless lacked in.
Third, Jon represents the archetype of an investor who would totally buy ETH, if ETH deserved it. Despite what people want to think, I don’t believe Jon has any undue bias against Ethereum. He’s an investor with a coherent thought process, and I want to learn from Jon’s perspective about why he is not buying ETH, so I can better help Ethereum’s future so Jon is more likely to buy ETH tomorrow.
If we keep listening to the same people, who already own ETH, we’re going to not hear the signals about why the next marginal buyers of ETH are not buying.
——————————
There’s probably more reasons, but those are the big ones
1. Jon is a rational, honest actor. If you disagree, I ask that you also check your own bias
2. Jon has taught me a lot, and continues to do so. I am not alone here - much of the industry has been assisted by Jon’s research and analysis
3. Jon is the person that Ethereum should aspire towards converting. If we keep making boogeymen out of Ethereum’s potential TAM, Ethereum will take further steps down a path towards irrelevancy
————————
I’ve gotten this take enough times, I figured I’d write a tweet
First, @jon_charb is not the boogeyman you think he is. On Twitter, he’s blunt and direct, which might come off as harsh. I’m yet to see anything insincere. Many people in Ethereum disagree with his takes, but it would be foolish to think he’s therefore being dishonest.
Second, I’ve selected all three members of our weekly roundtable, @0xBreadguy, @andy8052, and @jon_charb because every time I talk to each one, they teach me something. The roundtable is my selfish opportunity to learn a lot about a variety of perspectives across crypto - something that 2021-2023 era Bankless lacked in.
Third, Jon represents the archetype of an investor who would totally buy ETH, if ETH deserved it. Despite what people want to think, I don’t believe Jon has any undue bias against Ethereum. He’s an investor with a coherent thought process, and I want to learn from Jon’s perspective about why he is not buying ETH, so I can better help Ethereum’s future so Jon is more likely to buy ETH tomorrow.
If we keep listening to the same people, who already own ETH, we’re going to not hear the signals about why the next marginal buyers of ETH are not buying.
——————————
There’s probably more reasons, but those are the big ones
1. Jon is a rational, honest actor. If you disagree, I ask that you also check your own bias
2. Jon has taught me a lot, and continues to do so. I am not alone here - much of the industry has been assisted by Jon’s research and analysis
3. Jon is the person that Ethereum should aspire towards converting. If we keep making boogeymen out of Ethereum’s potential TAM, Ethereum will take further steps down a path towards irrelevancy
Login to explore more contents