Hypothesis: Bitcoin will go through another fork in the next 12-18mo, as the community once again asks the question: should the chain remain untouched or should it evolve?
Bitcoin Knots, the client software that helps miners block "spammy" transactions, is currently witnessing their usage surge to over 10% in the last few months as miners say no to validating transactions with discounted storage (as introduced by SegWit).
According to Peter Todd, Bitcoin needs a a soft fork to accomplish the goal of properly blocking "spam" (https://t.co/FTFAI3TbUd) but my hunch is that this ends up stirring a larger debate about: - who really controls Bitcoin today - what actual Bitcoin holders want from the protocol moving forward - what are the mechanisms by which the community finds social consensus while crossing the chasm to institutional/nation-state adoption
It's still unclear to me how exactly this ends, but honestly I couldn't be more excited to watch it unfold again. Evolve or repeat!
Had a realization last night that when I do finally get down on one knee, the best thing I will be able to stake in that moment will be my cryptopunk, not some diamond
New Essay: Competing to Build The Next Yellow Brick Road
In this piece I argue that the winning ecosystem in crypto will be the one that manages to bring together all four key archetypes onto one chain: the cryptoanarchists, the degen gamblers, the bankers, and the unbanked
I remain bullish on people in crypto who prove again and again they can rise above the midwit nihilism and find ways to create meaning/value on their own
There’s nothing sad and boring about the old meta dying; this is a prerequisite for the new thing having the space to grow!!!