fjun99

Maybe I am dull, but I know the role of stablecoins in the crypto space.

Then, I see various traditional finance people promoting stablecoins, and it feels like they are saying a lot about how stablecoins are revolutionary, how they are profitable, and what they can do in traditional currency, finance, and trade, seemingly trying to imply something.

But I just can't find the point they are subtly expressing.

Perhaps, they are just talking nonsense.

Tell a not-so-funny joke

ETH is a better speculative target

Because the volatility is greater than Bitcoin's🤣

If we say, if indeed, the decline of Polkadot actually originated from slot auctions

Then, if we look back, at what moment did Ethereum also decline?

At least, this round of Ethereum's decline is the rise of roll-up L2.

The current narrative is really hard to explain

RWA doesn't necessarily mean RWA

Stablecoins don't necessarily mean stablecoins

I'm just curious to ask, is it possible that we're not talking about the same thing?

Trump has dragged crypto into the swamp, and yes, no one knows how to fight back yet.

Read an article that scares you to death: HODL is dead, DAO has malfunctioned, DeFi is retreating. DAO malfunction is reluctantly acknowledged, the first BTC HODL is definitely effective, and the third DeFi is thriving.

This person really is good at alarmism.

Many people will compare Solana and Ethereum, and indeed they can be compared.

So let's compare them. Although the Ethereum ecosystem has also seen the emergence of NFT, which is almost a scam,

compared to the meme/pumpfun of the current Solana ecosystem, doesn't NFT still feel somewhat reasonable and makes sense?