Home
Notification
Profile
Trending Articles
News
Bookmarked and Liked
History
Creator Center
Settings
danrobinson
11
Posts
Follow
danrobinson
Follow
0
Following
1
Followers
1
Liked
0
Shared
All Content
Posts
danrobinson
--
Trying to get o3 to write a paper for me and it got stuck on a pretty basic misunderstanding of AMMs and path dependency So we're now 10 messages deep into an argument about it Incredibly addictive, this will replace Twitter
Trying to get o3 to write a paper for me and it got stuck on a pretty basic misunderstanding of AMMs and path dependency
So we're now 10 messages deep into an argument about it
Incredibly addictive, this will replace Twitter
danrobinson
--
The deeper you get into DEX design, the sillier it feels to be dogmatic about any of it Everything depends on fiddly microstructure details
The deeper you get into DEX design, the sillier it feels to be dogmatic about any of it
Everything depends on fiddly microstructure details
danrobinson
--
Is there any way to do an onchain prediction market for p(doom)? Given the impossibility of settlement in the apocalypse and the difficulty of credit in the non-apocalypse case
Is there any way to do an onchain prediction market for p(doom)?
Given the impossibility of settlement in the apocalypse and the difficulty of credit in the non-apocalypse case
danrobinson
--
“Don’t use chains with centralized sequencers, since someday they might subtly extract value from you Instead use decentralized sequencers that are guaranteed to extract maximum value from you, today”
“Don’t use chains with centralized sequencers, since someday they might subtly extract value from you
Instead use decentralized sequencers that are guaranteed to extract maximum value from you, today”
danrobinson
--
I don’t think whether a sequencer is decentralized matters too much What matters most is what rules they follow, and particularly whether they use their power to hurt users or extract value You can have extractive decentralized sequencers, or nonextractive centralized ones
I don’t think whether a sequencer is decentralized matters too much
What matters most is what rules they follow, and particularly whether they use their power to hurt users or extract value
You can have extractive decentralized sequencers, or nonextractive centralized ones
danrobinson
--
Any researchers at Solana Accelerate who want to meet up? DMs are open
Any researchers at Solana Accelerate who want to meet up? DMs are open
SOL
danrobinson
--
Here's a mystery: AMMs seem to be much more profitable when buying ETH than selling it Look at how these cumulative markouts (grouped by direction) diverge over time The pool made >$20m from its ETH buys, but lost >$24m from its ETH sells! Any theories?
Here's a mystery:
AMMs seem to be much more profitable when buying ETH than selling it
Look at how these cumulative markouts (grouped by direction) diverge over time
The pool made >$20m from its ETH buys, but lost >$24m from its ETH sells!
Any theories?
ETH
USDC
danrobinson
--
These are the cumulative 15m markouts for the Fluid ETH/USDC pool. It has bled out $8.5m in EV, and its trades were unprofitable all the time, not just during rebalances. There are no profits to make up for the costs from rebalancing. The pool never makes money in expectation.
These are the cumulative 15m markouts for the Fluid ETH/USDC pool.
It has bled out $8.5m in EV, and its trades were unprofitable all the time, not just during rebalances.
There are no profits to make up for the costs from rebalancing. The pool never makes money in expectation.
ETH
USDC
danrobinson
--
Respect for @0xfluid posting this post-mortem But their proposed solution—to make liquidity more concentrated—seems like the wrong choice The pool is not just losing money during rebalances. It is losing money constantly—AFAICT, fees do not make up for arb losses So concentrating liquidity more would be a double whammy—faster loss to arbs between rebalances, and more frequent rebalances
Respect for @0xfluid posting this post-mortem
But their proposed solution—to make liquidity more concentrated—seems like the wrong choice
The pool is not just losing money during rebalances. It is losing money constantly—AFAICT, fees do not make up for arb losses
So concentrating liquidity more would be a double whammy—faster loss to arbs between rebalances, and more frequent rebalances
ETH
USDC
danrobinson
--
Fast trustless bridges usually require payments to be locked up in escrow But what if users could just send to the relayer—trustlessly, and at a fraction of the capital and gas cost of the escrowed model? Introducing Across Prime, a new design from me @hal2001 @mrice32 🧵
Fast trustless bridges usually require payments to be locked up in escrow
But what if users could just send to the relayer—trustlessly, and at a fraction of the capital and gas cost of the escrowed model?
Introducing Across Prime, a new design from me @hal2001 @mrice32
🧵
danrobinson
--
Every Ethereum researcher is focused on MEV when their biggest problem is scaling Every Solana researcher is focused on scaling when their biggest problem is MEV
Every Ethereum researcher is focused on MEV when their biggest problem is scaling
Every Solana researcher is focused on scaling when their biggest problem is MEV
SOL
ETH
Login to explore more contents
Login
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sign Up
Login
Trending Topics
PowellRemarks
17.5M views
45,169 Discussing
#PowellRemarks 🚨 POWELL SPEAKS — MARKETS LISTEN. 🧠💼 Fed Chair Jerome Powell just dropped some heavy macro signals — and every Binance trader should be paying attention. Here's the TL;DR with crypto lens clarity 👇 🟨 Rates Held Steady: The Fed locks in interest rates at 4.25%–4.5%, playing the “wait-and-see” game. 🕒 Powell says they're “well positioned to wait” — meaning no rush to pivot, even with inflation creeping in. 📈 Stagflation Signals: GDP projections cut. Inflation outlook raised. Translation? Slow growth + sticky prices = stagflation fears are real. 💼 Economy Still Resilient (for now): “The U.S. economy has defied all kinds of forecasts,” Powell says. Labor market? Still strong. Recession? Not in sight — yet. But cracks are showing... 💥 Tariffs = Inflation Bomb Loading: Powell admits: “Tariffs WILL be passed to consumers.” Businesses, manufacturers, exporters — someone pays, and eventually, it’s YOU. That means inflation boost incoming — and guess what thrives in inflation? 👉 #Bitcoin. 📊 Binance Traders Take Note: This isn’t just a Fed update — this is a macro pressure cooker. 💹 Rate pause = volatility opportunity 🏦 Inflation = digital assets hedge power 🧠 Smart money positions early. Dumb money reacts late. Stay nimble. Stay informed. The Fed might wait—but you shouldn't. #PowellRemarks #CryptoStocks #Share_or_Quote_This_Post $BNB $SUI
MR CRYPTO LOVER
0 Likes
316 views
CryptoStocks
62,433 views
543 Discussing
MyTradingStyle
1.9M views
22,672 Discussing
View More
Latest News
Sol Strategies Plans Nasdaq Listing with SEC Filing
--
OpenAI Enhances Biosecurity Measures Amid AI Advancements
--
CZ Urges Platforms to Add ‘Will Function’ for Asset Distribution
--
Japan to Adjust Government Bond Sales in 2025/2026 Fiscal Year
--
U.S. House Considers Parallel Advancement of Key Financial Bills
--
View More
Trending Articles
🚨🚨 BREAKING: Russia sends STARK WARNING to the United States 🚨🚨
Crypto Nate
🚨 Russia Issues Dire Warning to the U.S. Over Israel-Iran C
Doctor strange 123
The Fed Pauses, But Crypto Plays Continue: Why Altseason Is Just Delayed — Not Dead📈
CoinQuest
🚨Pi Big news coming — can’t help but give you an early tea
Professor Of BTC_CRYPTO Information
SHORT SUMMARY – FED PRESS CONFERENCE: POLICY FRAMEWORK, AI,
Winner_688-688
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs