BoxMrChen
0 Following
0 Followers
1 Liked
0 Shared
Posts
See original
I am bound by two numbers.
The first half of my life is the college entrance examination score
The second half is the Alpha Point score
The first half of my life is the college entrance examination score
The second half is the Alpha Point score
Thank you crypto!
Verifying my Twitter account for my #GalxeID gid:TcXoUARJgktn6WDSJk8cJE @Galxe
See original
Kaito Conspiracy Disk @stayloudio
Participation Method：
KOLs violate their conscience to flatter from various angles
Core Idea：
A new paradigm for PUA KOLs, successfully replacing the KOL cycle, consulting plans, and business order models. By using a wolf-like competitive approach, KOLs brainwash themselves to find angles.
Summary：
Solved the previous issue where KOL calling projects still required payment
Modified the standard paradigm of the project party's own promotional plan
Through the big-pie drawing model, let KOLs promote in advance, brainwashing retail investors to buy in
Inspiration：
Just as Binance Alpha's listing effect allows countless dormant projects to opportunistically dump. Other projects can also choose to cooperate with KAITO, where in the early stages, they only need to pay Kaito's cooperation fee to gain tens of thousands of free KOL resources; traditional Agent agencies are no longer effective.
True innovation, a hundred times more innovative than @boopdotfun, the real grass-eating and milking model has been initiated, and the good days are yet to come.
Participation Method：
KOLs violate their conscience to flatter from various angles
Core Idea：
A new paradigm for PUA KOLs, successfully replacing the KOL cycle, consulting plans, and business order models. By using a wolf-like competitive approach, KOLs brainwash themselves to find angles.
Summary：
Solved the previous issue where KOL calling projects still required payment
Modified the standard paradigm of the project party's own promotional plan
Through the big-pie drawing model, let KOLs promote in advance, brainwashing retail investors to buy in
Inspiration：
Just as Binance Alpha's listing effect allows countless dormant projects to opportunistically dump. Other projects can also choose to cooperate with KAITO, where in the early stages, they only need to pay Kaito's cooperation fee to gain tens of thousands of free KOL resources; traditional Agent agencies are no longer effective.
True innovation, a hundred times more innovative than @boopdotfun, the real grass-eating and milking model has been initiated, and the good days are yet to come.
See original
I recommend a CLOB that looks comparable to @KuruExchange. @CrystalExch
The interface design and interactive process are very good, it looks pleasing to the eye, and the current activity strategy is clear, it is worth investing in.
https://t.co/TYlAXTg1bh
After trying it, the UX is very good, and it also supports price limits and gradient prices.
It also supports Chinese language (+10 points)
The only drawback is that I don’t know why it takes a very long time to place an order (about 3 seconds). I don’t know if it’s a network problem or a limitation of the private keyless wallet.
The interface design and interactive process are very good, it looks pleasing to the eye, and the current activity strategy is clear, it is worth investing in.
https://t.co/TYlAXTg1bh
After trying it, the UX is very good, and it also supports price limits and gradient prices.
It also supports Chinese language (+10 points)
The only drawback is that I don’t know why it takes a very long time to place an order (about 3 seconds). I don’t know if it’s a network problem or a limitation of the private keyless wallet.
See original
📦 @SuiNetwork This matter actually tells us one thing
The so-called blockchain is built on a consensus layer, and this consensus layer determines the validity of all assets in your blockchain. As long as the consensus layer agrees, the blockchain can arbitrarily issue, transfer, or destroy any token balance you have. They can freely agree to block your transaction from being sent.
However, some chains clearly can do this to recover losses, but they just don't, like ZKSync. They clearly have a way to do it, but they just choose not to, and the outcome is self-evident.
In fact, I don't think it's wrong to do so. Consensus is not only about blockchain consensus; it also includes the consensus of retail investors. Everyone says they focus on technology and the underlying layers, but in reality, it is not that important. What matters is the price of the coin, speed, and transaction fees. This is also a form of consensus, so modifying consensus to protect user assets is not also an expansion of consensus and decentralization?
But some chains, even after being hacked, still put up a facade. I can't even be bothered to criticize them; those centralized sequencers can easily shut down, yet they think they are maintaining decentralized dignity. It's just funny to think about.
The so-called blockchain is built on a consensus layer, and this consensus layer determines the validity of all assets in your blockchain. As long as the consensus layer agrees, the blockchain can arbitrarily issue, transfer, or destroy any token balance you have. They can freely agree to block your transaction from being sent.
However, some chains clearly can do this to recover losses, but they just don't, like ZKSync. They clearly have a way to do it, but they just choose not to, and the outcome is self-evident.
In fact, I don't think it's wrong to do so. Consensus is not only about blockchain consensus; it also includes the consensus of retail investors. Everyone says they focus on technology and the underlying layers, but in reality, it is not that important. What matters is the price of the coin, speed, and transaction fees. This is also a form of consensus, so modifying consensus to protect user assets is not also an expansion of consensus and decentralization?
But some chains, even after being hacked, still put up a facade. I can't even be bothered to criticize them; those centralized sequencers can easily shut down, yet they think they are maintaining decentralized dignity. It's just funny to think about.
See original
I had a good 8 hours of sleep today and woke up to find that the crypto world seems to have updated 30 versions.
See original
Simply experienced @MagicNewton
The feeling can be summed up in four words: 'Flaws do not hide the excellence'
Currently, the functionality is very limited, only providing a looping buy Agent bot. Even the recharge process is extremely laggy and slow, and all interactions are done through the front-end UI. I don't even know what the Agent dialog box on the left is for, as I haven't said a word.
It's purely a fixed process execution; actually, the other issues are not too significant. The problem is that it's just too slow—10 minutes to recharge, 5 minutes to swap, and in the end, the only feature is a scheduled purchase.
As it stands, this product holds no appeal for me. I hope it can improve in the future.
The feeling can be summed up in four words: 'Flaws do not hide the excellence'
Currently, the functionality is very limited, only providing a looping buy Agent bot. Even the recharge process is extremely laggy and slow, and all interactions are done through the front-end UI. I don't even know what the Agent dialog box on the left is for, as I haven't said a word.
It's purely a fixed process execution; actually, the other issues are not too significant. The problem is that it's just too slow—10 minutes to recharge, 5 minutes to swap, and in the end, the only feature is a scheduled purchase.
As it stands, this product holds no appeal for me. I hope it can improve in the future.
See original
I think I've discovered something. The projects being launched now are all abandoning the community and turning to the leaders.
The community can easily be treated as data to be discarded.
I won't say much more, but I think that after spending so much money on something, you end up airdropping me this little bit of garbage. What happened to the promised quantity? What about the distribution ratio? Are the rules changeable at will?
To turn around and give a huge share of gifts just to flatter your exchange, treating us early supporters like dogs?
@heyibinance Can you please manage these projects? At first, they treat users as treasures, but once they establish a relationship with Bian, they kick users aside like dogs. Is there really a need for such projects to go on Bian? Is it really reasonable for the core of a project not to be with the users but to be with the token? Does it make sense for such a token to be listed?
I worked hard to build a project for so long, and in the end, is it not better for alpha users to just move a little?
To put it bluntly, these project parties still need a father to discipline them. After users have been treated like grandsons for so long, they have now truly become grandsons.
I demand that these project parties refund the things I originally purchased. If they can't deliver on their promised rights, then they shouldn't make promises. Is it still somewhat human to go back on your word like this?
The community can easily be treated as data to be discarded.
I won't say much more, but I think that after spending so much money on something, you end up airdropping me this little bit of garbage. What happened to the promised quantity? What about the distribution ratio? Are the rules changeable at will?
To turn around and give a huge share of gifts just to flatter your exchange, treating us early supporters like dogs?
@heyibinance Can you please manage these projects? At first, they treat users as treasures, but once they establish a relationship with Bian, they kick users aside like dogs. Is there really a need for such projects to go on Bian? Is it really reasonable for the core of a project not to be with the users but to be with the token? Does it make sense for such a token to be listed?
I worked hard to build a project for so long, and in the end, is it not better for alpha users to just move a little?
To put it bluntly, these project parties still need a father to discipline them. After users have been treated like grandsons for so long, they have now truly become grandsons.
I demand that these project parties refund the things I originally purchased. If they can't deliver on their promised rights, then they shouldn't make promises. Is it still somewhat human to go back on your word like this?
See original
I think I've discovered something: the projects being released now are all abandoning the community and turning to face the leaders.
The community can easily be discarded as data.
I'm not saying much, but I think spending so much money on something only for you to airdrop me this bit of garbage, where's the promised quantity? Where's the allocation ratio? The rules can just be changed at will?
Turning around to flatter your exchange, directly giving out huge gift packages, treating us early supporters like dogs?
@heyibinance Can you manage these projects? In the beginning, they treat users like treasures, but once they get into good relations with Bian, they kick users aside like dogs. Is there really a need for such projects to go on Bian? Is it really reasonable for a project's core to be in tokens instead of users? Does it have any meaning for such tokens to go up?
I’ve worked hard to build a project for so long, yet in the end, it’s not even as good as an alpha user just moving their fingers.
To put it bluntly, these project parties still need a father to manage them; users have been treated like grandchildren for so long that they’ve now truly become grandchildren.
I demand these project parties refund me for what I originally purchased; if you don’t want the rights, then don’t make promises. Is it still somewhat human to go back on your word now?
The community can easily be discarded as data.
I'm not saying much, but I think spending so much money on something only for you to airdrop me this bit of garbage, where's the promised quantity? Where's the allocation ratio? The rules can just be changed at will?
Turning around to flatter your exchange, directly giving out huge gift packages, treating us early supporters like dogs?
@heyibinance Can you manage these projects? In the beginning, they treat users like treasures, but once they get into good relations with Bian, they kick users aside like dogs. Is there really a need for such projects to go on Bian? Is it really reasonable for a project's core to be in tokens instead of users? Does it have any meaning for such tokens to go up?
I’ve worked hard to build a project for so long, yet in the end, it’s not even as good as an alpha user just moving their fingers.
To put it bluntly, these project parties still need a father to manage them; users have been treated like grandchildren for so long that they’ve now truly become grandchildren.
I demand these project parties refund me for what I originally purchased; if you don’t want the rights, then don’t make promises. Is it still somewhat human to go back on your word now?
Login to explore more contents