Something I haven't seen discussed much yet is the governance angle baked into KITE. It's not a full DAO takeover from day one, but the framework lets agents—and by extension their humans—set programmable rules that go further than spending caps.
Think about a collective of research agents pooling resources. Through KitePass extensions, they could define voting thresholds for shared decisions, like upgrading a model or allocating joint earnings. Rules encoded on-chain, executed automatically when conditions trigger. No endless Discord debates or snapshot votes unless you want them.
The token plays a role too. Holding KITE might weight certain governance actions, or staking could secure higher-trust modules. Docs hint at this without overpromising. Early stage means most of it stays theoretical for now.
I'm unsure how much demand exists. Most agents today are solo tools—personal assistants, trading bots, content scrapers. Coordinating fleets feels like a 2026 or 2027 problem. Still, having the primitives ready matters if the ecosystem grows. We've watched projects retrofit governance later and stumble.
Mid-December price around $0.086, volume steady. No governance proposals live yet, naturally. When the first ones appear—maybe module approvals or incentive tweaks—it'll show whether the community leans centralized or truly decentralized.
Do you picture agent governance becoming a thing, or will humans keep most control longer? Feels like one of those features that could quietly enable bigger things down the line.
