CZ is amazing. CZ drops another golden quote: Strong projects do not need to beg, CEXs will actively grab them!\nRecently, CZ has exploded again.\nThis time he said something that left many project parties silent: \n'If your project is strong enough, exchanges will be eager to list it; \nIf you still have to beg to get your coin listed - then you should think about who is actually creating value.'\nStraight to the point.\nHow many project parties in the crypto world are thinking about 'spending money to get listed' without products or users, only to find that after two days of being online, there are no trades, and the project is directly doomed.\n💥 1. The strong never beg\nCZ speaks frankly: \nDon't complain about listing fees, don't grumble about airdrop requirements.\nIf you're really strong, CEXs will come to talk to you.\nIn short, listing fees are not the problem, a weak project is the problem.\nIf a coin has real potential, exchanges fear getting on too late and losing traffic.\n🔥 2. Don't focus on competitors, focus on users\nCZ also pointed out a key logic: \n'In a decentralized world, no one forces you to adopt a certain business model.\nThink the fees are high? Then set them to 0.\nWant to get listed for free? Use DEX.'\nHe even gave an example: \nPancakeSwap has no listing fees, but the trading volume is still explosive.\nIt proves that the market doesn't care about the charging model, it only cares - can you make users happy.\n💥 3. CEX listings actually have three logics\nCZ made it very clear: different exchanges have different gameplay.\n1️⃣ Some are fully open, listing any coin, but there are a bunch of bad projects and scam coins;\n2️⃣ Some selectively list coins, charging or requiring airdrops, to filter risks;\n3️⃣ More are a mixed model, balancing security and returns using deposits, tiered listings, and Web3 entrances.\nIn other words: \nListing fees are not a black-and-white issue, but a strategic choice.\n🔑 4. Don't get hung up on fees, return to the logic itself\nCZ's subtext is very clear: \n'What project parties need to do is create strong products, strong ecosystems, strong users; \nWhat exchanges need to do is protect users, filter quality; \nAs for listing fees? That's just a trade-off at different stages.'\nIn summary: \n🔥 Strong projects do not need to beg, weak projects will scream until they are hoarse but no one listens.\nThe last sentence goes to the project parties: \nIn the crypto world, real competitiveness is not about 'spending money', but about making exchanges afraid not to list you. BNB and CAKE are amazing.