Last week, while attending a Web3 gathering, a friend asked me what projects I’ve been paying attention to recently. I answered without hesitation: @Boundless . Not because it is particularly popular, but because it is addressing a neglected yet extremely important issue—how to make complex computations trustworthy.


The current Web3 world is facing an awkward situation: on-chain computation is costly, and off-chain computation lacks trust. The complex liquidation strategies of DeFi protocols, the inference processes of AI models, and the state validation of cross-chain bridges—all these computation-intensive tasks need to be executed off-chain, but how to prove the correctness of the execution results has always been a challenge. The emergence of Boundless just fills this gap.


I first recognized this demand while studying the liquidation mechanism of a DeFi protocol. This protocol requires calculating the user's collateral ratio based on real-time price fluctuations, triggering liquidation once it falls below a safety line. The traditional approach relies on oracle and simplified algorithms, but this method is neither accurate enough nor easily manipulated. Through the #Boundless verification network, complex risk models can be fully executed off-chain, and then the correctness of the computation can be proven on-chain through ZK proofs. This method ensures accuracy while saving gas costs.


What excites me even more is its potential applications in the AI field. As AI models increasingly participate in critical areas such as financial decision-making and medical diagnosis, proving the reliability of model outputs has become a focus of regulatory attention. Boundless provides an elegant solution: AI models generate corresponding zero-knowledge proofs alongside their results, proving that the reasoning process complies with preset rules. This is a tremendous help for institutions that require compliance audits.


From an economic model perspective, the #Boundless #Boundless "verification as a service" market allows verifiers to earn rewards by contributing computing power, while developers pay $ZKC to obtain verification services. This model not only incentivizes the effective use of hardware resources but also makes verification capabilities scalable. As the network develops, I believe a professional verification service ecosystem will form.

When writing this article, I was reminded of the early days of the internet. Back then, many people questioned the security of online shopping and found it unimaginable to enter credit card information on a website. However, with the popularity of HTTPS, digital certificates, and other technologies, online shopping has become a part of daily life. I believe ZK verification technology will undergo a similar process, transitioning from a niche tool to infrastructure.


Of course, technical challenges still exist. The generation of ZK proofs still requires a large amount of computational resources, making it a high barrier for ordinary participants. Moreover, the demand for proof types varies greatly across different application scenarios, requiring the network to have sufficient flexibility. However, based on the current development, the team is steadily advancing in optimizing algorithm efficiency and expanding application scenarios.


For friends interested in this field, I suggest learning more about the practical application scenarios of ZK technology, rather than just focusing on token prices. @ is building the trust layer for the next generation of computing, and this value far exceeds short-term speculative opportunities. As more and more applications require verifiable computing, the importance of this network will become increasingly prominent.


I believe that represents not just a technical project but a new paradigm of trust. In this paradigm, trust no longer relies on authoritative institutions or centralized platforms, but comes from mathematical proofs and decentralized verification. When this paradigm matures, we may usher in a digital world of "trustless, self-evident truth."


For friends interested in this area, I suggest learning more about the practical application scenarios of ZK technology, rather than just focusing on token prices. @Boundless is building the trust layer for the next generation of computing, and this value far exceeds short-term speculative opportunities. As more applications require verifiable computing, the importance of this network will become increasingly prominent.