$0G : Analysis of Risk Cases in the South Korean Cryptocurrency Market

Recently, a large number of 0G advertisements have appeared on the streets of South Korea, covering outdoor billboards and KOL promotion channels. From the surface promotion, 0G emphasizes 'modular AI blockchain' and 'cross-chain interoperability', but its technical route is still in the conceptual stage, lacking practical landing cases.

The core operating model of the project shows obvious characteristics of 'money grabbing': investors are guided to purchase nodes, with 15% of the total token supply used for node staking, only initially unlocking 33.33%, creating a sense of scarcity; at the same time, 22% of the investors' tokens are locked, unlocking over 36 months after 12 months. This locking arrangement superficially emphasizes long-term value but actually leaves room for potential sell-offs and market manipulation, highly resembling the early path of FIL relying on staking mining for capital accumulation, which plummeted after unlocking.

From historical experience, the high-risk characteristics of the South Korean cryptocurrency market are evident: the market cap of Terra/Luna went from 40 billion dollars to zero, and the KOK token defrauded about 3 billion dollars, both reflecting the model of 'marketing-driven + false promises'. 0G quickly gathers attention through methods such as 'hundred-fold coins', 'KOL hype', and 'platform endorsement', and its model fits the characteristics of 'lack of applications, relying on speculation, high risk of running away'.

For investors, the phenomenon of $0G provides a clear warning: the project's focus is on advertising and lock-up design, rather than ecological construction and technological implementation. It essentially belongs to capital operation, heavily relying on market sentiment and short-term capital inflow. Investment decisions should focus on risk management, carefully assessing the project's actual value and feasibility.

$BTC $XRP #币安HODLer空投XPL #币安HODLer空投HEMI #狗狗币ETF进展 #永续合约DEX赛道之争