BitMart has withdrawn its application for a digital asset service provider license in Hong Kong, according to a report released on August 28.
According to the list maintained by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), the license application has been recorded as withdrawn on the fifth day; the report published this information on August 28.
MAIN CONTENT
BitMart withdrew its application for a digital asset service license in Hong Kong.
The information mentioned in the report released on August 28.
The withdrawal is reflected on the list maintained by the SFC.
Did BitMart actually withdraw its application for a license in Hong Kong?
Yes, the report dated August 28 states that BitMart has withdrawn its application for a digital asset service provider license in Hong Kong, and this action is recorded on the SFC list as withdrawn on the fifth day.
The list maintained by the SFC is an administrative data source about the registration status of trading platforms; in the original content, the status change for BitMart is directly reflected in that document.
What source is this information based on and how reliable is it?
The information is presented based on the report released on August 28 and the status on the list maintained by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, which is the official source tracking the registration of digital asset service providers.
As the SFC list is an administrative document, the record of 'withdrawn' on the list is often considered an official status indicator; the original content does not provide additional confirmation or statements from the exchange.
Does the report mention the reason for BitMart's withdrawal of the application?
The original content does not state a specific reason for the withdrawal; there is no additional information regarding the basis, official statement, or related deadlines cited.
Therefore, it is not possible to determine the cause based on the data provided; any remarks about motives or consequences without verified sources would be speculation and are not stated in this article.
When is the withdrawal recorded according to the SFC list?
According to the description in the report dated August 28, the SFC list recorded the status as withdrawn on the fifth day; the original content does not specify a more precise date for the withdrawal action.
The SFC list typically updates the status according to the actions of the registrant, so the 'withdrawn' item on the list is an indication of the current status at the time of the report.
What are the next steps that users should take?
The original content does not provide specific recommendations; however, users can check the SFC list directly or the official announcements from the platform to confirm the status and further guidance.
Always prioritize official sources of information, such as documents from regulatory agencies or announcements issued by the platform, to ensure accuracy before making decisions related to assets and accounts.
Notable quotes
Frequently Asked Questions
On what date did BitMart withdraw?
The report released on August 28 states that the application has been recorded as withdrawn on the fifth day; the original content does not specify a more precise date.
Which authority confirmed the withdrawal information?
The withdrawal status is reflected on the list maintained by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), according to the report dated August 28.
Does the report mention the reason for the withdrawal?
No, the original content does not provide reasons or official statements related to the withdrawal.
What source should users check to verify?
Prioritize checking the list and announcements directly from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission or official announcements from the relevant platform.
Source: https://tintucbitcoin.com/bitmart-rut-don-xin-phep-hong-kong/
Thank you for reading this article!
Please Like, Comment, and Follow TinTucBitcoin to stay updated with the latest news on the cryptocurrency market and not miss any important information!