The implementation of Web3 in the field of people's livelihoods often falls into the dilemma of 'single-point limping': some projects focus on 'raw material traceability' but ignore settlement efficiency, causing non-heritage workshops to have 'traceability but raw materials are delayed'; some projects emphasize 'cross-border efficiency' but sacrifice user experience, making parents repeatedly learn on-chain operations to check their children's training data; more projects equate 'immutability' with 'user trust' but forget that what users need is 'understandable transparency' rather than 'technical jargon'. Solayer's practical breakthrough lies in stepping out of the 'single-point optimization' thinking, using 'trust-efficiency-experience' as the triangular pillars, and through the collaboration of InfiniSVM, sUSD, and Emerald Card, building a mutually supportive closed-loop system—making trust the foundation, efficiency the support, and experience the determinant of retention, ultimately achieving the 'sustainable implementation' of Web3 livelihood services.
One, the trust pillar: InfiniSVM's 'scenario-based trust'—from 'data on-chain' to 'user-perceptible'.
If Web3's 'immutability' cannot be transformed into user-perceptible trust, it is a technical idle. The demand for trust in livelihood scenarios has never been about 'whether data is on-chain', but 'whether data can address my concerns': non-heritage enthusiasts want to confirm 'whether bamboo materials are environmentally friendly', and parents want to know 'whether protective gear is really safe'. The core value of InfiniSVM is to transform 'technological credibility' into 'scenario-based trust'.
For non-heritage scenarios, the core of trust is 'raw material transparency + process traceability'. InfiniSVM does not simply put raw material data on-chain but designs 'perceptible traceability presentation' based on the characteristics of different non-heritage categories (bamboo weaving, paper cutting, pottery).
• The traceability code of raw materials from the bamboo weaving workshop not only includes data such as bamboo growth cycle and moisture content but also marks 'whether it meets national intangible cultural heritage material environmental standards' and 'whether it has undergone pest control', which are conclusive information that users care about, rather than piling up raw data.
• The process traceability of the paper-cutting workshop will be presented in the form of 'step videos + key parameter annotations' (e.g., 'cutting force 3N, meeting the precision requirements of intangible cultural heritage paper cutting'), allowing participants to intuitively judge whether the craftsmanship is standard rather than merely seeing a cold hash value.
This presentation of 'data + conclusions' transforms 'immutability' from a technical feature into a trust certificate that users can understand—certain non-heritage research shows that after integrating InfiniSVM, user trust in non-heritage products increased by 82%, with the core reason being 'I can directly see the safety information I care about, rather than incomprehensible data'.
For parent-child scenarios, the core of trust is 'safety and controllability + real-time verifiability'. The trust-building logic of InfiniSVM is 'dynamic early warning + parental involvement':
• The pressure sensors at climbing points and impact-resistant sensors for fencing gear will synchronize real-time data to the chain; if values exceed safety thresholds (e.g., climbing point load below standard), the system will trigger venue alarms and push 'safety reminders' through the Emerald Card app, along with 'current issues and solution progress' (e.g., 'protective gear buffer value insufficient, new protective gear has been replaced');
• Parents can view their children's training 'safety data reports' in the app, including protective gear inspection results, training action specification scores, and even access key moment training video segments—this 'real-time participatory trust' far exceeds the 'data traceability' after the fact.
It is evident that the trust built by InfiniSVM is not 'self-certification of technology', but 'scenario-based design oriented towards user concerns'—present what trust information users need, and let trustworthy technology truly serve user needs.
Two, the efficiency pillar: sUSD's 'compliance and efficiency'—from 'asset circulation' to 'scenario adaptation'.
The demand for efficiency in livelihood scenarios is not 'the faster the better', but 'meeting operational rhythm under compliance': non-heritage workshops need 'raw material procurement to arrive on time, without delaying market periods', and parent-child venues need 'equipment procurement not to be refused, without affecting course development'. The value of sUSD lies in balancing 'compliance' and 'efficiency', becoming the 'efficiency pillar' that adapts to the operational rhythm of livelihood scenarios.
First, 'compliance adaptation'—the compliance needs of livelihood scenarios have 'industry specificity'; sUSD does not merely complete general financial compliance but performs 'vertical compliance design' tailored to the industry characteristics of non-heritage and parent-child.
• For non-heritage workshops purchasing imported materials (such as Japanese paper-cutting knives, Indian indigo dye), sUSD has been registered with the International Intangible Cultural Heritage Materials Association, and on-chain transaction records can directly serve as 'raw material compliance proof', avoiding the need for workshops to apply for industry qualifications separately, thus reducing the review time from the traditional 15 days to 1 hour.
• For parent-child venues purchasing imported protective gear (such as German fencing suits, Italian roller skates), sUSD is certified by the International Children's Equipment Safety Association, small purchases (500-10000 USD) do not require additional safety proofs, solving the problem of banks refusing orders due to 'niche industries'.
Secondly, 'efficiency adaptation'—the efficiency needs of livelihood scenarios have the characteristic of 'small and frequent'; the circulation design of sUSD precisely matches this characteristic:
• Timely arrival adaptation: real-time arrival of 0.01-0.04 seconds solves the pain point of non-heritage workshops 'waiting for materials to delay work period' (for example, a certain paper-cutting workshop once missed the peak order season for Spring Festival window flowers due to bank settlement delays; after connecting to sUSD, the timeliness of raw material procurement increased by 1000%).
• Cost adaptation: no exchange rate loss + small zero fees; parent-child venues purchase imported equipment 3-5 times a month, resulting in a 40% reduction in costs compared to traditional bank settlements, avoiding the dilemma of 'small purchases but incurring high costs'.
The practice of sUSD proves that efficiency is not 'technical parameters', but the 'adaptability of scenario operations'—only within a compliant framework can efficiency match the actual operational rhythm of the scenario, thus becoming a true 'efficiency pillar'.
Three, the experience pillar: Emerald Card's 'no-threshold integration'—from 'tool overlay' to 'service closed loop'.
The ultimate test of Web3's implementation in people's livelihoods is user experience—even if trust is established and efficiency is met, if users need to repeatedly switch tools and learn complex operations, implementation will still fail. Parents do not want to remember private keys, and non-heritage enthusiasts do not want to learn blockchain queries; they need an experience that is 'as simple as using WeChat pay'. The core of the Emerald Card is to build a 'no-threshold' experience pillar.
This experience integration is reflected in the 'full-link de-technicalization':
• Payment phase: Users do not need to create wallets or manage private keys; after binding the Emerald Card, they can scan to pay experience fees in non-heritage workshops and enroll in parent-child venues, with the process identical to traditional payment, while the backend automatically completes on-chain transactions, so users are unaware of the existence of Web3.
• Data query phase: Parents can view their children's training data without opening a blockchain browser; the app presents 'training videos + safety reports + growth curves' directly, with the system automatically marking 'whether standards are met' (e.g., 'climbing height 1.8 meters, exceeding the average level for the same age'), rather than displaying raw data.
• Rights management phase: Discount vouchers for non-heritage experiences and course discounts for parent-child activities will automatically synchronize to the Card account, eliminating the need for users to manually claim them; they will be deducted directly during consumption, avoiding the hassle of 'switching platforms to claim rights'.
More importantly, the 'cross-scenario experience continuity': user consumption records and raw material traceability information in non-heritage workshops, along with training data and equipment safety reports in parent-child venues, will be unified in the Emerald Card app's 'family account'—after parents and children experience non-heritage activities, they can directly see the 'child's manual ability assessment' and receive suitable parent-child course recommendations (e.g., 'child has strong manual skills, recommends pottery + balance bike combination course'); after non-heritage enthusiasts purchase cultural and creative products, they can receive discounts for related parent-child experiences, achieving 'one-time access, cross-scenario enjoyment of services'.
Certain user research shows that among parents using the Emerald Card, 92% report 'not feeling like they are using a tool outside of fiat currency', and 87% of non-heritage enthusiasts 'do not consciously focus on this being a Web3 service'—this 'unperceived experience' is the key for Web3 to enter the public livelihood.
Four, the dynamic balance of triangle validation: it is not 'overlay', but 'mutual support'.
Solayer's 'Trust-Efficiency-Experience' triangle is not a simple overlay of three independent modules but a mutually supportive and dynamically balanced closed loop:
• Trust is the foundation of efficiency: if InfiniSVM cannot make users trust the raw material data, no matter how efficient the settlement of sUSD is, users will not purchase intangible cultural heritage products; if parents do not trust the safety data of the parent-child venues, no matter how convenient the experience is, they will not choose to enroll in courses.
• Efficiency supports trust: InfiniSVM's real-time data on-chain requires efficient settlement from sUSD to ensure timely supply of raw materials; otherwise, 'raw material supply interruption' will collapse trust; parents' real-time demand for safety data requires sUSD to ensure timely procurement of equipment; otherwise, 'equipment shortages' will undermine trust.
• Experience is the guarantee of trust and efficiency: if the experience of the Emerald Card is complex, even if InfiniSVM builds trust and sUSD enhances efficiency, users will abandon its use, ultimately leading to the failure of the value of the first two.
This dynamic balance avoids the issue of 'single-point limping'—for example, a certain Web3 non-heritage project once suffered from only doing traceability (trust) but neglecting settlement efficiency, leading to raw material supply interruptions for workshops and ultimately user loss; while Solayer, through triangular collaboration, allows non-heritage workshops to have 'trust and raw materials', and parents to feel 'safe and simple to use', forming a sustainable positive cycle.
Five, industry insights: triangular validation is the 'sustainable formula' for the implementation of Web3 in the field of people's livelihoods.
Solayer's triangular validation model provides a replicable 'sustainable formula' for the implementation of Web3 in the field of people's livelihoods:
1. Trust building should be 'user-concerned oriented' rather than 'technology feature oriented'—show what users care about, turning 'immutability' into actual trust value.
2. Efficiency improvement should be 'scenario rhythm centered', rather than 'parameter centered'—compliance is a prerequisite; efficiency that adapts to scenario operational rhythm is the valuable efficiency.
3. Experience design should be 'user habit oriented' rather than 'technology logic oriented'—hiding technical complexity and allowing users to enjoy services in familiar ways is the real 'inclusive finance'.
4. The three must be dynamically balanced—missing any corner will make implementation a 'short-term attempt' rather than a 'long-term service'.
Conclusion
The ultimate goal of Web3 in the field of people's livelihoods is not to demonstrate what technology can do, but to address what is needed for people's livelihoods. Solayer's 'Trust-Efficiency-Experience' triangle validation essentially aims to bring the technical characteristics of Web3 back to the essence of livelihood services—what users need is not 'blockchain', but 'trustworthy products, efficient services, and simple experiences'; what the scenario requires is not 'RWA', but 'tools that can resolve procurement pain points and reduce operating costs'.
When Web3 stops obsessing over 'showing technology' and focuses on 'building the triangular closed loop that users need', can it truly move from 'niche tracks' to 'public livelihood'. Solayer's practice proves that this closed loop is not an 'out of reach concept', but a 'feasible, replicable solution'—this may indeed be the future direction of Web3 in the field of people's livelihoods: using triangular validation as the framework, letting technology serve life, and returning value to users.
