Response to your statements about Jager

1. "There are 67 whales that have put in hundreds of thousands."

Whales are everywhere and they only enter at the beginning. SafeMoon had them too. It’s like a casino: seeing big players doesn’t mean the game is healthy, just that they hope to come out winners before others.

2. The 5% tax feeds dividends, LP, and marketing.

It’s a toll. Imagine paying €5 every time you use your car: you would drive much less. Here, it slows natural activity and relies only on the fact that others keep paying.

3. The LP v3 allows tax-free transactions through bots.

Uniswap v3 or Pancake v3 do not accept this type of token. If it works, it’s through fragile detours. And the bots? They don’t protect, they take their cut. Like middlemen who skim off at every pass.

4. The burn is quick: 6.26% in three months.

With a huge supply, 6% is negligible. Imagine a silo filled with millions of bags of wheat: removing 6 changes nothing. And if this burn comes from the tax, it’s not real scarcity, just burning what users have paid.

5. The volume regularly returns to several million.

Volume spikes are not proof. It’s like a fair: it attracts a crowd for two days, then calm returns. Without real utility.

6. "Jager does not aim for a listing on a major exchange."

Often, "we don’t want to" means "we can’t." Tokens with taxes don’t make it onto major exchanges. It’s like building a car that isn’t allowed to drive on the highway and saying: "I didn’t plan to go there."

Your arguments seem solid, but each collapses when brought back to reality. Jager is going in circles: taxes, burns funded by those same taxes, volumes inflated by noise.

If this model is so secure and innovative, why has no major platform like Binance, Coinbase, or Kraken ever listed a token with a 5% tax?