Flipping through the dynamics of @Sign Official suddenly reminds me of the days playing with cross-chain back in the day - when there weren't so many public chains, and transfers relied entirely on the Omni chain. It's not like now where BNB Chain and TRX offer fee-free transactions, which is so convenient.
Sign, as a protocol on Omni, carries a certain warmth just from its 'old chain background.'
What surprised me the most is its 'luxurious investor lineup': Sequoia Capital, yzi labs, and Balla Collective have all entered the scene. This configuration is considered top-notch among similar protocols. But to be honest, its market performance doesn’t quite match this fundamental — it didn’t surge as expected, yet it hasn’t dropped all the way, which is much better compared to projects like Portal and W that have plummeted by dozens of times; at least it hasn’t trapped early investors directly.
Looking at the team, it’s all 'American equipment,' with strength evident; this isn’t some small project without a background. I still remember jumping in during the launch and actually making some gains. Later, someone asked me for investment research; it was actually something a student wrote as practice, and I casually posted it, not expecting it to be referenced by so many people.
However, I sincerely recommend not entering the market now: wait until it drops to 0.01 to invest, as the risk will be much smaller, and the potential for future gains will be greater. After all, no matter how impressive the background is, it still depends on the timing of the entry — the pitfalls I encountered back when I was playing with the Omni chain taught me that even the most reliable projects can easily fail when chasing highs.
To be honest, sharing this is just my personal sentiment and should not be taken as investment advice. If any old Omni players are also keeping an eye on Sign, feel free to discuss the project's future potential together～
