MoobeeFutur2050
--
$Jager 🚫 The major brake: whales will not enter
Big investors, those we call "whales," are the volume drivers in any cryptocurrency. However, a whale will never buy an asset that makes them lose:
5% right at the entry
5% at the exit
In practice, this means that a whale would need to wait for an increase of +11% just to break even. On tens or hundreds of millions, this is prohibitive. As a result: unlike PEPE or SHIBA, Jager cannot attract large speculative capital.
Why the volume will decrease over time
Let's compare with famous meme tokens:
PEPE and SHIBA have no taxes → they can be listed on Binance, Coinbase, OKX, which causes their volume to explode.
Jager, due to its tax system, will never be able to enter these platforms.
Result: its volume remains limited to DEX and a few small CEX. And as time goes on, the initial enthusiasm diminishes.
The burn numbers
Initial supply: 14.6 quadrillions
Burn in 1 year: 0.905 quadrillion (≈ 6.2 %)
Current supply: ≈ 13.7 quadrillions
If we maintain this constant pace (theoretical assumption), it would take:
≈ 15 years to burn everything
≈ 7,500 years to reduce by half (because the supply is monstrous)
Simulation with decreasing volume
But the reality is worse: the burn depends on the volume.
If the volume decreases by only 20% per year (which is common for this type of token), then after 4 years, the annual burn becomes almost insignificant.
In this scenario, the supply would still be around 12-13 quadrillions, meaning barely a few percent burned additionally.
Conclusion
The idea that Jager could burn one third, half, or even the entirety of its supply is a mathematical illusion.
Without whales, there is no large volume.
Without volume, there is no burn.
Without burn, there is no effective deflationary mechanism.
Big investors, those we call "whales," are the volume drivers in any cryptocurrency. However, a whale will never buy an asset that makes them lose:
5% right at the entry
5% at the exit
In practice, this means that a whale would need to wait for an increase of +11% just to break even. On tens or hundreds of millions, this is prohibitive. As a result: unlike PEPE or SHIBA, Jager cannot attract large speculative capital.
Why the volume will decrease over time
Let's compare with famous meme tokens:
PEPE and SHIBA have no taxes → they can be listed on Binance, Coinbase, OKX, which causes their volume to explode.
Jager, due to its tax system, will never be able to enter these platforms.
Result: its volume remains limited to DEX and a few small CEX. And as time goes on, the initial enthusiasm diminishes.
The burn numbers
Initial supply: 14.6 quadrillions
Burn in 1 year: 0.905 quadrillion (≈ 6.2 %)
Current supply: ≈ 13.7 quadrillions
If we maintain this constant pace (theoretical assumption), it would take:
≈ 15 years to burn everything
≈ 7,500 years to reduce by half (because the supply is monstrous)
Simulation with decreasing volume
But the reality is worse: the burn depends on the volume.
If the volume decreases by only 20% per year (which is common for this type of token), then after 4 years, the annual burn becomes almost insignificant.
In this scenario, the supply would still be around 12-13 quadrillions, meaning barely a few percent burned additionally.
Conclusion
The idea that Jager could burn one third, half, or even the entirety of its supply is a mathematical illusion.
Without whales, there is no large volume.
Without volume, there is no burn.
Without burn, there is no effective deflationary mechanism.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
1
0