Many people feel that the biggest barrier to blockchain is its 'complexity'. Ordinary users don't care about consensus mechanisms, zkVM, TPS; they only care about one thing: Is my money safe? Is it smooth to use?
This is precisely the value of @Succinct . Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) sounds abstract, but on the user side, it translates to a kind of 'unperceived peace of mind'.
For example: When users transfer funds across a bridge, their biggest concern is that their money might be hacked during the process. Traditional verification requires a lot of computational power and may also go wrong. In contrast, Succinct's model is 'prove once, verify cheaply'. The computation is done off-chain, and only quick verification of the proof is needed on-chain. What users experience is: fast and secure.
Another example is DeFi applications. Many new users worry about whether the liquidity pool is transparent and whether the profit distribution is fair. Succinct enables protocol parties to generate tamper-proof proofs, demonstrating that the rules are indeed being followed, while users only need lightweight verification.
These seemingly technical breakthroughs ultimately translate into the most basic user experience: no worries about being scammed, no worries about being hacked, no worries about information being opaque.
In my opinion, whether Web3 can enter the mass market does not depend on how flashy the white paper is, but on whether users can 'use it with peace of mind'. And this peace of mind is precisely the value that Succinct brings.
