I used to think that project governance was a game for giants, until I participated in the WalletConnect upgrade vote with WCT - it turns out I actually have a seat in the blockchain village committee! Last week, when voting on the proposal to 'prioritize support for Sui chain integration,' my hand was shaking as I cast my opposing vote, and it surprisingly got adopted! The governance mechanism of WCT allows every token holder to influence the direction of the protocol, such as deciding which new chain to support first or adjusting the staking yield. Although reading technical documents can be overwhelming, the first time I saw my vote change the network rules, I instantly felt a sense of mission to protect the chain community with my mouse. The downside is that smaller holders have a low voting power share, but the weighted mechanism is at least fairer than pure token quantity voting. What is the most hardcore proposal you have voted on? @WalletConnect #walletconnect $WCT