In the past, project governance was always a game for big whales, and retail investors only had the role of bystanders. But when I participated in the Chainbase proposal vote with $C , I suddenly felt like I was in a village committee—last week, regarding the proposal "Should we prioritize indexing Base chain data," my opposing vote was actually accepted! The governance mechanism of $C allows every token holder to influence the priority of data indexing, such as prioritizing the processing of DeFi data or GameFi logs. Although discussing technical parameters can be as daunting as high school math exams, seeing my vote change the network rules gave me an instant sense of mission to protect blockchain civilization with my keyboard. The downside is that small holders have a low voting power ratio, but Chainbase's weighted mechanism is at least fairer than pure token quantity voting. What’s the most hardcore proposal you’ve ever voted on?

@Chainbase Official #chainbase