I am optimistic about Succinct, but not blindly. I focus on three key indicators to determine whether it can truly leap from a 'technical concept button' to 'fundamental Web3 infrastructure':
1. Ecosystem Response Depth: Look at how many real projects (not just wallets or SDKs) have started to go live on SP1 zkVM. I follow the official statements from Polygon, Celestia, etc., monitor the update frequency of dev repos, and track ecosystem implementation. This alone can help determine whether a tech stack is alive.
2. Token Economy Health: Observe the total staking amount, lock-up ratio, and unlocking rhythm to see if the community can steadily absorb them. I use Dune and staking dashboard to look at these numbers, which can reflect whether real participants are willing to support in the long run.
3. User Experience Indicators: I monitor on-chain tx latency, proof generation time, proof cost, and client call difficulty. No matter how great the theory is, it’s more important that users can 'afford it', 'use it', and 'find it easy to use'; all three points need to be measured accurately.
If you write about Succinct, incorporating these three observation directions will make the article more substantial, not just selling the concept but also practical. For me, this is the true style of a research article.
Brothers, what do you most want to see Succinct tackle next? A. Practical developer integration cases; B. Clearer token lock-up and staking mechanisms; C. Optimization of client usage costs and latency. Comment with A/B/C + a sentence on which point you think has the most impact on its survival.
@Succinct #SuccinctLabs $PROVE