🎯 In Succinct, every proof request consumes $PROVE, turning computation into on-chain economic activity.
@Succinct #SuccinctLabs $PROVE
This makes PROVE a working token, not a poster asset idling in treasuries.

🔧 Developers pay proof fees in PROVE through settlement contracts, with amounts precisely metered per request.

The contract executes on-chain, ensuring transparent accounting and straightforward verification by any stakeholder.

💸 Collected fees are distributed programmatically: provers receive the majority, delegators share, treasury retains maintenance.

This replaces inflationary emissions with real revenue flows, aligning security, reliability, and sustainable operations.

Unlike farming campaigns, there is no synthetic APR paid from newly minted supply.

Demand appears only when proofs are useful, binding token usage to measurable application value delivered.

📈 As bridges, rollups, oracles, and AI agents adopt SP1, proof requests naturally compound.

[Speculation] More integrations should deepen the fee market, tightening PROVE float and improving cost discovery.

For builders, the model is practical: call an SDK, receive proofs, settle fees, ship features.

For stakers, the model is accountable: misbehavior faces slashing, while accuracy earns ongoing distributions.

Key idea is simple yet rigorous: each request consumes value, and distributes value immediately.

If you integrate Succinct, you pay only when proofs matter, and everyone sees the receipts.

That discipline creates a utility loop stronger than marketing, reinforcing genuine adoption across varied workloads.

Which workflow would you prove first: bridge validation, oracle attestation, rollup fraud proofs, or private AI inference?