Sometimes, the best way to understand a new token is to find its similarities with history.
For @Succinct , $PROVE has many similarities with the early 'power economy' of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin miners earn BTC by mining with computing power, while in the Prover Network, nodes generate proofs by providing computing power to earn $PROVE.
The difference is that the computing power in the Prover market is not wasted on hash collisions, but is used to generate zero-knowledge proofs that have real demand.
The benefits of this model are:
Real demand → Each proof corresponds to a business need, not 'meaningless computing power'.
Clear incentives → Nodes are motivated to provide more efficient computing power, ensuring network robustness.
Token binding → All payments and staking use $PROVE, forming a complete value closed loop.
From an investment perspective, this makes $P$PROVE the core asset of the 'proof economy'.
As business demand grows, the number of proofs increases, and the value of the token will rise accordingly. This logic is healthier than relying solely on market speculation.
In other words, $PROVE is a token driven by demand, not a short-term target inflated by emotion.
#SuccinctLabs is replicating the successful experience of Bitcoin's 'power economy' but giving it a stronger practical use.