《Is Profitability in Web3 Difficult? Sign Breaks the Deadlock with $15 Million in Revenue and $12 Million in Buyback》

"Can Web3 projects be profitable?" Sign responded with data: in 2024, it earned a whopping $15 million and allocated $12 million for the buyback of $SIGN , @Sign Official , which not only shattered the prejudice that 'infrastructure projects only burn money' but also pointed the industry towards a 'path to profitability'.

Its profit logic is quite simple: target the two scenarios of 'government + business'. Sign Protocol specializes in government-level demands—Thailand aims to digitize ownership proofs, and it provides a full-chain certification system; the UAE lacks public service infrastructure, and it delivers decentralized solutions. These projects have strong compliance and stable payment capability, forming the 'basic revenue base'. TokenTable focuses on the business side: are project teams worried about trouble with token issuance? It uses smart contracts to handle airdrops and unlocks; are holders afraid of vesting period pitfalls? It writes the rules in stone on-chain, maximizing usability, and naturally, people are willing to pay.

The $12 million buyback is a 'confidence booster' for @Sign Official in the market. $8 million publicly buying $SIGN reduces circulation even more; $4 million settled privately stabilizes early investors, avoiding market turbulence. The most crucial point is that this money comes from revenue, not 'funding'—the ability to buy back with its own earnings indicates that the business model has been validated, not just a flash in the pan.

Now it aims to enter more than 20 countries, and Binance Alpha has provided additional circulation channels for $SIGN , allowing it to earn more while protecting the token's value. It’s hard not to gain attention with this approach. #Sign大展橙图 may well be the 'profit model' for Web3, exemplified by Sign.