Witnessed the foreign language zone $BTC maxi battle $ETH maxi, the core debate revolves around the inflation rates of the two.

According to ultrasound data, since Ethereum's transition to PoS, the annual inflation rate has dropped to 0.133%, which is 10 times lower than Bitcoin's inflation rate.

E Guardian believes that Ethereum's extremely low inflation rate means ETH is more scarce, concluding that Ethereum's value is far undervalued.

However, I resonate deeply with one of the points made by $BTC maxi: Scarcity should be measured by the difficulty of output/mining; the higher the difficulty, the stronger the scarcity attribute.

From the perspective of output difficulty, Ethereum does not possess such scarcity. Therefore, comparing the value of Bitcoin and Ethereum from the inflation perspective is unfair.

The reference point for ETH as a world computer should not be positioned as Bitcoin, which is viewed as a store of value; it should be comparable to TradeFi's NVIDIA.

So, why not have both? Only children make choices.