$Jager Jager: an obvious Ponzi scheme

I perfectly illustrate Jager's problem here with a simple example.

You invest $5,000. Upon entry, a fee of $500 is deducted: you are left with $4,500.

Then, you make a profit of $500. Your capital rises back to $5,000.

But at the time of selling, a new fee of $500 applies. Result: you drop back down to $4,500.

In this scenario, you made an effort to generate a gain, but in the end, you come out with a net loss of $1,500.

This is exactly the mechanics of a Ponzi scheme: new entrants finance the old ones, and regardless of the increases, the majority will end up losing badly, while the big ones will pocket hefty dividends.

If you want more information, check my wall; if you don't understand, I can't help you!

For the smarter ones who are interested. Follow me.