After my historical article describing the future of BTC, I used AI and input images of the article, and asked the AI not to search for BTC price charts, but to draw the price trend solely based on the text description in the article.
You can see the trend drawn by AI after understanding the article, as shown in the image:
The first image is the content of the article,
The second image is the BTC trend,
The third image shows that AI did not search for BTC prices, but simply derived the price trend based on its understanding of the article.
This implies that when we analyze and write articles, we shouldn't just look at the article and assume BTC has already crashed to 80,000; that is not what the article states. It talks about how future trends will be, and we should be able to accurately determine the price trend solely from the text without looking at the prices in the future.
It is not about reading the article and thinking BTC has already reached 200,000 or assuming it has dropped to 80,000 without consulting the charts.
You can see in the attached image, the white chart drawn by AI perfectly matches the BTC trend. This is similar to a person describing another person's appearance through words; it requires drawing an exact likeness based on the text, which is correct.
However, the current issue is why one cannot discern the trend from the article when describing a future that has not yet occurred???
Similarly, AI can directly draw the trend that exactly matches the factual trend just by looking at the text.
