$WCT allows users to become the "makers" of Web3 rules
Is the Web3 project still determined by the "team"? #WalletConnect , along with $WCT , has subverted this notion—token holders can vote to decide the development of the protocol, from small optimizations like connection animations to significant decisions like integrating new public chains. 59,000 stakers have already cast over 20 proposals using WCT, truly realizing the concept of "users being in charge".
@WalletConnect 's governance mechanism is very user-friendly: proposals don't need to be written in complex code; they can be described in natural language; voting weight is linked to staking duration, encouraging long-term participation. For instance, the community recently approved a proposal to "optimize mobile connection speed," increasing the success rate for mobile users from 85% to 99%. This model of "fixing what users care about" is much more reliable than creating behind closed doors.
WCT provides governance with "sweet rewards": participating in voting can earn extra $WCT rewards; high-quality proposers can also receive support from the ecological fund. This design of "more participation leads to more benefits" has significantly increased community activity, with the most recent proposal seeing participation exceeding 100,000, setting an industry record.
While the governance of other projects is merely a "facade," @WalletConnect has made governance take root. #WalletConnect is not just shouting the slogan of decentralization; it ensures that every user's voice carries weight. When the rules are set by the users, technology can truly serve the people.
