My articles are all describing the future situation of BTC, and the articles are focused on describing the future, rather than inferring the future based on history.
Here, I explain the words "possible," "if," "suppose," and "hypothetically" used to describe the future, and the difference between these words and those used by most analysts who infer the future based on history.
Some people feel that using the words "possible, if, suppose, hypothetically" means it is said casually. They think it is the same as saying nothing, considering it could go up or down, all based on their own understanding of using history to guess the future.
The correct emphasis on defining these terms in my articles is as follows:
If you see my articles using the words "possible, if, suppose, hypothetically," it is always describing the future, rather than historical inference (guessing) about the future, and not the use of the word 'possible' by others who judge the future based on history.
The use of "possible" in my articles to describe the future means that the "defined main force" will inform when it needs to appear in that "moment" in the future. It is not the possible used by other analysts who use guessing.
Suppose it is said "possible to be faster," this is because, for example, there will not only be one main force appearing in the future. This faster possibility is because if it appears, it will establish a low point earlier than other main forces.
Thus, the correct meaning is that it exclusively pertains to whether he appears, which allows one to know "it is 100% up or 0% up," and "does not refer to a possible rise."
Therefore, this possibility is based on describing multiple main forces, choosing who to act and using the possibility.