A recent post from Solana on X sparked a debate about transaction speeds, comparing Ethereum's 22 TPS to Nasdaq's 2,000 trades per second. Solana implied its superiority in modern market operations, but Ethereum supporters criticized the comparison as flawed, highlighting the differences between decentralized blockchains and centralized exchanges. Researcher polynya countered that Nasdaq's infrastructure can handle 10 million operations per second with minimal latency, far surpassing what any decentralized layer-1 can achieve. He argued that without significant advancements in technology, Nasdaq will remain much faster and cheaper. Polynya suggested that blockchains should focus on succinct cryptography, like ZK proofs, to improve real-time market capabilities, although this approach has its own challenges. Solana's founder, Anatoly Yakovenko, disagreed, stating that ZK proofs are slower than traditional methods and emphasized the importance of scheduling over TPS. He also noted that Solana's design minimizes the economic impact of dropped transactions. Ultimately, Solana aims to provide accessible, decentralized trading rather than merely matching Nasdaq's speed. Read more AI-generated news on: https://app.chaingpt.org/news

#ETH