There are always people saying that rolling over positions has high risks, but that's not true—real rolling relies on position management to minimize risks, which is much safer than blindly opening orders.
Take 50,000 as an example (provided that this 50,000 is your earned profit; friends who are still losing should stabilize first):
Assuming you open a position when Bitcoin is at 10,000, using 10x leverage and a gradual position mode, only opening 10% of the position (which is 5,000 as collateral), this is actually equivalent to the risk of 1x leverage. Set a 2% stop loss, and even if it hits the stop loss, you only lose 2% (1,000), how could you possibly get liquidated? Even in extreme situations, if you get liquidated, you would only lose this 5,000, and the principal would not be harmed at all.
If the direction is correct, and Bitcoin rises to 11,000, then open 10% of the total funds, also set a 2% stop loss. At this point, even if you hit the stop loss, the previous profits still remain at 8%; where's the risk? By analogy, when Bitcoin rises to 15,000, if the additional position goes smoothly, you could roll out around 200,000 from 50% of the market. The so-called '100x' has never been built up by compounding 10% every day, but rather by capturing two 10x and three 5x market movements, rolling up step by step.
What's the core? Position management. As long as you control the proportion of each position opening and use stop losses, it's hard to lose everything.
Some people say that rolling relies on high leverage? This is a misconception. You can roll with 10x leverage, and you can also roll with 1x or 2x leverage. I usually only use 2 to 3 times leverage, catch two market movements, and it's not hard to achieve returns of dozens of times; even if you use 0.5 times leverage, as long as the timing is right, you can still roll—leverage is chosen by you and is unrelated to the concept of rolling itself.
Let's talk about risk control: In cryptocurrency investment, it is recommended to only enter with one-fifth of the total funds, and among that, only use one-tenth of the cash funds to trade contracts. For example, if you have 1 million, put at most 20,000 in the contract account, and use two to three times leverage, only trading mainstream coins like Bitcoin. Even if this 20,000 incurs losses, the impact on the total funds of 1 million is almost negligible; isn't this risk low enough?
If small funds want to grow big, never fall into the misconception of 'making quick money in the short term.' A piece of paper folded 27 times can reach a thickness of 13 kilometers, and folded 37 times can exceed the diameter of the Earth—small funds should focus on medium to long-term strategies, growing through the logic of 'doubling and then doubling again.' For example, start with 30,000 in capital, find a way to triple it to 90,000, then triple it again to 270,000, and slowly roll it up to hundreds of thousands. Always thinking about making 10% or 20% every day can easily lead to losing big due to small losses.
As for 'contracts have no risk'? It's not that the contracts themselves have no risk, but rather that one can use strategies to minimize risks:
• Either manage funds like top funds, using other people's money to trade, with the risk borne by the clients (of course, this requires you to have strength and reputation first);
• Either play contracts with profits. For example, first invest 200,000 to buy spot, earn 50,000 and then use this 50,000 to play contracts. Even if you lose, you only lose the profit, not the principal, so the mindset is naturally stable.
Contracts never harm people; it's the uncontrolled greed that harms people.
I am Xiao Wai, focusing on analysis and teaching. If you are confused and stuck in trading, not knowing how to roll over positions or control risks, follow me—I will guide you to protect your principal with position management and expand your profits using rolling logic, helping you to walk more steadily and further in the market.