Not all large holdings are a bad thing
Many people jump to conclusions that high token concentration means a risky project.
But the on-chain truth is often more complex than we imagine.
Once, I used BubbleMaps to analyze a new public chain project,
I found that the top ten holding addresses accounted for 65% of the total supply.
At first glance, this seems dangerous.
🫧 But the bubble chart shows that these addresses are marked as well-known VCs, strategic partners, and staking contracts.
More importantly—these funds are locked long-term, liquidity is healthy,
and the wallets are created at different times, with almost no mutual transfers.
This means:
High token concentration does not equal manipulation.
Transparent distribution + reasonable lock-up is, on the contrary, a stable signal.
BubbleMaps is not just used to find problems,
it can also help us confirm whether a project is trustworthy.
Investment is not about blind faith or blind suspicion, but making a more balanced judgment based on data.
#Bubblemaps @Bubblemaps.io $BMT