Official Report — Debunking the FUD about “OnlyOwner” in JÄGER 🔥💎

In the last few hours, the account "the EXO Girl," which is a user without technical knowledge, has been spreading FUD/Rumor that JÄGER has not renounced the contract just because in BscScan the quantum genius of the galaxies states that the word “OnlyOwner” appears.

📢 This is FALSE, and I will explain to her and those who distrust in the simplest way possible:

📌 1. What does “OnlyOwner” mean in a smart contract?

“OnlyOwner” is a technical label within the code, used to indicate that certain functions can only be executed by the owner of the contract.

After renouncing ownership, that figure of “owner” ceases to exist (the ownership address remains at “0x000…dead”).

The code continues to show “OnlyOwner” because it is part of the original programming, but no one can use those functions: it’s like having a key that has been destroyed 🔑🔥

📌 2. Why did JÄGER indeed renounce the contract?

The ownership address in the contract now points to the null address (0x000...dead).

This means there is no human account that can call “OnlyOwner” functions.

📜 Evidence on BscScan: In the “Read Contract” tab, it can be verified that the ownership no longer belongs to any person or entity.

Moreover, outlets like Bitget Academy confirm that Jäger Hunter has renounced ownership and total control of the community.

📌 3. What does this mean for investors?

✅ Security and trust — no one can change rules, increase taxes, or manipulate the contract.

✅ Real decentralization — all key functions are automated.

✅ Secured burning and rewards system — it will continue to operate without human intervention.

📢 “OnlyOwner” does not mean there is 1 owner; it means that the original code had that function, but after the renunciation, that “key” no longer exists.

💎🔥 JÄGER is 100% of the community, without an owner and without risk of manipulation$Jager